Gender, work, and satisfaction: a decomposition approach to job satisfaction gaps in Egypt and Tunisia.

IF 2.2 Q2 SOCIOLOGY
Frontiers in Sociology Pub Date : 2025-07-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fsoc.2025.1573489
Mesbah Fathy Sharaf, Abdelhalem Mahmoud Shahen
{"title":"Gender, work, and satisfaction: a decomposition approach to job satisfaction gaps in Egypt and Tunisia.","authors":"Mesbah Fathy Sharaf, Abdelhalem Mahmoud Shahen","doi":"10.3389/fsoc.2025.1573489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study revisits the paradox of the contented female worker by analyzing gender disparities in job satisfaction in Egypt and Tunisia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using nationally representative labor force survey data, we construct a multidimensional job satisfaction index based on eight dimensions: earnings, job security, nature of work, working hours, work schedule, work environment, commuting distance, and job-qualification match. To explain gender gaps in job satisfaction, we apply the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition method, both with and without correcting for sample selection bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our results show that conclusions about the existence and direction of the gender gap depend critically on accounting for selection effects. Before correcting for selection bias, women in Egypt report significantly higher job satisfaction than men, while no gender gap is observed in Tunisia-echoing the contented female worker paradox. However, once sample selection is controlled for, the paradox disappears in both countries. In Egypt, the observed gender gap is fully explained by differences in observable characteristics (endowment effect), while in Tunisia, it is largely driven by differences in returns to those characteristics (coefficient effect), highlighting structural inequalities in the labor market.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>To test the robustness of our results, we also conduct the decomposition using an alternative measure of job satisfaction based on a single overall satisfaction question. The consistency of results across both measures reinforces the validity of our conclusions. Together, these findings caution against relying solely on standard models of job satisfaction and emphasize the importance of considering sample selection and multidimensional outcomes. The study underscores the need for policy interventions that promote fairer working conditions, expand access to employment benefits, and address gender-based disparities in labor markets.</p>","PeriodicalId":36297,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sociology","volume":"10 ","pages":"1573489"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12321886/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2025.1573489","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study revisits the paradox of the contented female worker by analyzing gender disparities in job satisfaction in Egypt and Tunisia.

Methods: Using nationally representative labor force survey data, we construct a multidimensional job satisfaction index based on eight dimensions: earnings, job security, nature of work, working hours, work schedule, work environment, commuting distance, and job-qualification match. To explain gender gaps in job satisfaction, we apply the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition method, both with and without correcting for sample selection bias.

Results: Our results show that conclusions about the existence and direction of the gender gap depend critically on accounting for selection effects. Before correcting for selection bias, women in Egypt report significantly higher job satisfaction than men, while no gender gap is observed in Tunisia-echoing the contented female worker paradox. However, once sample selection is controlled for, the paradox disappears in both countries. In Egypt, the observed gender gap is fully explained by differences in observable characteristics (endowment effect), while in Tunisia, it is largely driven by differences in returns to those characteristics (coefficient effect), highlighting structural inequalities in the labor market.

Discussion: To test the robustness of our results, we also conduct the decomposition using an alternative measure of job satisfaction based on a single overall satisfaction question. The consistency of results across both measures reinforces the validity of our conclusions. Together, these findings caution against relying solely on standard models of job satisfaction and emphasize the importance of considering sample selection and multidimensional outcomes. The study underscores the need for policy interventions that promote fairer working conditions, expand access to employment benefits, and address gender-based disparities in labor markets.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

性别、工作和满意度:埃及和突尼斯工作满意度差距的分解方法。
前言:本研究通过分析埃及和突尼斯工作满意度的性别差异,重新审视了满足女工的悖论。方法:利用具有全国代表性的劳动力调查数据,从收入、工作保障、工作性质、工作时间、工作安排、工作环境、通勤距离和工作资格匹配等8个维度构建多维工作满意度指数。为了解释工作满意度的性别差异,我们采用Blinder-Oaxaca分解方法,同时校正和不校正样本选择偏差。结果:我们的研究结果表明,关于性别差距的存在和方向的结论主要取决于对选择效应的考虑。在修正选择偏见之前,埃及女性报告的工作满意度明显高于男性,而在突尼斯没有观察到性别差异——呼应了满足的女工悖论。然而,一旦样本选择得到控制,这一悖论在两国就消失了。在埃及,观察到的性别差距完全可以用可观察特征的差异(禀赋效应)来解释,而在突尼斯,这在很大程度上是由这些特征的回报差异(系数效应)驱动的,突出了劳动力市场的结构性不平等。讨论:为了测试我们的结果的稳健性,我们还使用基于单个总体满意度问题的工作满意度的替代测量来进行分解。两种测量结果的一致性加强了我们结论的有效性。总之,这些发现提醒人们不要仅仅依赖于工作满意度的标准模型,并强调了考虑样本选择和多维结果的重要性。该研究强调需要采取政策干预措施,促进更公平的工作条件,扩大获得就业福利的机会,并解决劳动力市场中基于性别的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Sociology
Frontiers in Sociology Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
198
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信