Ethical and regulatory requirements for conducting researcher-driven large-scale multinational genetic haematological studies: the INHERENT experience.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Antonella Didio, Viviana Giannuzzi, Natasha Archer, Esther Gani, Sabina Sblano, Emmanuel Peprah, Petros Kountouris, Fedele Bonifazi
{"title":"Ethical and regulatory requirements for conducting researcher-driven large-scale multinational genetic haematological studies: the INHERENT experience.","authors":"Antonella Didio, Viviana Giannuzzi, Natasha Archer, Esther Gani, Sabina Sblano, Emmanuel Peprah, Petros Kountouris, Fedele Bonifazi","doi":"10.1186/s12961-025-01375-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The International Hemoglobinopathy Research Network (INHERENT) focuses on studying genetic modifiers through large, multi-ethnic genome-wide association studies involving paediatric and adult patients with haemoglobinopathies. The growing integration of genetics and genomics into global healthcare has highlighted the need for standardized policies on biospecimen and data handling. This study describes the necessary ethical and regulatory framework for conducting multinational, researcher-driven genetic studies on humans.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Key areas related to the INHERENT study were identified through collaborative research. A review of the grey literature was performed, consulting official sources. An online survey was conducted to identify the local rules.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite the availability of 33 international documents applicable to the three key areas of our investigation, i.e. personal data processing, clinical research and biospecimen management, there is no unique reference for genetic studies without investigational drugs, i.e. outside the scope of good clinical practice. Specific laws and guidelines/recommendations governing the processing of personal data and privacy have been released in most of the 32 surveyed countries. As an example, discordances were found regarding the requirement to get approval from the ethics committees.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Such heterogeneity challenges the scientific community in conducting these genetic studies. This study calls for further efforts to harmonize international standards for genetic research.</p>","PeriodicalId":12870,"journal":{"name":"Health Research Policy and Systems","volume":"23 1","pages":"101"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12323221/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Research Policy and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-025-01375-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The International Hemoglobinopathy Research Network (INHERENT) focuses on studying genetic modifiers through large, multi-ethnic genome-wide association studies involving paediatric and adult patients with haemoglobinopathies. The growing integration of genetics and genomics into global healthcare has highlighted the need for standardized policies on biospecimen and data handling. This study describes the necessary ethical and regulatory framework for conducting multinational, researcher-driven genetic studies on humans.

Methods: Key areas related to the INHERENT study were identified through collaborative research. A review of the grey literature was performed, consulting official sources. An online survey was conducted to identify the local rules.

Results: Despite the availability of 33 international documents applicable to the three key areas of our investigation, i.e. personal data processing, clinical research and biospecimen management, there is no unique reference for genetic studies without investigational drugs, i.e. outside the scope of good clinical practice. Specific laws and guidelines/recommendations governing the processing of personal data and privacy have been released in most of the 32 surveyed countries. As an example, discordances were found regarding the requirement to get approval from the ethics committees.

Conclusions: Such heterogeneity challenges the scientific community in conducting these genetic studies. This study calls for further efforts to harmonize international standards for genetic research.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

开展研究人员驱动的大规模跨国遗传血液学研究的伦理和监管要求:固有经验。
背景:国际血红蛋白病研究网络(固有)侧重于通过涉及儿童和成人血红蛋白病患者的大型、多种族全基因组关联研究来研究遗传修饰因子。遗传学和基因组学日益融入全球医疗保健,这突出表明需要制定关于生物标本和数据处理的标准化政策。这项研究描述了进行跨国研究人员驱动的人类基因研究所需的伦理和监管框架。方法:通过合作研究,确定与本研究相关的关键领域。查阅官方资料,对灰色文献进行了回顾。一项在线调查是为了确定当地的规定。结果:尽管有33份国际文件适用于我们调查的三个关键领域,即个人数据处理、临床研究和生物标本管理,但对于没有试验药物的遗传研究,即在良好临床实践范围之外,没有独特的参考。在接受调查的32个国家中,大多数国家都公布了管理个人数据和隐私处理的具体法律和准则/建议。例如,在获得伦理委员会批准的要求上发现了不一致。结论:这种异质性对科学界进行这些基因研究提出了挑战。这项研究呼吁进一步努力协调基因研究的国际标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Research Policy and Systems
Health Research Policy and Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Research Policy and Systems is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that aims to provide a platform for the global research community to share their views, findings, insights and successes. Health Research Policy and Systems considers manuscripts that investigate the role of evidence-based health policy and health research systems in ensuring the efficient utilization and application of knowledge to improve health and health equity, especially in developing countries. Research is the foundation for improvements in public health. The problem is that people involved in different areas of research, together with managers and administrators in charge of research entities, do not communicate sufficiently with each other.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信