Rafael Reis de Oliveira, Yasmin Picanço Silva, Yusuf-Zain Ansari, Mariana Letícia de Bastos Maximiano, Leonardo B O Brenner, Iago Nathan Simon Petry, Mariana Lee Han, Júlia Dos Santos Monteiro, Raphael Leal Dias da Silva, Laiana Neves Cordeiro Cavalcanti, Ocílio Ribeiro Gonçalves, Walter Fagundes
{"title":"Decompressive craniectomy versus best medical treatment alone for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Rafael Reis de Oliveira, Yasmin Picanço Silva, Yusuf-Zain Ansari, Mariana Letícia de Bastos Maximiano, Leonardo B O Brenner, Iago Nathan Simon Petry, Mariana Lee Han, Júlia Dos Santos Monteiro, Raphael Leal Dias da Silva, Laiana Neves Cordeiro Cavalcanti, Ocílio Ribeiro Gonçalves, Walter Fagundes","doi":"10.1177/17474930251367367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While managing spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) has advanced, achieving favorable outcomes remains challenging. Recent studies suggest that decompressive craniectomy (DC) may offer benefits over conservative treatment, consisting of the best medical treatment (BMT) in certain sICH cases.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to compare DC to BMT alone for sICH regarding functional neurological outcomes, mortality, and length of hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Randomized and observational studies were identified comparing surgery (DC) to conservative management alone for patients with sICH. The outcomes analyzed were modified Rankin Scale (mRS), mortality at 30 days, 90 days, and overall mortality, and length of hospital stay. The odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) were calculated for binary and continuous outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis included eight studies (n = 743), with 345 patients undergoing surgery and 398 undergoing conservative management. BMT alone was associated with a poor neurological function (mRS of 5-6) (OR = 0.44; 95% CI = 0.24-0.78; p-value = 0.005; I<sup>2</sup> = 39.8%), while the rate of good neurological function (mRS = 0-4) was superior in the surgical cohort (OR = 2.29; 95% CI = 1.28-4.10; p = 0.005; I<sup>2</sup> = 39.8%), despite the lack of statistical significance for mRS 0-2 (OR = 1.25; 95% CI = 0.47-3.33; p = 0.66; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) and mRS 0-3 (OR = 1.43; 95% CI = 0.82-2.51; p = 0.21; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Conservative management was associated with higher mortality at 30 days (OR = 0.36; 95% CI = 0.19-0.66; p-value = 0.001; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%), at 90 days (OR = 0.35; 95% CI = 0.14-0.86; p = 0.022; I<sup>2</sup> = 68.7%), and at last follow-up (OR = 0.33; 95% CI = 0.21-0.52; p-value < 0.001; I<sup>2</sup> = 34.8%). Length of hospital stay was superior in the DC cohort, but without statistical significance (MD = 16.05; 95% CI = -3.24 to 35.34; p-value = 0.1; I<sup>2</sup> = 92.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with sICH, decompressive craniectomy shows potential for reducing mortality and improving neurological function compared to BMT alone. Further randomized studies, with improved methods, are needed to increase the quality of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":14442,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Stroke","volume":" ","pages":"17474930251367367"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930251367367","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: While managing spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) has advanced, achieving favorable outcomes remains challenging. Recent studies suggest that decompressive craniectomy (DC) may offer benefits over conservative treatment, consisting of the best medical treatment (BMT) in certain sICH cases.
Aim: This study aims to compare DC to BMT alone for sICH regarding functional neurological outcomes, mortality, and length of hospitalization.
Methods: Randomized and observational studies were identified comparing surgery (DC) to conservative management alone for patients with sICH. The outcomes analyzed were modified Rankin Scale (mRS), mortality at 30 days, 90 days, and overall mortality, and length of hospital stay. The odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) were calculated for binary and continuous outcomes.
Results: Our analysis included eight studies (n = 743), with 345 patients undergoing surgery and 398 undergoing conservative management. BMT alone was associated with a poor neurological function (mRS of 5-6) (OR = 0.44; 95% CI = 0.24-0.78; p-value = 0.005; I2 = 39.8%), while the rate of good neurological function (mRS = 0-4) was superior in the surgical cohort (OR = 2.29; 95% CI = 1.28-4.10; p = 0.005; I2 = 39.8%), despite the lack of statistical significance for mRS 0-2 (OR = 1.25; 95% CI = 0.47-3.33; p = 0.66; I2 = 0%) and mRS 0-3 (OR = 1.43; 95% CI = 0.82-2.51; p = 0.21; I2 = 0%). Conservative management was associated with higher mortality at 30 days (OR = 0.36; 95% CI = 0.19-0.66; p-value = 0.001; I2 = 0%), at 90 days (OR = 0.35; 95% CI = 0.14-0.86; p = 0.022; I2 = 68.7%), and at last follow-up (OR = 0.33; 95% CI = 0.21-0.52; p-value < 0.001; I2 = 34.8%). Length of hospital stay was superior in the DC cohort, but without statistical significance (MD = 16.05; 95% CI = -3.24 to 35.34; p-value = 0.1; I2 = 92.9%).
Conclusions: In patients with sICH, decompressive craniectomy shows potential for reducing mortality and improving neurological function compared to BMT alone. Further randomized studies, with improved methods, are needed to increase the quality of evidence.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Stroke is a welcome addition to the international stroke journal landscape in that it concentrates on the clinical aspects of stroke with basic science contributions in areas of clinical interest. Reviews of current topics are broadly based to encompass not only recent advances of global interest but also those which may be more important in certain regions and the journal regularly features items of news interest from all parts of the world. To facilitate the international nature of the journal, our Associate Editors from Europe, Asia, North America and South America coordinate segments of the journal.