Failure to Reach Early MCID in ACDF Patients.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Andrea M Roca, Fatima N Anwar, Ishan Khosla, Srinath S Medakkar, Alexandra C Loya, Arash J Sayari, Gregory D Lopez, Kern Singh
{"title":"Failure to Reach Early MCID in ACDF Patients.","authors":"Andrea M Roca, Fatima N Anwar, Ishan Khosla, Srinath S Medakkar, Alexandra C Loya, Arash J Sayari, Gregory D Lopez, Kern Singh","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to identify factors of early minimal clinically important difference (MCID) failure after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Research on predictors of MCID failure after ACDF is limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing primary, elective ACDF were selected from a single spine surgeon database. Demographics, perioperative characteristics, and Visual Analog Scale Neck (VAS-N), VAS-Arm (VAS-A), Neck Disability Index (NDI), patient-reported outcome measurement information system-physical function (PROMIS-PF), 12-item Short Form (SF-12) Mental Component Score (MCS), SF-12 Physical Component Score (SF-12 PCS), and 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) scores were collected. A 2-step multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine predictors of MCID failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 240 patients were included. Preoperative VAS-N and diagnosis of foraminal stenosis were significant positive predictors of failure. Workers' compensation (WC) was a negative predictor, whereas smoker status and preoperative VAS-A were positive predictors. Preoperative PROMIS-PF, preoperative SF-12 PCS/MCS, and postoperative day 0 narcotic consumption were negative predictors, and length of stay was a positive predictor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The variations in follow-up compliance among spine surgery patients highlight the importance of identifying predictors of early MCID failure rates to avoid less than favorable patient experiences. In our study, we identified data to suggest that positive predictors of early failure may be associated with higher preoperative neck pain, smoker status, and longer length of stay. In comparison, negative predictors are related to WC insurance, better preoperative physical function and mental health, or postoperative narcotic consumption.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001824","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Objective: The objective of this study is to identify factors of early minimal clinically important difference (MCID) failure after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

Summary of background data: Research on predictors of MCID failure after ACDF is limited.

Methods: Patients undergoing primary, elective ACDF were selected from a single spine surgeon database. Demographics, perioperative characteristics, and Visual Analog Scale Neck (VAS-N), VAS-Arm (VAS-A), Neck Disability Index (NDI), patient-reported outcome measurement information system-physical function (PROMIS-PF), 12-item Short Form (SF-12) Mental Component Score (MCS), SF-12 Physical Component Score (SF-12 PCS), and 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) scores were collected. A 2-step multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine predictors of MCID failure.

Results: A total of 240 patients were included. Preoperative VAS-N and diagnosis of foraminal stenosis were significant positive predictors of failure. Workers' compensation (WC) was a negative predictor, whereas smoker status and preoperative VAS-A were positive predictors. Preoperative PROMIS-PF, preoperative SF-12 PCS/MCS, and postoperative day 0 narcotic consumption were negative predictors, and length of stay was a positive predictor.

Conclusion: The variations in follow-up compliance among spine surgery patients highlight the importance of identifying predictors of early MCID failure rates to avoid less than favorable patient experiences. In our study, we identified data to suggest that positive predictors of early failure may be associated with higher preoperative neck pain, smoker status, and longer length of stay. In comparison, negative predictors are related to WC insurance, better preoperative physical function and mental health, or postoperative narcotic consumption.

ACDF患者未能达到早期MCID。
研究设计:回顾性队列研究。目的:本研究的目的是确定前路颈椎椎间盘切除术融合(ACDF)后早期最小临床重要差异(MCID)失败的因素。背景资料总结:ACDF后MCID失效的预测因素研究有限。方法:从单一脊柱外科医生数据库中选择原发性选择性ACDF患者。收集人口统计学、围手术期特征和视觉模拟量表颈部(VAS-N)、VAS-Arm (VAS-A)、颈部残疾指数(NDI)、患者报告的结果测量信息系统-身体功能(promisi - pf)、12项简短表格(SF-12)精神成分评分(MCS)、SF-12身体成分评分(sf - 12pcs)和9项患者健康问卷(PHQ-9)评分。采用两步多变量逻辑回归来确定MCID失败的预测因素。结果:共纳入240例患者。术前VAS-N和椎间孔狭窄的诊断是失败的显著阳性预测因子。工人补偿(WC)是负向预测因子,而吸烟状况和术前VAS-A是正预测因子。术前promise - pf、术前sf - 12pcs /MCS和术后第0天麻醉用量为负预测因子,住院时间为正预测因子。结论:脊柱手术患者随访依从性的差异突出了识别早期MCID失败率预测因子的重要性,以避免不良的患者体验。在我们的研究中,我们确定的数据表明,早期手术失败的积极预测因素可能与术前颈部疼痛、吸烟状况和住院时间较长有关。相比之下,负向预测因子与WC保险、术前身体功能和心理健康状况较好或术后麻醉消耗有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Spine Surgery
Clinical Spine Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
236
期刊介绍: Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure. Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信