Risk Factors for Development of Stroke in Patients With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Support as Destination Therapy.

IF 0.9 4区 医学
Texas Heart Institute Journal Pub Date : 2025-08-04 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.14503/THIJ-23-8332
Ioana B Florea, Nadia H Bakir, Meghan O Kelly, Joel D Schilling, Gregory A Ewald, Akinobu Itoh, Marc R Moon, Spencer J Melby, Ralph J Damiano, Kunal D Kotkar, Muhammad F Masood
{"title":"Risk Factors for Development of Stroke in Patients With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Support as Destination Therapy.","authors":"Ioana B Florea, Nadia H Bakir, Meghan O Kelly, Joel D Schilling, Gregory A Ewald, Akinobu Itoh, Marc R Moon, Spencer J Melby, Ralph J Damiano, Kunal D Kotkar, Muhammad F Masood","doi":"10.14503/THIJ-23-8332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are increasingly used as destination therapy. Although postimplantation stroke rates have been described in the context of bridge-to-transplant or mixed cohorts, stroke development is not well evaluated in patients who receive continuous-flow LVAD with a destination therapy indication. This report characterizes the stroke profile of a modern institutional cohort of patients undergoing destination therapy and evaluates their risk factors for stroke onset.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients implanted with continuous-flow LVAD as destination therapy at the reporting institution between January 2010 and June 2020 were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Stroke was defined as any neurologic deficit caused by an abrupt disruption in cerebral blood flow that did not resolve within 24 hours and that was confirmed by imaging. Terminal outcomes of stroke development and death were assessed using a competing-risks model. Fine-Gray regression was used to evaluate potential predictors of stroke development.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients who received continuous-flow LVAD (N = 311) were classified by device type: Heart-Mate II (Abbott; n = 97); HeartMate 3 (Abbott; n = 72); and HeartWare Ventricular Assist Device (Medtronic; n = 42). Thirty-five percent of patients (110/311) developed postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF). Estimated stroke incidence was 15% at 1 year, 24% at 3 years, and 27% at 5 years. According to multivariable Fine-Gray regression, receiving a HeartMate 3 device (subdistribution hazard ratio [HR], 0.41 [95% CI, 0.19-0.90]; <i>P</i> = .03) and amiodarone at discharge (HR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.33-0.94]; <i>P</i> = .03) were associated with lower stroke risk. Postoperative AF (HR, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.03-2.73]; <i>P</i> = .04) was associated with increased stroke risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The HeartMate 3 was associated with decreased stroke rates, but risk remained high for patients who developed postoperative AF. Further investigation into protective strategies and use of amiodarone to treat AF after continuous-flow LVAD implantation is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48680,"journal":{"name":"Texas Heart Institute Journal","volume":"52 2","pages":"e238332"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12322576/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Texas Heart Institute Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14503/THIJ-23-8332","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are increasingly used as destination therapy. Although postimplantation stroke rates have been described in the context of bridge-to-transplant or mixed cohorts, stroke development is not well evaluated in patients who receive continuous-flow LVAD with a destination therapy indication. This report characterizes the stroke profile of a modern institutional cohort of patients undergoing destination therapy and evaluates their risk factors for stroke onset.

Methods: Patients implanted with continuous-flow LVAD as destination therapy at the reporting institution between January 2010 and June 2020 were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Stroke was defined as any neurologic deficit caused by an abrupt disruption in cerebral blood flow that did not resolve within 24 hours and that was confirmed by imaging. Terminal outcomes of stroke development and death were assessed using a competing-risks model. Fine-Gray regression was used to evaluate potential predictors of stroke development.

Results: Patients who received continuous-flow LVAD (N = 311) were classified by device type: Heart-Mate II (Abbott; n = 97); HeartMate 3 (Abbott; n = 72); and HeartWare Ventricular Assist Device (Medtronic; n = 42). Thirty-five percent of patients (110/311) developed postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF). Estimated stroke incidence was 15% at 1 year, 24% at 3 years, and 27% at 5 years. According to multivariable Fine-Gray regression, receiving a HeartMate 3 device (subdistribution hazard ratio [HR], 0.41 [95% CI, 0.19-0.90]; P = .03) and amiodarone at discharge (HR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.33-0.94]; P = .03) were associated with lower stroke risk. Postoperative AF (HR, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.03-2.73]; P = .04) was associated with increased stroke risk.

Conclusion: The HeartMate 3 was associated with decreased stroke rates, but risk remained high for patients who developed postoperative AF. Further investigation into protective strategies and use of amiodarone to treat AF after continuous-flow LVAD implantation is needed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

以连续血流左心室辅助装置支持为目的治疗的患者发生脑卒中的危险因素。
背景:连续血流左心室辅助装置(lvad)越来越多地被用作目的治疗。尽管在移植桥或混合队列中描述了移植后卒中的发生率,但对于接受有目的地治疗指证的连续血流LVAD患者,卒中的发展尚未得到很好的评估。本报告描述了一个接受目的地治疗的现代机构队列患者的中风概况,并评估了他们中风发作的危险因素。方法:回顾性分析2010年1月至2020年6月在报告机构植入连续血流LVAD作为目的治疗的患者。中风被定义为由脑血流突然中断引起的任何神经功能缺陷,且在24小时内没有得到影像学证实。使用竞争风险模型评估卒中发展和死亡的最终结果。细灰色回归用于评估脑卒中发展的潜在预测因素。结果:接受连续血流LVAD的患者(N = 311)按装置类型分类:Heart-Mate II (Abbott;N = 97);心伴侣3(雅培;N = 72);和HeartWare心室辅助装置(美敦力;N = 42)。35%的患者(110/311)发生术后心房颤动(AF)。估计1年中风发生率为15%,3年为24%,5年为27%。根据多变量Fine-Gray回归,接受HeartMate 3装置(亚分布风险比[HR], 0.41 [95% CI, 0.19-0.90];P = .03)和胺碘酮(HR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.33-0.94];P = .03)与较低的卒中风险相关。术后房颤(HR, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.03-2.73];P = .04)与卒中风险增加相关。结论:HeartMate 3与卒中发生率降低相关,但对于术后发生房颤的患者风险仍然很高。需要进一步研究连续血流LVAD植入后的保护策略和使用胺碘酮治疗房颤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Texas Heart Institute Journal
Texas Heart Institute Journal CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
11.10%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: For more than 45 years, the Texas Heart Institute Journal has been published by the Texas Heart Institute as part of its medical education program. Our bimonthly peer-reviewed journal enjoys a global audience of physicians, scientists, and healthcare professionals who are contributing to the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of cardiovascular disease. The Journal was printed under the name of Cardiovascular Diseases from 1974 through 1981 (ISSN 0093-3546). The name was changed to Texas Heart Institute Journal in 1982 and was printed through 2013 (ISSN 0730-2347). In 2014, the Journal moved to online-only publication. It is indexed by Index Medicus/MEDLINE and by other indexing and abstracting services worldwide. Our full archive is available at PubMed Central. The Journal invites authors to submit these article types for review: -Clinical Investigations- Laboratory Investigations- Reviews- Techniques- Coronary Anomalies- History of Medicine- Case Reports/Case Series (Submission Fee: $70.00 USD)- Images in Cardiovascular Medicine (Submission Fee: $35.00 USD)- Guest Editorials- Peabody’s Corner- Letters to the Editor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信