Disappearing Text as a Clinical Decision Support Layer: A Case Series.

IF 2.2 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Applied Clinical Informatics Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-05 DOI:10.1055/a-2675-3510
Jared Silberlust, William Small, Darhsi Shah, Eesha Chakravartty, Katherine Moawad, Andrew Moawad, Paul Testa, Jonah Feldman
{"title":"Disappearing Text as a Clinical Decision Support Layer: A Case Series.","authors":"Jared Silberlust, William Small, Darhsi Shah, Eesha Chakravartty, Katherine Moawad, Andrew Moawad, Paul Testa, Jonah Feldman","doi":"10.1055/a-2675-3510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This case series aims to evaluate several applications of inline disappearing text (DT) clinical decision support (CDS) tools within clinician documentation.DT blocks were created to prompt documentation for perioperative anticoagulation planning (scenario 1), predischarge intravenous antibiotic planning (scenario 2), and advanced care planning (ACP; scenario 3). In scenario 1, DT was the only intervention. In scenario 2, DT was paired with a documentation SmartList. In scenario 3, DT was paired with a documentation SmartList and an OurPractice advisory. The number of documented perioperative anticoagulation plans, predischarge intravenous antibiotic plans, and ACP notes was measured pre- and postintervention and compared using chi-square analyses.In scenario 1, there was no statistically significant change in the percentage of perioperative anticoagulation plans documented at 0 to 24 and 24 to 48 hours before surgery. In scenario 2, documentation of antibiotic contingency planning in patients expected to be discharged within 24 hours increased from 60% (54/90 notes) to 93% (1,850/1,994 notes) <i>X</i> <sup>2</sup> (1, <i>n</i> = 2,084) = 113.1, <i>p</i> < 0.001. In scenario 3, ACP note documentation by discharge in patients with a positive mandatory surprise question increased from 43% (821/1,909 encounters) to 52% (975/1,874 encounters) <i>X</i> <sup>2</sup> (1, <i>n</i> = 3,783) = 30.5, <i>p</i> < 0.001.Utilizing DT in conjunction with other forms of CDS was associated with an improvement of documentation quality in predischarge IV antibiotics and ACP. A sociotechnical analysis explores how interactions between technology, people, workflow, and culture could contextualize how utilizing DT with other forms of CDS was more effective than DT alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":"1114-1120"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12443503/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2675-3510","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This case series aims to evaluate several applications of inline disappearing text (DT) clinical decision support (CDS) tools within clinician documentation.DT blocks were created to prompt documentation for perioperative anticoagulation planning (scenario 1), predischarge intravenous antibiotic planning (scenario 2), and advanced care planning (ACP; scenario 3). In scenario 1, DT was the only intervention. In scenario 2, DT was paired with a documentation SmartList. In scenario 3, DT was paired with a documentation SmartList and an OurPractice advisory. The number of documented perioperative anticoagulation plans, predischarge intravenous antibiotic plans, and ACP notes was measured pre- and postintervention and compared using chi-square analyses.In scenario 1, there was no statistically significant change in the percentage of perioperative anticoagulation plans documented at 0 to 24 and 24 to 48 hours before surgery. In scenario 2, documentation of antibiotic contingency planning in patients expected to be discharged within 24 hours increased from 60% (54/90 notes) to 93% (1,850/1,994 notes) X 2 (1, n = 2,084) = 113.1, p < 0.001. In scenario 3, ACP note documentation by discharge in patients with a positive mandatory surprise question increased from 43% (821/1,909 encounters) to 52% (975/1,874 encounters) X 2 (1, n = 3,783) = 30.5, p < 0.001.Utilizing DT in conjunction with other forms of CDS was associated with an improvement of documentation quality in predischarge IV antibiotics and ACP. A sociotechnical analysis explores how interactions between technology, people, workflow, and culture could contextualize how utilizing DT with other forms of CDS was more effective than DT alone.

作为临床决策支持层的消失文本:一个案例系列。
目的:本案例系列旨在评估内联消失文本(DT)临床决策支持(CDS)工具在临床医生文档中的几种应用。方法:创建DT块以提示围手术期抗凝计划(场景1),出院前静脉注射抗生素计划(场景2)和晚期护理计划(场景3)的文件。在场景1中,DT是唯一的干预措施。在场景2中,DT与文档SmartList配对。在场景3中,DT与文档SmartList和OurPractice Advisory配对。测量围手术期抗凝计划、出院前静脉注射抗生素计划和高级护理计划记录的数量,并使用卡方分析进行比较。结果:在场景1中,术前0-24小时和24-48小时记录的围手术期抗凝计划百分比无统计学意义变化。在情景2中,预计在24小时内出院的患者的抗生素应急计划记录从60%(90份记录中的54份)增加到93%(1994份记录中的1850份)X2 (1, N= 2084) = 113.1, p < 0.001。在场景3中,强制惊喜问题阳性的患者出院时ACP记录从43%(1,909例就诊中的821例)增加到52%(1,874例就诊中的975例)X2 (1, N=3,783) = 30.5, p < 0.001。结论:结合使用DT与其他形式的CDS与出院前静脉注射抗生素和高级护理计划的文件质量的改善有关。一项社会技术分析探讨了技术、人员、工作流程和文化之间的相互作用如何使DT与其他形式的CDS结合使用比单独使用DT更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信