Core Outcome Set for Studies on Cardiac Disease in Pregnancy (COSCarP): An International Delphi Consensus Study.

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Rizwana Ashraf, Yun Zhi He, Candice K Silversides, Samuel C Siu, Mathew Sermer, Anish Keepanasseril, Meron Seyoum, Isabelle Malhamé, Rohan D'Souza
{"title":"Core Outcome Set for Studies on Cardiac Disease in Pregnancy (COSCarP): An International Delphi Consensus Study.","authors":"Rizwana Ashraf, Yun Zhi He, Candice K Silversides, Samuel C Siu, Mathew Sermer, Anish Keepanasseril, Meron Seyoum, Isabelle Malhamé, Rohan D'Souza","doi":"10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Outcome reporting in cardio-obstetrics studies is inconsistent. The objective of the COSCarP (Core Outcome Set on Cardiac Diseases in Pregnancy) study was to develop a core outcome set through international consensus and harmonize outcome reporting in cardio-obstetrics studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multimethod study between February 2021 and April 2023 that included an online 2-round Delphi survey, 3 small group discussions and a consensus meeting with health service users (people with lived experience of pregnancy and heart disease) and health care professionals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 110 participants (22 health service users and 88 health care professionals) from 13 countries in Africa, Asia, Europe, and North America scored 71 candidate items obtained through literature reviews and qualitative interviews. Participants identified 12 core outcomes and 12 core reporting checklist items (which may not always represent outcomes) for inclusion in all cardio-obstetrics studies. Core outcomes included: maternal mortality, cardiac arrest, cerebrovascular events, heart failure, arrhythmias requiring treatment or change in treatment, thromboembolism, syncope, maternal intensive care unit admission, cardiovascular interventions, fetal/neonatal loss (miscarriage, stillbirth, neonatal death), severe neonatal morbidity, and prolonged neonatal intensive care unit admission. Reporting checklist items included: hypertensive disorders, major bleeding, anesthetic complications, adverse reactions, labor and birth details, maternal hospitalization and re-admissions, treatment compliance, fetal growth restriction, congenital malformations, gestational age at birth, and nonsevere neonatal morbidity. Participants also identified 7 condition-specific outcomes and 7 other patient-important outcomes, which may be challenging to measure in all studies and should be reported when feasible and relevant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The COSCarP study has identified core outcomes, reporting checklist items, and patient-important outcomes, which researchers are encouraged to measure and report in future cardio-obstetrics studies. Widespread use of the COSCarP checklists could support data harmonization, enable meaningful comparisons between studies, facilitate meta-analyses, and ensure that future guidelines incorporate patient-important outcomes while making clinical practice recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":49221,"journal":{"name":"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":"e011754"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011754","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Outcome reporting in cardio-obstetrics studies is inconsistent. The objective of the COSCarP (Core Outcome Set on Cardiac Diseases in Pregnancy) study was to develop a core outcome set through international consensus and harmonize outcome reporting in cardio-obstetrics studies.

Methods: We conducted a multimethod study between February 2021 and April 2023 that included an online 2-round Delphi survey, 3 small group discussions and a consensus meeting with health service users (people with lived experience of pregnancy and heart disease) and health care professionals.

Results: A total of 110 participants (22 health service users and 88 health care professionals) from 13 countries in Africa, Asia, Europe, and North America scored 71 candidate items obtained through literature reviews and qualitative interviews. Participants identified 12 core outcomes and 12 core reporting checklist items (which may not always represent outcomes) for inclusion in all cardio-obstetrics studies. Core outcomes included: maternal mortality, cardiac arrest, cerebrovascular events, heart failure, arrhythmias requiring treatment or change in treatment, thromboembolism, syncope, maternal intensive care unit admission, cardiovascular interventions, fetal/neonatal loss (miscarriage, stillbirth, neonatal death), severe neonatal morbidity, and prolonged neonatal intensive care unit admission. Reporting checklist items included: hypertensive disorders, major bleeding, anesthetic complications, adverse reactions, labor and birth details, maternal hospitalization and re-admissions, treatment compliance, fetal growth restriction, congenital malformations, gestational age at birth, and nonsevere neonatal morbidity. Participants also identified 7 condition-specific outcomes and 7 other patient-important outcomes, which may be challenging to measure in all studies and should be reported when feasible and relevant.

Conclusions: The COSCarP study has identified core outcomes, reporting checklist items, and patient-important outcomes, which researchers are encouraged to measure and report in future cardio-obstetrics studies. Widespread use of the COSCarP checklists could support data harmonization, enable meaningful comparisons between studies, facilitate meta-analyses, and ensure that future guidelines incorporate patient-important outcomes while making clinical practice recommendations.

妊娠期心脏病研究的核心结局集(COSCarP):一项国际德尔菲共识研究。
背景:心产科学研究的结果报告不一致。COSCarP研究(妊娠期心脏疾病核心结局集)的目的是通过国际共识制定核心结局集,并协调心脏-产科研究的结果报告。方法:我们于2021年2月至2023年4月进行了一项多方法研究,包括在线2轮德尔菲调查,3次小组讨论和卫生服务用户(有怀孕和心脏病生活经历的人)和卫生保健专业人员的共识会议。结果:来自非洲、亚洲、欧洲和北美13个国家的110名参与者(22名卫生服务使用者和88名卫生保健专业人员)对通过文献综述和定性访谈获得的71个候选项目进行评分。参与者确定了12个核心结果和12个核心报告清单项目(可能并不总是代表结果),以纳入所有心脏产科研究。核心结局包括:孕产妇死亡率、心脏骤停、脑血管事件、心力衰竭、需要治疗或改变治疗的心律失常、血栓栓塞、晕厥、孕产妇重症监护病房入院、心血管干预、围产期损失(流产、死产、新生儿死亡)、新生儿严重发病率和新生儿重症监护病房住院时间延长。报告清单项目包括:高血压疾病、大出血、麻醉并发症、不良反应、分娩和分娩细节、产妇住院和再入院、治疗依从性、胎儿生长受限、先天性畸形、出生胎龄和非严重新生儿发病率。参与者还确定了7个特定疾病的结果和7个其他患者重要的结果,这些结果可能在所有研究中都具有挑战性,应在可行和相关的情况下报告。结论:COSCarP研究确定了核心结果、报告清单项目和患者重要结果,鼓励研究人员在未来的心产科学研究中测量和报告这些结果。COSCarP检查表的广泛使用可以支持数据协调,使研究之间能够进行有意义的比较,促进荟萃分析,并确保未来的指南在提出临床实践建议时纳入对患者重要的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
357
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, an American Heart Association journal, publishes articles related to improving cardiovascular health and health care. Content includes original research, reviews, and case studies relevant to clinical decision-making and healthcare policy. The online-only journal is dedicated to furthering the mission of promoting safe, effective, efficient, equitable, timely, and patient-centered care. Through its articles and contributions, the journal equips you with the knowledge you need to improve clinical care and population health, and allows you to engage in scholarly activities of consequence to the health of the public. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes considers the following types of articles: Original Research Articles, Data Reports, Methods Papers, Cardiovascular Perspectives, Care Innovations, Novel Statistical Methods, Policy Briefs, Data Visualizations, and Caregiver or Patient Viewpoints.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信