Using Safety-I, II, and III to level up patient safety.

IF 2.1
Aubrey Samost-Williams, Karolina Brook
{"title":"Using Safety-I, II, and III to level up patient safety.","authors":"Aubrey Samost-Williams, Karolina Brook","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review provides clinicians with an introduction to the theories underlying safety-I, II, and III. These are concepts that have recently been adapted to healthcare and are growing in popularity among patient safety experts. Clinicians will be encountering patient safety interventions and analyses rooted in these theories, making an understanding of the safety science behind them important.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>There is a growing body of literature analyzing safety-I, II, and III in healthcare as well as multiple recently published applied case studies.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Safety-I, II, and III are complementary ways of considering how accidents occur and how systems can build safety. Safety-I assumes that accidents occur through linear chains of events, prompting searches for root causes of accidents. Safety-II is grounded in resilience engineering and posits that accidents occur due to variability, but variability can also be protective as people prevent harm from reaching patients. Safety-III assumes that safety emerges from the interactions of the people, software, and hardware in the system as they work to control their behavior within safe bounds. These three unique lenses on safety offer different lessons learned from accidents and different strategies to promote patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":520600,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in anaesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000001560","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: This review provides clinicians with an introduction to the theories underlying safety-I, II, and III. These are concepts that have recently been adapted to healthcare and are growing in popularity among patient safety experts. Clinicians will be encountering patient safety interventions and analyses rooted in these theories, making an understanding of the safety science behind them important.

Recent findings: There is a growing body of literature analyzing safety-I, II, and III in healthcare as well as multiple recently published applied case studies.

Summary: Safety-I, II, and III are complementary ways of considering how accidents occur and how systems can build safety. Safety-I assumes that accidents occur through linear chains of events, prompting searches for root causes of accidents. Safety-II is grounded in resilience engineering and posits that accidents occur due to variability, but variability can also be protective as people prevent harm from reaching patients. Safety-III assumes that safety emerges from the interactions of the people, software, and hardware in the system as they work to control their behavior within safe bounds. These three unique lenses on safety offer different lessons learned from accidents and different strategies to promote patient safety.

使用safety - i, II和III来提高患者的安全性。
综述的目的:本综述为临床医生提供了安全性基础理论的介绍- i、II和III。这些概念最近被应用于医疗保健领域,在患者安全专家中越来越受欢迎。临床医生将遇到基于这些理论的患者安全干预和分析,这使得理解其背后的安全科学变得重要。最近的发现:越来越多的文献分析了医疗保健中的安全性- i、II和III,以及最近发表的多个应用案例研究。总结:安全- i、II和III是考虑事故如何发生以及系统如何建立安全的互补方式。安全- i假设事故是通过事件的线性链发生的,促使人们寻找事故的根本原因。Safety-II以弹性工程为基础,并假定事故是由于可变性而发生的,但可变性也可以起到保护作用,因为人们可以防止伤害到达患者。安全性- iii假设安全来自于系统中人员、软件和硬件在安全范围内控制其行为时的相互作用。这三种独特的安全视角提供了从事故中吸取的不同教训和促进患者安全的不同策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信