Predicting patient deterioration with physiological data using AI: systematic review protocol.

IF 4.4 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Lynsey Threlfall, Cen Cong, Victoria Riccalton, Edward Meinert, Chris Plummer
{"title":"Predicting patient deterioration with physiological data using AI: systematic review protocol.","authors":"Lynsey Threlfall, Cen Cong, Victoria Riccalton, Edward Meinert, Chris Plummer","doi":"10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The second iteration of the National Early Warning Score has been adopted widely within the UK and internationally. It uses routinely collected physiological measurements to standardise the assessment and response to acute illness. Its use is associated with reduced mortality but has limited positive and negative predictive accuracy. There is a growing body of research demonstrating the effectiveness of artificial intelligence (AI) in predicting clinical deterioration, but there is limited evidence to show which aspect of AI is best suited to this task. This systematic review aims to establish which AI or machine learning algorithm is best suited to analysing physiological data sets to predict patient deterioration in a hospital setting.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>A systematic review will be conducted in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) and the PICOS (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome and Study) frameworks. Eight databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, IEEE Xplore and ACM Digital Library) will be used to search for studies published from 2007 to the present that meet the inclusion criteria. Two reviewers will screen the studies identified and extract data independently, with any discrepancies resolved by discussion. The review is expected to be completed by January 2026, and the results will be presented in publication by June 2026.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>Ethical approval is not required as data will be obtained from published sources. Findings from this study will be disseminated via publication in a peer-reviewed journal.</p>","PeriodicalId":9050,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12336570/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The second iteration of the National Early Warning Score has been adopted widely within the UK and internationally. It uses routinely collected physiological measurements to standardise the assessment and response to acute illness. Its use is associated with reduced mortality but has limited positive and negative predictive accuracy. There is a growing body of research demonstrating the effectiveness of artificial intelligence (AI) in predicting clinical deterioration, but there is limited evidence to show which aspect of AI is best suited to this task. This systematic review aims to establish which AI or machine learning algorithm is best suited to analysing physiological data sets to predict patient deterioration in a hospital setting.

Methods and analysis: A systematic review will be conducted in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) and the PICOS (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome and Study) frameworks. Eight databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, IEEE Xplore and ACM Digital Library) will be used to search for studies published from 2007 to the present that meet the inclusion criteria. Two reviewers will screen the studies identified and extract data independently, with any discrepancies resolved by discussion. The review is expected to be completed by January 2026, and the results will be presented in publication by June 2026.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not required as data will be obtained from published sources. Findings from this study will be disseminated via publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

利用人工智能生理数据预测患者病情恶化:系统评价方案。
简介:国家早期预警评分的第二次迭代已在英国和国际上广泛采用。它使用常规收集的生理测量来标准化对急性疾病的评估和反应。它的使用与死亡率降低有关,但具有有限的正面和负面预测准确性。越来越多的研究表明人工智能(AI)在预测临床恶化方面的有效性,但很少有证据表明人工智能的哪一方面最适合这项任务。本系统综述旨在确定哪种人工智能或机器学习算法最适合分析医院环境中的生理数据集,以预测患者的病情恶化。方法和分析:将按照PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目)和PICOS(人口、干预、比较物、结果和研究)框架进行系统评价。8个数据库(PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, IEEE Xplore和ACM Digital Library)将被用于搜索2007年至今发表的符合纳入标准的研究。两名审稿人将筛选确定的研究并独立提取数据,任何差异通过讨论解决。评估预计将于2026年1月完成,结果将于2026年6月公布。伦理和传播:由于数据将从已发表的来源获得,因此不需要伦理批准。本研究结果将在同行评议的期刊上发表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
40
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信