Intravenous Versus Inhaled Milrinone in Patients with Known Pulmonary Hypertension Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Abstract

Abstract: To summarize the evidence on the hemodynamic effects and vasopressor requirements of adult patients with known pulmonary hypertension (PH) undergoing cardiac surgery treated with intravenous and inhaled milrinone. A total of 400 patients in 5 prospective (4 RCT) studies were included for pooled analysis. There was no significant difference in the primary outcome; mean pulmonary artery pressure (MPAP) between groups (MD: -4.80, 95% CI -10.57 to 0.98). Inhaled milrinone was associated with a greater systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) (MD: 259.21, 95% CI 168.70 to 349.72) and reduction in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (MD: -4.64, 95% CI -5.47 to -3.81). There were no observable differences in mean arterial pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance, cardiac index, or central venous pressure. All studies included were assessed to be moderate/some concern risk of bias. Inhaled milrinone has not been shown to have a significant beneficial effect on MPAP and SVR when compared to intravenous milrinone in patients with known PH undergoing cardiac surgery. However, it has shown some benefits in maintaining MAP and improving oxygenation in this patient cohort. The study is limited by the bias of the included studies and the variability of inhaled drug dosage and administration timing, further well-powered randomized controlled trials are required.