Exercise professionals in extended scope of practice roles: a qualitative exploration of a new model of rehabilitation.

BMJ public health Pub Date : 2025-08-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjph-2024-002322
Sheree McCormick, Iva Cukic, Jenny Alexanders, Gillian Yeowell, Francis Fatoye, Benjamin M Kelly, Victoria Fitzgerald, Tim Cable, Patrick Doherty, Davina Deniszczyc, Panayiotis Michael
{"title":"Exercise professionals in extended scope of practice roles: a qualitative exploration of a new model of rehabilitation.","authors":"Sheree McCormick, Iva Cukic, Jenny Alexanders, Gillian Yeowell, Francis Fatoye, Benjamin M Kelly, Victoria Fitzgerald, Tim Cable, Patrick Doherty, Davina Deniszczyc, Panayiotis Michael","doi":"10.1136/bmjph-2024-002322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a need to provide greater patient choice through accessible and sustainable rehabilitation for people with long-term conditions. New models of rehabilitation employing non-clinical healthcare workers in extended service practice roles are developing. Little research has investigated the experiences of non-clinical health workers, such as exercise professionals, in extended scope of practice roles. This research explored the experiences of stakeholders and beneficiaries (exercise professionals in extended scope of practice roles, allied health professionals and people with Long COVID) participating in a new model of rehabilitation delivered online from selected Fitness and Well-being Centres of a UK charity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative design using in-depth semistructured interviews was undertaken to explore the experiences of triage physiotherapists, specialist trained exercise professionals, referred to as rehabilitation specialists and people with Long COVID participating in the new model of rehabilitation involving exercise, education and well-being support.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five triage physiotherapists, two rehabilitation specialists and three people with Long COVID were recruited. Facilitators, barriers and opportunities were identified as key themes. Facilitators related to 'it isn't just exercise', 'condition specific needs are met' and 'dedicated team who make a difference'. Barriers related to 'supporting staff training needs' and 'optimising resources/mode of delivery for clinical population'. Opportunities related to the provision of a 'stepped-down approach at programme end', 'building and developing the team', and 'identifying and evaluating emerging trends through process evluations'.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This novel model of rehabilitation provided positive experiences for people living with Long COVID. Some aspects of the role provided job satisfaction for the delivery team but mentorship, support and additional training in psychological skills and mental health are important when considering sustainability and expansion of the programme. Scaling out to other clinical populations and areas where access to conventional services is sparse could provide a viable public health strategy to improve access to services, thereby reducing mainstream healthcare costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":101362,"journal":{"name":"BMJ public health","volume":"3 2","pages":"e002322"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12320046/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2024-002322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is a need to provide greater patient choice through accessible and sustainable rehabilitation for people with long-term conditions. New models of rehabilitation employing non-clinical healthcare workers in extended service practice roles are developing. Little research has investigated the experiences of non-clinical health workers, such as exercise professionals, in extended scope of practice roles. This research explored the experiences of stakeholders and beneficiaries (exercise professionals in extended scope of practice roles, allied health professionals and people with Long COVID) participating in a new model of rehabilitation delivered online from selected Fitness and Well-being Centres of a UK charity.

Methods: A qualitative design using in-depth semistructured interviews was undertaken to explore the experiences of triage physiotherapists, specialist trained exercise professionals, referred to as rehabilitation specialists and people with Long COVID participating in the new model of rehabilitation involving exercise, education and well-being support.

Results: Five triage physiotherapists, two rehabilitation specialists and three people with Long COVID were recruited. Facilitators, barriers and opportunities were identified as key themes. Facilitators related to 'it isn't just exercise', 'condition specific needs are met' and 'dedicated team who make a difference'. Barriers related to 'supporting staff training needs' and 'optimising resources/mode of delivery for clinical population'. Opportunities related to the provision of a 'stepped-down approach at programme end', 'building and developing the team', and 'identifying and evaluating emerging trends through process evluations'.

Conclusions: This novel model of rehabilitation provided positive experiences for people living with Long COVID. Some aspects of the role provided job satisfaction for the delivery team but mentorship, support and additional training in psychological skills and mental health are important when considering sustainability and expansion of the programme. Scaling out to other clinical populations and areas where access to conventional services is sparse could provide a viable public health strategy to improve access to services, thereby reducing mainstream healthcare costs.

Abstract Image

运动专业人员在拓展实践范围中的作用:一种康复新模式的定性探索。
背景:有必要通过可获得和可持续的康复为长期疾病患者提供更多的患者选择。采用非临床卫生保健工作者担任扩展服务实践角色的康复新模式正在发展。很少有研究调查非临床卫生工作者的经验,如运动专业人员,在扩大范围的实践角色。本研究探讨了利益相关者和受益者(扩展实践角色范围的运动专业人员,联合卫生专业人员和长COVID患者)参与英国慈善机构选定的健身和福祉中心在线提供的新康复模式的经验。方法:采用深度半结构化访谈的定性设计,探讨分诊物理治疗师、专业训练的运动专业人员(简称康复专家)和长冠肺炎患者参与涉及运动、教育和福祉支持的新型康复模式的经验。结果:招募到分诊物理治疗师5名,康复专家2名,长冠患者3名。推动者、障碍和机会被确定为关键主题。促进者涉及到“不仅仅是锻炼”,“特定条件的需求得到满足”和“专门的团队做出改变”。与“支持员工培训需求”和“为临床人群优化资源/交付模式”相关的障碍。与提供“在项目结束时逐步减少的方法”、“建立和发展团队”以及“通过过程评估识别和评估新趋势”相关的机会。结论:这种新型的康复模式为长期COVID患者提供了积极的体验。该角色的某些方面为执行小组提供了工作满意度,但在考虑方案的可持续性和扩大时,心理技能和心理健康方面的指导、支持和额外培训很重要。扩大到其他临床人群和获得传统服务的机会很少的地区,可以提供一种可行的公共卫生战略,以改善获得服务的机会,从而降低主流医疗保健成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信