Bridging the gap: monthly telephone calls to enhance collaboration between primary care physicians and psychiatrists.

IF 1.6 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Kamini Vasudev, Stephanie Fernando
{"title":"Bridging the gap: monthly telephone calls to enhance collaboration between primary care physicians and psychiatrists.","authors":"Kamini Vasudev, Stephanie Fernando","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The integration of mental health services within primary care settings is a growing priority in Canada, driven by the need to improve access and ensure comprehensive patient-centred care. This year-long pilot quality improvement (QI) project was conducted to examine the feasibility and impact of introducing monthly telephone consultations between primary care physicians (PCPs) and psychiatrists working at a secondary care regional hospital in Ontario, Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PCPs were connected with a team of psychiatrists via email on a voluntary basis. Once connected, PCPs were encouraged to contact psychiatrists by text or email to book monthly telephone consultation for patient care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of seven PCPs and five psychiatrists participated in this project. A total of 66 patients were discussed via telephone consultations between PCPs and psychiatrists and 11 of these patients were referred to psychiatry for further assessment. The number of referrals to psychiatry O-P service from the seven PCPs involved in this pilot decreased from 83 for the period of November 2021 to October 2022 to 53 for the period of this project, that is, November 2022 to October 2023.There were initial challenges in scheduling consultations due to busy practices. After the first few months of regular monthly contact, three psychiatrists reported fewer ongoing contacts with PCPs and that PCPs email them on an as needed basis. Two psychiatrists continued to have ongoing 4-6 weeks contact with their assigned PCP, discussing on average 3-4 patients, after 1 year.Psychiatrists found the telephone meetings productive and the PCPs were appreciative of the support provided and were willing to take over the primary care of some patients under the care of the psychiatrists, who had medical needs but no PCP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This pilot QI project confirms the feasibility and successful collaborations between PCPs and psychiatrists through monthly phone calls.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12323526/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The integration of mental health services within primary care settings is a growing priority in Canada, driven by the need to improve access and ensure comprehensive patient-centred care. This year-long pilot quality improvement (QI) project was conducted to examine the feasibility and impact of introducing monthly telephone consultations between primary care physicians (PCPs) and psychiatrists working at a secondary care regional hospital in Ontario, Canada.

Methods: PCPs were connected with a team of psychiatrists via email on a voluntary basis. Once connected, PCPs were encouraged to contact psychiatrists by text or email to book monthly telephone consultation for patient care.

Results: A total of seven PCPs and five psychiatrists participated in this project. A total of 66 patients were discussed via telephone consultations between PCPs and psychiatrists and 11 of these patients were referred to psychiatry for further assessment. The number of referrals to psychiatry O-P service from the seven PCPs involved in this pilot decreased from 83 for the period of November 2021 to October 2022 to 53 for the period of this project, that is, November 2022 to October 2023.There were initial challenges in scheduling consultations due to busy practices. After the first few months of regular monthly contact, three psychiatrists reported fewer ongoing contacts with PCPs and that PCPs email them on an as needed basis. Two psychiatrists continued to have ongoing 4-6 weeks contact with their assigned PCP, discussing on average 3-4 patients, after 1 year.Psychiatrists found the telephone meetings productive and the PCPs were appreciative of the support provided and were willing to take over the primary care of some patients under the care of the psychiatrists, who had medical needs but no PCP.

Conclusion: This pilot QI project confirms the feasibility and successful collaborations between PCPs and psychiatrists through monthly phone calls.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

弥合差距:每月打电话加强初级保健医生和精神科医生之间的合作。
背景:在加拿大,由于需要改善获得和确保以病人为中心的全面护理,将精神卫生服务纳入初级保健机构日益成为一项优先事项。开展这一为期一年的质量改进试点项目是为了检查在加拿大安大略省一家二级保健地区医院的初级保健医生和精神科医生之间引入每月电话会诊的可行性和影响。方法:pcp在自愿的基础上通过电子邮件与一组精神科医生联系。一旦联系上,pcp被鼓励通过短信或电子邮件联系精神科医生,预约每月的电话咨询,以进行病人护理。结果:共有7名pcp和5名精神科医生参与本项目。共有66名患者通过pcp和精神科医生之间的电话咨询进行了讨论,其中11名患者被转介到精神科进行进一步评估。参与该试点项目的7家pcp转介到精神科O-P服务的人数从2021年11月至2022年10月期间的83人减少到该项目期间的53人,即2022年11月至2023年10月。由于工作繁忙,最初在安排磋商时间方面存在挑战。在最初几个月的每月定期联系之后,三名精神病医生报告说,与pcp的持续联系减少了,pcp根据需要给他们发电子邮件。一年后,两名精神科医生继续与他们指定的PCP进行持续4-6周的接触,平均讨论3-4名患者。精神科医生发现电话会议很有成效,PCP对所提供的支持表示感谢,并愿意在精神科医生的照顾下接管一些病人的初级护理,这些病人有医疗需求,但没有PCP。结论:这一试点项目通过每月的电话交流,证实了pcp和精神科医生之间合作的可行性和成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信