Impact of Aspiration Thrombectomy on Microvascular Obstruction in Patients With ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

IF 1.3 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of the Saudi Heart Association Pub Date : 2025-07-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.37616/2212-5043.1447
Mahmoud Ismaiel, Mohamed Shehata, Tamer Elwasify, Mohamed Hosny, Amir Anwar, Tarek A N Ahmed, Abdalla Elagha
{"title":"Impact of Aspiration Thrombectomy on Microvascular Obstruction in Patients With ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.","authors":"Mahmoud Ismaiel, Mohamed Shehata, Tamer Elwasify, Mohamed Hosny, Amir Anwar, Tarek A N Ahmed, Abdalla Elagha","doi":"10.37616/2212-5043.1447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is the gold standard for myocardial reperfusion in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Numerous studies have shown that thrombus aspiration can prevent distal embolization and reducing the risk of microvascular obstruction (MVO). Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is considered the gold standard for the evaluation of MVO.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of thrombus aspiration in STEMI patients as an adjunctive technique to primary PCI in reducing both incidence and extent of MVO evaluated by CMR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety-three patients with heavy thrombus burden were enrolled in this study; sixty-five patients met our inclusion criteria. After failed trial of restore the artery patency, aspiration thrombectomy was done followed by PCI for thirty-one patients (aspiration group), while conventional PCI without aspiration thrombectomy was performed for 34 patients (conventional group). The primary end points were both occurrence and extent of microvascular obstruction (MVO) evaluated mainly by CMR, in addition to angiographic data (MBG and TIMI flow grade).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of microvascular obstruction (MVO) was significantly higher in conventional group (18 patients, 52.9 %) when compared with aspiration group (7 patients, 22.6 %; p-value = 0.012). Moreover, significant differences existed between the studied groups regarding MVO extent. For instance, MVO extended to >4 segments in only 3 patients (9.7 %) in aspiration group, but in 13 patients in conventional group (38.2 %; p-value = 0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Aspiration thrombectomy substantially reduces both the incidence and extent of microvascular obstruction as an adjunctive technique to PPCI in STEMI patients with heavy thrombus burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":17319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Saudi Heart Association","volume":"37 3","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12320986/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Saudi Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37616/2212-5043.1447","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is the gold standard for myocardial reperfusion in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Numerous studies have shown that thrombus aspiration can prevent distal embolization and reducing the risk of microvascular obstruction (MVO). Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is considered the gold standard for the evaluation of MVO.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of thrombus aspiration in STEMI patients as an adjunctive technique to primary PCI in reducing both incidence and extent of MVO evaluated by CMR.

Methods: Ninety-three patients with heavy thrombus burden were enrolled in this study; sixty-five patients met our inclusion criteria. After failed trial of restore the artery patency, aspiration thrombectomy was done followed by PCI for thirty-one patients (aspiration group), while conventional PCI without aspiration thrombectomy was performed for 34 patients (conventional group). The primary end points were both occurrence and extent of microvascular obstruction (MVO) evaluated mainly by CMR, in addition to angiographic data (MBG and TIMI flow grade).

Results: The incidence of microvascular obstruction (MVO) was significantly higher in conventional group (18 patients, 52.9 %) when compared with aspiration group (7 patients, 22.6 %; p-value = 0.012). Moreover, significant differences existed between the studied groups regarding MVO extent. For instance, MVO extended to >4 segments in only 3 patients (9.7 %) in aspiration group, but in 13 patients in conventional group (38.2 %; p-value = 0.007).

Conclusions: Aspiration thrombectomy substantially reduces both the incidence and extent of microvascular obstruction as an adjunctive technique to PPCI in STEMI patients with heavy thrombus burden.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

st段抬高型心肌梗死患者吸入性取栓对微血管阻塞的影响
背景:首次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI)是st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)心肌再灌注的金标准。大量研究表明,血栓抽吸可以防止远端栓塞,降低微血管阻塞(MVO)的风险。心脏磁共振(CMR)被认为是评价MVO的金标准。目的:本研究的目的是评估STEMI患者血栓抽吸作为初级PCI辅助技术在降低CMR评估的MVO发生率和程度方面的效果。方法:入选93例血栓负担重的患者;65例患者符合我们的纳入标准。恢复动脉通畅试验失败后,31例患者行吸入性取栓后PCI治疗(吸入性组),34例患者行常规PCI治疗,不行吸入性取栓治疗(常规组)。除了血管造影数据(MBG和TIMI血流等级)外,主要终点是微血管阻塞(MVO)的发生和程度,主要由CMR评估。结果:常规组微血管阻塞发生率(18例,52.9%)明显高于抽吸组(7例,22.6%;p值= 0.012)。此外,研究组间MVO程度存在显著差异。例如,抽吸组只有3例(9.7%)患者的MVO扩展到bb40节段,而常规组有13例(38.2%);p值= 0.007)。结论:抽吸取栓术作为重度血栓负担STEMI患者PPCI的辅助技术,可显著降低微血管阻塞的发生率和程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Saudi Heart Association
Journal of the Saudi Heart Association CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信