Ethical and regulatory requirements for conducting researcher-driven large-scale multinational genetic haematological studies: the INHERENT experience.
{"title":"Ethical and regulatory requirements for conducting researcher-driven large-scale multinational genetic haematological studies: the INHERENT experience.","authors":"Antonella Didio, Viviana Giannuzzi, Natasha Archer, Esther Gani, Sabina Sblano, Emmanuel Peprah, Petros Kountouris, Fedele Bonifazi","doi":"10.1186/s12961-025-01375-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The International Hemoglobinopathy Research Network (INHERENT) focuses on studying genetic modifiers through large, multi-ethnic genome-wide association studies involving paediatric and adult patients with haemoglobinopathies. The growing integration of genetics and genomics into global healthcare has highlighted the need for standardized policies on biospecimen and data handling. This study describes the necessary ethical and regulatory framework for conducting multinational, researcher-driven genetic studies on humans.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Key areas related to the INHERENT study were identified through collaborative research. A review of the grey literature was performed, consulting official sources. An online survey was conducted to identify the local rules.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite the availability of 33 international documents applicable to the three key areas of our investigation, i.e. personal data processing, clinical research and biospecimen management, there is no unique reference for genetic studies without investigational drugs, i.e. outside the scope of good clinical practice. Specific laws and guidelines/recommendations governing the processing of personal data and privacy have been released in most of the 32 surveyed countries. As an example, discordances were found regarding the requirement to get approval from the ethics committees.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Such heterogeneity challenges the scientific community in conducting these genetic studies. This study calls for further efforts to harmonize international standards for genetic research.</p>","PeriodicalId":12870,"journal":{"name":"Health Research Policy and Systems","volume":"23 1","pages":"101"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12323221/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Research Policy and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-025-01375-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The International Hemoglobinopathy Research Network (INHERENT) focuses on studying genetic modifiers through large, multi-ethnic genome-wide association studies involving paediatric and adult patients with haemoglobinopathies. The growing integration of genetics and genomics into global healthcare has highlighted the need for standardized policies on biospecimen and data handling. This study describes the necessary ethical and regulatory framework for conducting multinational, researcher-driven genetic studies on humans.
Methods: Key areas related to the INHERENT study were identified through collaborative research. A review of the grey literature was performed, consulting official sources. An online survey was conducted to identify the local rules.
Results: Despite the availability of 33 international documents applicable to the three key areas of our investigation, i.e. personal data processing, clinical research and biospecimen management, there is no unique reference for genetic studies without investigational drugs, i.e. outside the scope of good clinical practice. Specific laws and guidelines/recommendations governing the processing of personal data and privacy have been released in most of the 32 surveyed countries. As an example, discordances were found regarding the requirement to get approval from the ethics committees.
Conclusions: Such heterogeneity challenges the scientific community in conducting these genetic studies. This study calls for further efforts to harmonize international standards for genetic research.
期刊介绍:
Health Research Policy and Systems is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that aims to provide a platform for the global research community to share their views, findings, insights and successes. Health Research Policy and Systems considers manuscripts that investigate the role of evidence-based health policy and health research systems in ensuring the efficient utilization and application of knowledge to improve health and health equity, especially in developing countries. Research is the foundation for improvements in public health. The problem is that people involved in different areas of research, together with managers and administrators in charge of research entities, do not communicate sufficiently with each other.