Aidan Sharkey, Adnan A Khan, Shirin Saeed, Rayaan Ahmed Yunus, Usman Ahmed, Adil Al-Karim Manji, Ruma Bose, Kamal Khabbaz, Feroze Mahmood, Robina Matyal
{"title":"Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Enhanced Recovery in Cardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Observational Study.","authors":"Aidan Sharkey, Adnan A Khan, Shirin Saeed, Rayaan Ahmed Yunus, Usman Ahmed, Adil Al-Karim Manji, Ruma Bose, Kamal Khabbaz, Feroze Mahmood, Robina Matyal","doi":"10.4103/aca.aca_244_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This retrospective observational study evaluates the effect of incorporating peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) into an established enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. The PNBs used included pecto-intercostal fascial block (PIFB) and rectus sheath block, performed under ultrasound guidance with the administration of a long-acting local anesthetic, Ropivacaine. Both patient and process outcomes were assessed to determine the effect PNBs have as part of an ERAS protocol.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery with midline sternotomy who were expected to be extubated within 6 hours of arrival to the intensive care unit (ICU) between October 2022 and June 2023 were included. Patients were dichotomized by whether they received a PNB or not. Outcomes included opioid consumption as measured by morphine milligram equivalents (MME), ICU length of stay (LOS), postoperative mobility, and the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>431 patients were included: 170 (39.4%) received a PNB, and 243 (60.6%) did not (non-PNB group). Patients who received a PNB required a significantly shorter time to achieve first ambulation as measured from bed to chair (15.2 hours PNB vs. 18.5 hours non-PNB, P = 0.037), significantly lower rates of atrial fibrillation (26.5% PNB vs. 32.9% non-PNB, P = 0.045), shorter LOS in the ICU (44.4 hours PNB vs. 49.7 hours non-PNB, P = 0.024).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Incorporating PNBs as part of a multimodal analgesic strategy for patients undergoing cardiac surgical procedures is associated with improved patient and process outcomes. Our finding of a reduction in POAF warrants further investigation in an adequately powered randomized controlled trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":7997,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.aca_244_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: This retrospective observational study evaluates the effect of incorporating peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) into an established enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. The PNBs used included pecto-intercostal fascial block (PIFB) and rectus sheath block, performed under ultrasound guidance with the administration of a long-acting local anesthetic, Ropivacaine. Both patient and process outcomes were assessed to determine the effect PNBs have as part of an ERAS protocol.
Materials and methods: Adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery with midline sternotomy who were expected to be extubated within 6 hours of arrival to the intensive care unit (ICU) between October 2022 and June 2023 were included. Patients were dichotomized by whether they received a PNB or not. Outcomes included opioid consumption as measured by morphine milligram equivalents (MME), ICU length of stay (LOS), postoperative mobility, and the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF).
Results: 431 patients were included: 170 (39.4%) received a PNB, and 243 (60.6%) did not (non-PNB group). Patients who received a PNB required a significantly shorter time to achieve first ambulation as measured from bed to chair (15.2 hours PNB vs. 18.5 hours non-PNB, P = 0.037), significantly lower rates of atrial fibrillation (26.5% PNB vs. 32.9% non-PNB, P = 0.045), shorter LOS in the ICU (44.4 hours PNB vs. 49.7 hours non-PNB, P = 0.024).
Conclusion: Incorporating PNBs as part of a multimodal analgesic strategy for patients undergoing cardiac surgical procedures is associated with improved patient and process outcomes. Our finding of a reduction in POAF warrants further investigation in an adequately powered randomized controlled trial.
背景:本回顾性观察性研究评估将周围神经阻滞(PNBs)纳入既定的术后增强恢复(ERAS)方案的效果。使用的pnb包括胸肋间筋膜阻滞(PIFB)和直肌鞘阻滞,在超声引导下给予长效局麻药罗哌卡因。评估了患者和治疗结果,以确定pnb作为ERAS方案的一部分的效果。材料和方法:纳入2022年10月至2023年6月期间,预计在到达重症监护病房(ICU)后6小时内进行心脏手术并胸骨中线切开术的成年患者。根据是否接受了PNB对患者进行了分类。结果包括吗啡毫克当量(MME)测量的阿片类药物消耗、ICU住院时间(LOS)、术后活动能力和术后心房颤动(POAF)发生率。结果:纳入431例患者:170例(39.4%)接受了PNB, 243例(60.6%)未接受PNB(非PNB组)。接受PNB的患者实现从床到椅子的首次活动所需时间显著缩短(15.2小时PNB vs. 18.5小时非PNB, P = 0.037),房颤发生率显著降低(26.5% PNB vs. 32.9%非PNB, P = 0.045), ICU的LOS较短(44.4小时PNB vs. 49.7小时非PNB, P = 0.024)。结论:将pnb作为心脏外科手术患者多模式镇痛策略的一部分,可改善患者和手术过程的预后。我们发现POAF的减少值得在一项充分有力的随机对照试验中进一步调查。
期刊介绍:
Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia (ACA) is the official journal of the Indian Association of Cardiovascular Thoracic Anaesthesiologists. The journal is indexed with PubMed/MEDLINE, Excerpta Medica/EMBASE, IndMed and MedInd. The journal’s full text is online at www.annals.in. With the aim of faster and better dissemination of knowledge, we will be publishing articles ‘Ahead of Print’ immediately on acceptance. In addition, the journal would allow free access (Open Access) to its contents, which is likely to attract more readers and citations to articles published in ACA. Authors do not have to pay for submission, processing or publication of articles in ACA.