Acting on the Evidence: The Challenges Facing Policy and Practice Comment on "Barriers and Opportunities for WHO 'Best Buys' Non-communicable Disease Policy Adoption and Implementation From a Political Economy Perspective: A Complexity Systematic Review".

IF 5.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
David J Hunter
{"title":"Acting on the Evidence: The Challenges Facing Policy and Practice Comment on \"Barriers and Opportunities for WHO 'Best Buys' Non-communicable Disease Policy Adoption and Implementation From a Political Economy Perspective: A Complexity Systematic Review\".","authors":"David J Hunter","doi":"10.34172/ijhpm.9022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Even in situations where there exists robust evidence on what works and what needs to change to tackle deep-seated and persistent public health challenges, the lack of sustained progress across polities globally remains a cause for concern. Adopting a political economy perspective to better understand why the adoption and implementation of policies to tackle non-communicable diseases (NCDs) continues to be deficient, Loffreda and colleagues' systematic review of facilitating and inhibiting factors sheds valuable light on the subject. The adoption of a political economy approach is long overdue since it gets to the nub of identifying enablers and barriers to change and how to tackle the latter while strengthening the former. However, whether such an approach will be welcomed by policy-makers or be rejected merits further exploration if research is going to stand any chance of being heeded and acted upon.</p>","PeriodicalId":14135,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Policy and Management","volume":"14 ","pages":"9022"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12337163/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Policy and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.9022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Even in situations where there exists robust evidence on what works and what needs to change to tackle deep-seated and persistent public health challenges, the lack of sustained progress across polities globally remains a cause for concern. Adopting a political economy perspective to better understand why the adoption and implementation of policies to tackle non-communicable diseases (NCDs) continues to be deficient, Loffreda and colleagues' systematic review of facilitating and inhibiting factors sheds valuable light on the subject. The adoption of a political economy approach is long overdue since it gets to the nub of identifying enablers and barriers to change and how to tackle the latter while strengthening the former. However, whether such an approach will be welcomed by policy-makers or be rejected merits further exploration if research is going to stand any chance of being heeded and acted upon.

对“从政治经济学角度看世卫组织‘最合买’非传染性疾病政策采纳和实施的障碍和机遇:一项复杂的系统审查”的评论。
即使在有确凿证据表明哪些措施有效、哪些措施需要改变以应对根深蒂固和持续存在的公共卫生挑战的情况下,全球各政策缺乏持续进展仍然令人关切。Loffreda及其同事对促进和抑制因素进行了系统审查,从政治经济学的角度更好地理解为什么采取和执行应对非传染性疾病的政策仍然存在缺陷,这为这一问题提供了宝贵的见解。采用政治经济学方法早就应该了,因为它涉及到确定变革的推动因素和障碍,以及如何在加强前者的同时解决后者的关键问题。然而,这种方法是否会受到决策者的欢迎或被拒绝,如果研究要有任何被注意和采取行动的机会,就值得进一步探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
International Journal of Health Policy and Management Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
142
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Health Policy and Management (IJHPM) is a monthly open access, peer-reviewed journal which serves as an international and interdisciplinary setting for the dissemination of health policy and management research. It brings together individual specialties from different fields, notably health management/policy/economics, epidemiology, social/public policy, and philosophy into a dynamic academic mix.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信