Early prediction of proton therapy dose distributions and DVHs for hepatocellular carcinoma using contour-based CNN models from diagnostic CT and MRI.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Toshiya Rachi, Taku Tochinai
{"title":"Early prediction of proton therapy dose distributions and DVHs for hepatocellular carcinoma using contour-based CNN models from diagnostic CT and MRI.","authors":"Toshiya Rachi, Taku Tochinai","doi":"10.1186/s13014-025-02708-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Proton therapy is commonly used for treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, its feasibility can be challenging to assess in large tumors or those adjacent to critical organs at risk (OARs), which are typically assessed only after planning computed tomography (CT) acquisition. This study aimed to predict proton dose distributions using diagnostic CT (dCT) and diagnostic MRI (dMRI) with a convolutional neural network (CNN), enabling early treatment feasibility assessments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Dose distributions and dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were calculated for 118 patients with HCC using intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and passive proton therapy. A CPU-based CNN model was used to predict DVHs and 3D dose distributions from diagnostic images. Prediction accuracy was evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity index (SSIM), and gamma passing rate with a 3 mm/3% criterion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The predicted DVHs and dose distributions showed high agreement with actual values. MAE remained below 3.0%, with passive techniques achieving 1.2-1.8%. MSE was below 0.004 in all cases. PSNR ranged from 24 to 28 dB, and SSIM exceeded 0.94 in most conditions. Gamma passing rates averaged 82-83% for IMPT and 92-93% for passive techniques. The model achieved comparable accuracy when using dMRI and dCT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates that early dose distribution prediction from diagnostic imaging is feasible and accurate using a lightweight CNN model. Despite anatomical variability between diagnostic and planning images, this approach provides timely insights into treatment feasibility, potentially supporting insurance pre-authorization, reducing unnecessary imaging, and optimizing clinical workflows for HCC proton therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":"20 1","pages":"122"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12323130/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-025-02708-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Proton therapy is commonly used for treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, its feasibility can be challenging to assess in large tumors or those adjacent to critical organs at risk (OARs), which are typically assessed only after planning computed tomography (CT) acquisition. This study aimed to predict proton dose distributions using diagnostic CT (dCT) and diagnostic MRI (dMRI) with a convolutional neural network (CNN), enabling early treatment feasibility assessments.

Methods: Dose distributions and dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were calculated for 118 patients with HCC using intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and passive proton therapy. A CPU-based CNN model was used to predict DVHs and 3D dose distributions from diagnostic images. Prediction accuracy was evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity index (SSIM), and gamma passing rate with a 3 mm/3% criterion.

Results: The predicted DVHs and dose distributions showed high agreement with actual values. MAE remained below 3.0%, with passive techniques achieving 1.2-1.8%. MSE was below 0.004 in all cases. PSNR ranged from 24 to 28 dB, and SSIM exceeded 0.94 in most conditions. Gamma passing rates averaged 82-83% for IMPT and 92-93% for passive techniques. The model achieved comparable accuracy when using dMRI and dCT.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that early dose distribution prediction from diagnostic imaging is feasible and accurate using a lightweight CNN model. Despite anatomical variability between diagnostic and planning images, this approach provides timely insights into treatment feasibility, potentially supporting insurance pre-authorization, reducing unnecessary imaging, and optimizing clinical workflows for HCC proton therapy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

诊断性CT和MRI基于轮廓的CNN模型早期预测肝癌质子治疗剂量分布和dvh。
背景:质子治疗通常用于治疗肝细胞癌(HCC);然而,评估其在大肿瘤或危险关键器官(OARs)附近的可行性具有挑战性,通常只有在计划计算机断层扫描(CT)采集后才能评估。本研究旨在利用卷积神经网络(CNN)预测诊断性CT (dCT)和诊断性MRI (dMRI)的质子剂量分布,从而进行早期治疗可行性评估。方法:计算118例HCC患者分别采用调强质子治疗(IMPT)和被动质子治疗的剂量分布和剂量-体积直方图(DVHs)。使用基于cpu的CNN模型预测诊断图像的dvh和3D剂量分布。采用平均绝对误差(MAE)、均方误差(MSE)、峰值信噪比(PSNR)、结构相似指数(SSIM)和gamma通过率(3 mm/3%)标准评估预测准确性。结果:预测DVHs和剂量分布与实际值吻合度较高。MAE保持在3.0%以下,被动技术达到1.2-1.8%。MSE均小于0.004。PSNR在24 ~ 28 dB之间,SSIM在0.94以上。IMPT的平均通过率为82-83%,被动技术为92-93%。当使用dMRI和dCT时,该模型达到了相当的准确性。结论:本研究表明,使用轻量级CNN模型从诊断影像中预测早期剂量分布是可行和准确的。尽管诊断图像和计划图像之间存在解剖差异,但该方法可以及时了解治疗可行性,潜在地支持保险预授权,减少不必要的成像,并优化HCC质子治疗的临床工作流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiation Oncology
Radiation Oncology ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.80%
发文量
181
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiation Oncology encompasses all aspects of research that impacts on the treatment of cancer using radiation. It publishes findings in molecular and cellular radiation biology, radiation physics, radiation technology, and clinical oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信