COVID-19 Vaccine Adverse Events by Country Income Level: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Poliana do Carmo Pimenta, Thais Cristina de Aquino Lima, Vitoria Gabriele Souza Geraldine, Fillipe Silva Tourinho, Murilo César do Nascimento, Rômulo Dias Novaes, Lívia Maris Ribeiro Paranaíba Dias
{"title":"COVID-19 Vaccine Adverse Events by Country Income Level: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Poliana do Carmo Pimenta, Thais Cristina de Aquino Lima, Vitoria Gabriele Souza Geraldine, Fillipe Silva Tourinho, Murilo César do Nascimento, Rômulo Dias Novaes, Lívia Maris Ribeiro Paranaíba Dias","doi":"10.1177/08901171251365229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeTo synthesize evidence on the incidence of COVID-19 vaccine-related adverse events across countries by income level.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.SettingStudies published 2020-2025, retrieved from EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, and Scopus.SampleEleven trials with 7841 participants; seven from high-income and four from upper-middle-income countries.MeasuresIncidence per 100 vaccinated. Countries by income: low (≤$1145), lower-middle ($1146-4515), upper-middle ($4516-14,005), high (>$14,005). Inter-reviewer agreement assessed by kappa (0.684). Risk of bias evaluated with Cochrane RoB 2.AnalysisMantel-Haenszel random-effects models estimated relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals. Heterogeneity assessed by I<sup>2</sup>. Subgroup analyses by income and dose.ResultsAEFI incidence was consistently higher in high-income vs upper-middle-income countries, especially after dose 2. Injection-site pain (68.1 vs 26.3 per 100), headache (45.7 vs 14.1), myalgia (42.5 vs 9.2), and fatigue (33.8 vs 11.4) were most common. Meta-analyses showed higher pooled RR in high-income settings: any AEFI after dose 1, RR = 1.83 (95% CI: 1.39-2.42); local, RR = 3.15; systemic, RR = 2.05. After dose 2, overall RR reached 2.94; local, 4.37; systemic, 2.48. All subgroup differences were significant.ConclusionHigher-income countries showed a greater incidence of mostly mild adverse events, particularly after the second dose. mRNA vaccines had the highest rates. Findings reveal income-based disparities and inform equitable post-vaccination monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"8901171251365229"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171251365229","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeTo synthesize evidence on the incidence of COVID-19 vaccine-related adverse events across countries by income level.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.SettingStudies published 2020-2025, retrieved from EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, and Scopus.SampleEleven trials with 7841 participants; seven from high-income and four from upper-middle-income countries.MeasuresIncidence per 100 vaccinated. Countries by income: low (≤$1145), lower-middle ($1146-4515), upper-middle ($4516-14,005), high (>$14,005). Inter-reviewer agreement assessed by kappa (0.684). Risk of bias evaluated with Cochrane RoB 2.AnalysisMantel-Haenszel random-effects models estimated relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals. Heterogeneity assessed by I2. Subgroup analyses by income and dose.ResultsAEFI incidence was consistently higher in high-income vs upper-middle-income countries, especially after dose 2. Injection-site pain (68.1 vs 26.3 per 100), headache (45.7 vs 14.1), myalgia (42.5 vs 9.2), and fatigue (33.8 vs 11.4) were most common. Meta-analyses showed higher pooled RR in high-income settings: any AEFI after dose 1, RR = 1.83 (95% CI: 1.39-2.42); local, RR = 3.15; systemic, RR = 2.05. After dose 2, overall RR reached 2.94; local, 4.37; systemic, 2.48. All subgroup differences were significant.ConclusionHigher-income countries showed a greater incidence of mostly mild adverse events, particularly after the second dose. mRNA vaccines had the highest rates. Findings reveal income-based disparities and inform equitable post-vaccination monitoring.

按国家收入水平划分的COVID-19疫苗不良事件:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
目的按收入水平综合各国COVID-19疫苗相关不良事件发生率的证据。设计随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。研究发表2020-2025年,检索自EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE,和Scopus。11项试验,7841名受试者;7名来自高收入国家,4名来自中高收入国家。每100名接种者的发病率。按收入划分的国家:低(≤1145美元)、中下(1146-4515美元)、中上(4516- 14005美元)、高(100 - 14005美元)。通过kappa(0.684)评估审稿人间的一致性。用Cochrane rob2评价偏倚风险。mantel - haenszel随机效应模型以95%的置信区间估计相对风险(RR)。异质性由I2评估。按收入和剂量分组分析。结果高收入国家的saefi发生率始终高于中高收入国家,特别是在第2次剂量后。注射部位疼痛(68.1 vs 26.3 / 100)、头痛(45.7 vs 14.1)、肌痛(42.5 vs 9.2)和疲劳(33.8 vs 11.4)是最常见的。荟萃分析显示,在高收入环境中,合并RR更高:1次剂量后的任何AEFI, RR = 1.83 (95% CI: 1.39-2.42);local, RR = 3.15;系统性,RR = 2.05。剂量2后,总RR达到2.94;本地的,4.37;系统性的,2.48。各亚组差异均显著。结论在高收入国家,大多数轻度不良事件的发生率较高,特别是在第二次接种后。mRNA疫苗的感染率最高。研究结果揭示了基于收入的差异,并为公平的疫苗接种后监测提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Health Promotion
American Journal of Health Promotion PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The editorial goal of the American Journal of Health Promotion is to provide a forum for exchange among the many disciplines involved in health promotion and an interface between researchers and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信