A comparison of electrophysiological measures for characterizing the cochlear-implant electrode-neuron interface.

IF 1.4 Q3 ACOUSTICS
Charlotte Garcia, Fergio Sismono, Tobias Goehring, François Guérit, Dorothée Arzounian, Robert P Carlyon
{"title":"A comparison of electrophysiological measures for characterizing the cochlear-implant electrode-neuron interface.","authors":"Charlotte Garcia, Fergio Sismono, Tobias Goehring, François Guérit, Dorothée Arzounian, Robert P Carlyon","doi":"10.1121/10.0038746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The health of the auditory nerve is a key factor for hearing outcomes in cochlear-implant patients. Many electrophysiological markers of auditory-neural health have been proposed, with varying predictive power and independence from non-neural factors. The \"Failure Index\" (FI), the ratio between stimulation current level and response magnitude of the electrically-evoked compound action potential (eCAP) was compared to the Panoramic eCAP method. Both methods predicted localized areas of reduced neural responsiveness in a group of human cochlear-implant users, but the FI showed a greater dependence on a non-neural factor, namely, the distances between the cochlear-implant electrodes and the auditory nerves.</p>","PeriodicalId":73538,"journal":{"name":"JASA express letters","volume":"5 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12333378/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JASA express letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0038746","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The health of the auditory nerve is a key factor for hearing outcomes in cochlear-implant patients. Many electrophysiological markers of auditory-neural health have been proposed, with varying predictive power and independence from non-neural factors. The "Failure Index" (FI), the ratio between stimulation current level and response magnitude of the electrically-evoked compound action potential (eCAP) was compared to the Panoramic eCAP method. Both methods predicted localized areas of reduced neural responsiveness in a group of human cochlear-implant users, but the FI showed a greater dependence on a non-neural factor, namely, the distances between the cochlear-implant electrodes and the auditory nerves.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

表征耳蜗-植入体电极-神经元界面的电生理指标比较。
听神经的健康状况是影响人工耳蜗患者听力预后的关键因素。许多听觉神经健康的电生理指标已被提出,具有不同的预测能力和独立于非神经因素。“失效指数”(FI),即刺激电流水平与电诱发复合动作电位(eCAP)的响应幅度之比,与全景eCAP方法进行比较。这两种方法都预测了人工耳蜗使用者神经反应性降低的局部区域,但FI更依赖于非神经因素,即人工耳蜗电极与听神经之间的距离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信