New Ways of Working to Manage and Improve Quality in Integrated Care Systems in England.

IF 5.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Mirza Lalani, Michele Peters, Thavapriya Sugavanam, Helen Crocker, James Caiels, Harriet Hay, Sarah Gunn, Helen Hogan, Bethan Page, Ray Fitzpatrick
{"title":"New Ways of Working to Manage and Improve Quality in Integrated Care Systems in England.","authors":"Mirza Lalani, Michele Peters, Thavapriya Sugavanam, Helen Crocker, James Caiels, Harriet Hay, Sarah Gunn, Helen Hogan, Bethan Page, Ray Fitzpatrick","doi":"10.34172/ijhpm.8424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Integrated care systems (ICSs) in England were formally established in July 2022 to coordinate the planning and delivery of health and care services. A key responsibility was to address the quality of these services. Our study aimed to examine how ICSs approach this responsibility and to identify opportunities and barriers experienced in their early establishment and development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A sample of four ICSs were recruited to participate. Interviews and meeting observations were undertaken in two phases (before and after the inception of ICSs) around 12 months apart. A total of 112 interviews were carried out with senior figures in the four ICSs supplemented by observation of relevant meetings and analysis of relevant documents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regarding quality, ICSs demonstrated several new ways of working. They set-up new structures for quality governance and created whole-system strategies for quality centred on major responsibilities regarding population health and health inequalities. These strategies required new and relevant metrics to assess quality and outcomes and a greater focus upon co-production in the development of services. They aimed to strike a fine balance between long-standing requirements for quality assurance and new responsibilities for quality improvement (QI). New approaches were underpinned by new collaborations between system partners extending beyond healthcare to include Local Authorities (responsible for social care and public health) and local communities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To address the many challenges of quality, ICSs have created new ways of working cultivating different kinds of collaborative relationships compared to established hierarchical, siloed and top-down ways of working prior to their formation. A focus on improving population health and reducing inequalities has required a shift from \"here and now\" urgent problem-solving to working with longer timelines. Such changes require patience in the context of political pressure to devote efforts to more salient problems such as waiting lists.</p>","PeriodicalId":14135,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Policy and Management","volume":"14 ","pages":"8424"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11845859/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Policy and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.8424","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Integrated care systems (ICSs) in England were formally established in July 2022 to coordinate the planning and delivery of health and care services. A key responsibility was to address the quality of these services. Our study aimed to examine how ICSs approach this responsibility and to identify opportunities and barriers experienced in their early establishment and development.

Methods: A sample of four ICSs were recruited to participate. Interviews and meeting observations were undertaken in two phases (before and after the inception of ICSs) around 12 months apart. A total of 112 interviews were carried out with senior figures in the four ICSs supplemented by observation of relevant meetings and analysis of relevant documents.

Results: Regarding quality, ICSs demonstrated several new ways of working. They set-up new structures for quality governance and created whole-system strategies for quality centred on major responsibilities regarding population health and health inequalities. These strategies required new and relevant metrics to assess quality and outcomes and a greater focus upon co-production in the development of services. They aimed to strike a fine balance between long-standing requirements for quality assurance and new responsibilities for quality improvement (QI). New approaches were underpinned by new collaborations between system partners extending beyond healthcare to include Local Authorities (responsible for social care and public health) and local communities.

Conclusion: To address the many challenges of quality, ICSs have created new ways of working cultivating different kinds of collaborative relationships compared to established hierarchical, siloed and top-down ways of working prior to their formation. A focus on improving population health and reducing inequalities has required a shift from "here and now" urgent problem-solving to working with longer timelines. Such changes require patience in the context of political pressure to devote efforts to more salient problems such as waiting lists.

在英格兰管理和提高综合护理系统质量的新方法。
背景:英国于2022年7月正式建立综合护理系统(ics),以协调卫生和保健服务的规划和提供。一项关键责任是解决这些服务的质量问题。我们的研究旨在研究国际集成系统如何履行这一责任,并确定其早期建立和发展中遇到的机会和障碍。方法:选取4名国际入境者参与研究。访谈和会议观察分两个阶段进行(在国际系统开始之前和之后),间隔大约12个月。与四个国际系统的高级人员共进行了112次面谈,并补充了对有关会议的观察和对有关文件的分析。结果:在质量方面,ICSs展示了几种新的工作方式。他们建立了新的质量管理结构,并制定了以人口健康和卫生不平等方面的主要责任为中心的质量全系统战略。这些战略需要新的相关指标来评估质量和成果,并更加注重服务发展中的合作生产。他们的目标是在长期存在的质量保证需求和质量改进(QI)的新责任之间取得良好的平衡。系统伙伴之间的新合作为新方法提供了支持,这些合作超出了卫生保健范围,包括地方当局(负责社会保健和公共卫生)和地方社区。结论:为了应对质量方面的诸多挑战,国际集成系统创建了新的工作方式来培养不同类型的合作关系,而不是在其形成之前建立的等级、孤立和自上而下的工作方式。注重改善人口健康和减少不平等,需要从“此时此地”的紧急解决问题转变为更长期的工作。在政治压力的背景下,这种改变需要耐心,以努力解决等候名单等更突出的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
International Journal of Health Policy and Management Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
142
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Health Policy and Management (IJHPM) is a monthly open access, peer-reviewed journal which serves as an international and interdisciplinary setting for the dissemination of health policy and management research. It brings together individual specialties from different fields, notably health management/policy/economics, epidemiology, social/public policy, and philosophy into a dynamic academic mix.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信