{"title":"Evaluation of a patient decision aid for Japanese women with BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants: A preliminary study","authors":"Megumi Okawa, Naoko Arimori","doi":"10.1111/jjns.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to evaluate a decision aid for Japanese women (J-DA) with <i>BRCA1/2</i> pathogenic variants for supporting breast and ovarian cancer management decisions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study used a pre- and post-intervention design. The participants included Japanese women with <i>BRCA1/2</i> pathogenic variants who needed to make a decision regarding breast and ovarian cancer management options.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>All 25 participants completed the pre- and posttests. There was a significant reduction in the decisional conflict scale and a significant increase in the knowledge score. Significant improvements were identified in the decisional conflict scale score (<i>g</i> = 0.60, <i>p</i> = .002) and knowledge score (<i>g</i> = −1.44, <i>p</i> < .001). Four weeks post-intervention, 96% of the participants had made a decision regarding the management options for breast or ovarian care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The findings suggest that the decision aid (J-DA) positively supported the decision-making of the Japanese women with <i>BRCA1/2</i> pathogenic variants. As this study apparently represents the first evaluation of a decision aid for this population, subsequent studies are anticipated to further confirm its clinical applicability and utility.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50265,"journal":{"name":"Japan Journal of Nursing Science","volume":"22 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japan Journal of Nursing Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jjns.70017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim
This study aimed to evaluate a decision aid for Japanese women (J-DA) with BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants for supporting breast and ovarian cancer management decisions.
Methods
This study used a pre- and post-intervention design. The participants included Japanese women with BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants who needed to make a decision regarding breast and ovarian cancer management options.
Results
All 25 participants completed the pre- and posttests. There was a significant reduction in the decisional conflict scale and a significant increase in the knowledge score. Significant improvements were identified in the decisional conflict scale score (g = 0.60, p = .002) and knowledge score (g = −1.44, p < .001). Four weeks post-intervention, 96% of the participants had made a decision regarding the management options for breast or ovarian care.
Conclusions
The findings suggest that the decision aid (J-DA) positively supported the decision-making of the Japanese women with BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. As this study apparently represents the first evaluation of a decision aid for this population, subsequent studies are anticipated to further confirm its clinical applicability and utility.
期刊介绍:
The Japan Journal of Nursing Science is the official English language journal of the Japan Academy of Nursing Science. The purpose of the Journal is to provide a mechanism to share knowledge related to improving health care and promoting the development of nursing. The Journal seeks original manuscripts reporting scholarly work on the art and science of nursing. Original articles may be empirical and qualitative studies, review articles, methodological articles, brief reports, case studies and letters to the Editor. Please see Instructions for Authors for detailed authorship qualification requirement.