Viceroys in the Garden With the Monarch Butterflies: Medical Mimics of Catatonia.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Clinical Neuropharmacology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-04 DOI:10.1097/WNF.0000000000000647
Alexandre Yacques, Alexander Culver, Alexander LaFever, Brendan T Carroll
{"title":"Viceroys in the Garden With the Monarch Butterflies: Medical Mimics of Catatonia.","authors":"Alexandre Yacques, Alexander Culver, Alexander LaFever, Brendan T Carroll","doi":"10.1097/WNF.0000000000000647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Catatonia is a neuropsychiatric syndrome with diverse etiologies, often presenting significant diagnostic and research challenges due to an extremely heterogenic symptomology and pathology. The differential for catatonia is further complicated by distinct, non-catatonic medical mimics of catatonia that present similarly. We propose a new delineation of medical mimics of catatonia and an approach to differential diagnosis that will better account for the complexities of catatonia and its mimics, ultimately leading to more clinically relevant outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We obtained all case reports and case series from a Regional Medical Center in a 6-month period. All patients were diagnosed initially with F06.1 Catatonia. All patients had assessments with Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale and the KANNER catatonia rating scale. Data included diagnoses, comorbidities, treatment approaches, and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found 12 cases that met the inclusion criteria. We identified the primary diagnosis of catatonia and comorbid diagnoses. There were 3 case studies, 4 case series (N=2), and 1 presentation. Six of the 12 had co-existing medical conditions that are classified as medical mimics of catatonia. The treatment approach, diagnostic workup, and outcomes were available for all cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our finding of 50% medical mimics in our study of catatonia is analogous to encountering Viceroys in the Butterfly Garden with the Monarchs. The medical mimics, the Viceroys, are often excluded from the study of catatonia, the Monarchs, and reduce the study population. Nonetheless, the Viceroys encountered on psychiatric units, outpatient clinics, emergency rooms and consultation-liaison services still warrant assessment and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":10449,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"158-162"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNF.0000000000000647","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Catatonia is a neuropsychiatric syndrome with diverse etiologies, often presenting significant diagnostic and research challenges due to an extremely heterogenic symptomology and pathology. The differential for catatonia is further complicated by distinct, non-catatonic medical mimics of catatonia that present similarly. We propose a new delineation of medical mimics of catatonia and an approach to differential diagnosis that will better account for the complexities of catatonia and its mimics, ultimately leading to more clinically relevant outcomes.

Methods: We obtained all case reports and case series from a Regional Medical Center in a 6-month period. All patients were diagnosed initially with F06.1 Catatonia. All patients had assessments with Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale and the KANNER catatonia rating scale. Data included diagnoses, comorbidities, treatment approaches, and outcomes.

Results: We found 12 cases that met the inclusion criteria. We identified the primary diagnosis of catatonia and comorbid diagnoses. There were 3 case studies, 4 case series (N=2), and 1 presentation. Six of the 12 had co-existing medical conditions that are classified as medical mimics of catatonia. The treatment approach, diagnostic workup, and outcomes were available for all cases.

Conclusions: Our finding of 50% medical mimics in our study of catatonia is analogous to encountering Viceroys in the Butterfly Garden with the Monarchs. The medical mimics, the Viceroys, are often excluded from the study of catatonia, the Monarchs, and reduce the study population. Nonetheless, the Viceroys encountered on psychiatric units, outpatient clinics, emergency rooms and consultation-liaison services still warrant assessment and treatment.

总督在花园里与帝王蝶:紧张症的医学模拟。
目的:紧张症是一种病因多样的神经精神综合征,由于其异常异质性的症状和病理,常常给诊断和研究带来重大挑战。紧张症的区别是进一步复杂的不同,非紧张症的医学模拟紧张症,表现相似。我们提出了一种新的描述紧张症的医学模拟和鉴别诊断的方法,这将更好地解释紧张症及其模拟的复杂性,最终导致更多的临床相关结果。方法:我们收集了一家地区医疗中心6个月期间的所有病例报告和病例系列。所有患者最初诊断为F06.1紧张症。所有患者均采用Bush-Francis紧张症评定量表和KANNER紧张症评定量表进行评定。数据包括诊断、合并症、治疗方法和结果。结果:12例符合纳入标准。我们确定了紧张症的初步诊断和合并症的诊断。有3个病例研究,4个病例系列(N=2)和1个报告。12人中有6人同时患有被归类为紧张症医学模拟的疾病。所有病例的治疗方法、诊断检查和结果均可获得。结论:在我们的紧张症研究中,我们发现50%的医学模拟类似于在蝴蝶花园遇到总督和君主。医学模仿者,总督,经常被排除在紧张症的研究之外,君主,减少了研究人口。尽管如此,在精神病院、门诊诊所、急诊室和咨询联络服务中遇到的总督仍然需要进行评估和治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Neuropharmacology
Clinical Neuropharmacology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Neuropharmacology is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to the pharmacology of the nervous system in its broadest sense. Coverage ranges from such basic aspects as mechanisms of action, structure-activity relationships, and drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, to practical clinical problems such as drug interactions, drug toxicity, and therapy for specific syndromes and symptoms. The journal publishes original articles and brief reports, invited and submitted reviews, and letters to the editor. A regular feature is the Patient Management Series: in-depth case presentations with clinical questions and answers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信