Comparison between the ultrasound guided pericapsular nerve group block and anterior quadratus lumborum block in elderly patients undergoing total hip replacement surgeries: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Ahmed Elshall, Osama Asaad, Bassant M Abdelhamid, Alaa F Abd Elbadei, Mohamed A Ollaek
{"title":"Comparison between the ultrasound guided pericapsular nerve group block and anterior quadratus lumborum block in elderly patients undergoing total hip replacement surgeries: a randomized controlled clinical trial.","authors":"Ahmed Elshall, Osama Asaad, Bassant M Abdelhamid, Alaa F Abd Elbadei, Mohamed A Ollaek","doi":"10.23736/S0375-9393.25.18883-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To compare the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and anterior quadratus lumborum block (AQLB) in elderly patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized, controlled trial included 93 patients aged 65 years or older with traumatic hip fractures, scheduled for elective unilateral THA under general anesthesia. Patients were randomized into three groups: PENG group (N.=31), AQLB group (N.=31), and a control group (N.=31), which received only opioid analgesia. The primary outcome was total morphine consumption within the first 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative fentanyl use, time to first rescue analgesia, block failure rate, pain scores at rest and during movement, motor recovery (muscle strength and hip flexion), time to first ambulation, and length of hospital stay. Additional assessments involved intraoperative hemodynamic monitoring, block-related and morphine-related complications, as well as block performance time and duration of surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AQLB group showed the least total morphine consumption (median 6.0 mg), followed by the PENG group (median 8.0 mg), with a significant difference between the two groups (P=0.035). Both PENG and AQLB groups showed a significantly lower total morphine consumption than the control group (median=12.0 mg). The Numeric Pain Rating Scale at rest showed significant differences between \"AQLB versus Control\" till 4 hours postoperative, and between \"PENG versus Control\" at all-time points except at 6, 8, and 18 hours. The AQLB group showed the lowest scores for the manual muscle test for the quadriceps and Iliopsoas muscles and for the range of motion with significant differences between AQLB and PENG. Furthermore, the time to first walk was significantly longer among the AQLB group (median 24 h) in comparison to the PENG group (median 8 h). The PENG displayed the shortest hospital stay period (2.13 days), followed by the control group (2.94 days), and then the AQLB group (3.16 days), with significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While the PENG block facilitated earlier mobilization and shorter hospital stays, the AQLB offered superior analgesia and reduced opioid consumption. Both techniques proved effective, with the choice depending on clinical priorities such as pain control versus early recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":18522,"journal":{"name":"Minerva anestesiologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva anestesiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.25.18883-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To compare the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and anterior quadratus lumborum block (AQLB) in elderly patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Methods: This randomized, controlled trial included 93 patients aged 65 years or older with traumatic hip fractures, scheduled for elective unilateral THA under general anesthesia. Patients were randomized into three groups: PENG group (N.=31), AQLB group (N.=31), and a control group (N.=31), which received only opioid analgesia. The primary outcome was total morphine consumption within the first 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative fentanyl use, time to first rescue analgesia, block failure rate, pain scores at rest and during movement, motor recovery (muscle strength and hip flexion), time to first ambulation, and length of hospital stay. Additional assessments involved intraoperative hemodynamic monitoring, block-related and morphine-related complications, as well as block performance time and duration of surgery.

Results: The AQLB group showed the least total morphine consumption (median 6.0 mg), followed by the PENG group (median 8.0 mg), with a significant difference between the two groups (P=0.035). Both PENG and AQLB groups showed a significantly lower total morphine consumption than the control group (median=12.0 mg). The Numeric Pain Rating Scale at rest showed significant differences between "AQLB versus Control" till 4 hours postoperative, and between "PENG versus Control" at all-time points except at 6, 8, and 18 hours. The AQLB group showed the lowest scores for the manual muscle test for the quadriceps and Iliopsoas muscles and for the range of motion with significant differences between AQLB and PENG. Furthermore, the time to first walk was significantly longer among the AQLB group (median 24 h) in comparison to the PENG group (median 8 h). The PENG displayed the shortest hospital stay period (2.13 days), followed by the control group (2.94 days), and then the AQLB group (3.16 days), with significant differences.

Conclusions: While the PENG block facilitated earlier mobilization and shorter hospital stays, the AQLB offered superior analgesia and reduced opioid consumption. Both techniques proved effective, with the choice depending on clinical priorities such as pain control versus early recovery.

超声引导下囊周神经群阻滞与腰前方肌阻滞在老年全髋关节置换术中的比较:一项随机对照临床试验。
背景:比较超声引导下囊周神经组(PENG)阻滞与腰前方肌阻滞(AQLB)在老年全髋关节置换术(THA)患者中的安全性和有效性。方法:本随机对照试验纳入93例65岁及以上外伤性髋部骨折患者,计划在全身麻醉下择期单侧THA。将患者随机分为3组:PENG组(n =31)、AQLB组(n =31)和对照组(n =31),仅给予阿片类镇痛。主要观察指标为术后24小时内吗啡总消耗量。次要结局包括术中芬太尼使用、首次抢救镇痛时间、阻滞失败率、休息和运动时疼痛评分、运动恢复(肌肉力量和髋关节屈曲)、首次下床时间和住院时间。其他评估包括术中血流动力学监测、阻滞相关和吗啡相关并发症、阻滞执行时间和手术持续时间。结果:AQLB组吗啡总用量最小(中位6.0 mg),其次为PENG组(中位8.0 mg),两组间差异有统计学意义(P=0.035)。PENG组和AQLB组吗啡总用量均显著低于对照组(中位数=12.0 mg)。休息时数值疼痛评定量表显示,术后4小时“AQLB与对照组”之间以及除6、8和18小时外的所有时间点“PENG与对照组”之间存在显著差异。AQLB组在股四头肌和髂腰肌的手动肌肉测试以及运动范围方面得分最低,AQLB组与PENG组之间存在显著差异。此外,与PENG组(中位8小时)相比,AQLB组(中位24小时)的首次行走时间明显更长。彭组住院时间最短(2.13天),对照组最短(2.94天),AQLB组最短(3.16天),差异有统计学意义。结论:虽然PENG阻滞促进了更早的活动和更短的住院时间,但AQLB提供了更好的镇痛效果并减少了阿片类药物的消耗。这两种技术都被证明是有效的,选择取决于临床优先级,如疼痛控制和早期恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva anestesiologica
Minerva anestesiologica 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
21.90%
发文量
367
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Minerva Anestesiologica is the journal of the Italian National Society of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care. Minerva Anestesiologica publishes scientific papers on Anesthesiology, Intensive care, Analgesia, Perioperative Medicine and related fields. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信