Efficacy of cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine on symptoms not responsive to levodopa in patients affected by Parkinson's disease without dementia: a systematic review.

IF 2.4 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
BMJ Neurology Open Pub Date : 2025-08-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjno-2025-001079
Ilaria Cani, Nicola Grotteschi, Giovanna Calandra-Buonaura, Maria Guarino, Pietro Guaraldi, Giulia Giannini, Luca Baldelli, Monia Donati, Pietro Cortelli, Maria Domenica Camerlingo, Francesco Nonino, Luisa Sambati
{"title":"Efficacy of cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine on symptoms not responsive to levodopa in patients affected by Parkinson's disease without dementia: a systematic review.","authors":"Ilaria Cani, Nicola Grotteschi, Giovanna Calandra-Buonaura, Maria Guarino, Pietro Guaraldi, Giulia Giannini, Luca Baldelli, Monia Donati, Pietro Cortelli, Maria Domenica Camerlingo, Francesco Nonino, Luisa Sambati","doi":"10.1136/bmjno-2025-001079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Parkinson's disease (PD) is primarily characterised by parkinsonism due to nigro-striatal dopaminergic denervation. While therapeutic strategies have traditionally focused on compensating for dopaminergic deficit, growing evidence reveals an involvement of cholinergic and glutamatergic pathways in the pathogenesis of the motor and non-motor manifestations of the disease. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the efficacy of cholinesterase inhibitors (ChIs) and memantine (glutamate receptor antagonist) in patients affected by PD without dementia on motor (gait, balance) and non-motor (cognitive, behavioural, sleep and autonomic) symptoms usually poorly responsive to levodopa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted. The search was performed on PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase databases for articles published between January 1996 and October 2024, using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Results are presented narratively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>12 RCTs were included in this review, with 10 (774 patients) focusing on ChIs and 2 (65 patients) on memantine. Some studies highlighted the beneficial effects of ChI on mild cognitive impairment and suggested potential improvements in apathy and gait disturbances. However, the findings regarding the impact of ChI and memantine on other non-motor symptoms were inconsistent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Available RCTs suggest that ChIs may have a valuable role in managing cognitive impairment, apathy and gait disorders in PD patients without dementia. However, due to the lack of strong evidence, a cautious and individualised approach is advisable when considering these treatments.Cite Now.</p>","PeriodicalId":52754,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Neurology Open","volume":"7 2","pages":"e001079"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12320054/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Neurology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjno-2025-001079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Parkinson's disease (PD) is primarily characterised by parkinsonism due to nigro-striatal dopaminergic denervation. While therapeutic strategies have traditionally focused on compensating for dopaminergic deficit, growing evidence reveals an involvement of cholinergic and glutamatergic pathways in the pathogenesis of the motor and non-motor manifestations of the disease. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the efficacy of cholinesterase inhibitors (ChIs) and memantine (glutamate receptor antagonist) in patients affected by PD without dementia on motor (gait, balance) and non-motor (cognitive, behavioural, sleep and autonomic) symptoms usually poorly responsive to levodopa.

Methods: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted. The search was performed on PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase databases for articles published between January 1996 and October 2024, using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Results are presented narratively.

Results: 12 RCTs were included in this review, with 10 (774 patients) focusing on ChIs and 2 (65 patients) on memantine. Some studies highlighted the beneficial effects of ChI on mild cognitive impairment and suggested potential improvements in apathy and gait disturbances. However, the findings regarding the impact of ChI and memantine on other non-motor symptoms were inconsistent.

Conclusions: Available RCTs suggest that ChIs may have a valuable role in managing cognitive impairment, apathy and gait disorders in PD patients without dementia. However, due to the lack of strong evidence, a cautious and individualised approach is advisable when considering these treatments.Cite Now.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

胆碱酯酶抑制剂和美金刚对无痴呆帕金森病患者左旋多巴无反应症状的疗效:一项系统综述
背景:帕金森病(PD)的主要特征是由黑质纹状体多巴胺能失神经支配引起的帕金森病。虽然治疗策略传统上侧重于补偿多巴胺能缺陷,但越来越多的证据表明,胆碱能和谷氨酸能途径参与了该疾病的运动和非运动表现的发病机制。本综述的目的是概述胆碱酯酶抑制剂(ChIs)和美金刚(谷氨酸受体拮抗剂)对运动(步态、平衡)和非运动(认知、行为、睡眠和自主神经)症状对左旋多巴反应不佳的PD无痴呆患者的疗效。方法:对随机对照试验(RCTs)进行系统评价。在PubMed、Cochrane Library和Embase数据库中检索1996年1月至2024年10月间发表的文章,使用预定义的纳入和排除标准。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。结果以叙述的方式呈现。结果:本综述纳入了12项随机对照试验,其中10项(774例)关注ChIs, 2项(65例)关注美金刚。一些研究强调了ChI对轻度认知障碍的有益作用,并提出了对冷漠和步态障碍的潜在改善。然而,关于乙酰胆碱和美金刚对其他非运动症状的影响的研究结果不一致。结论:现有的随机对照试验表明,ChIs可能在治疗无痴呆PD患者的认知障碍、冷漠和步态障碍方面发挥重要作用。然而,由于缺乏强有力的证据,在考虑这些治疗方法时,建议采取谨慎和个性化的方法。现在引用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Neurology Open
BMJ Neurology Open Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
46
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信