A novel regularization approach for loss functions to reduce instance imbalance in biomedical image segmentation

IF 3.1 4区 生物学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Muhammad Aqib Javed , Muhammad Khuram Shahzad , Hafiz Syed Muhammad Bilal Ali
{"title":"A novel regularization approach for loss functions to reduce instance imbalance in biomedical image segmentation","authors":"Muhammad Aqib Javed ,&nbsp;Muhammad Khuram Shahzad ,&nbsp;Hafiz Syed Muhammad Bilal Ali","doi":"10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2025.108555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Biomedical Image Segmentation applications have witnessed mushroom growth in the last two decades. Current state-of-the-art approaches face challenges when dealing with instance imbalances in datasets. Various functions, such as Blob Loss, Lesion-wise Loss, and Dice Loss limitations, were addressed by Instance-wise loss and Center-of-Instance loss (ICI). ICI is the result of Instance loss, and the center of instance loss suffers from highly unregulated labels and outputs, resulting in low accuracy of aforementioned loss functions. We introduce a novel dual-coefficient regularization approach for loss functions that modifies both predicted outputs and labels before loss computation. This addresses instance imbalance more effectively than previous pixel-level or class-level weighting strategies. The proposed approach resulted in the enhancement of existing loss functions: (1) RIW (regularized instance-wise loss), (2) RCI (regularized center of instance loss), and (3) RPW (regularized pixel-wise loss). The simulation experiments on the ATLAS R2.0 (MICCAI, 2022) and BraTS’20 (MICCAI, 2020) datasets validated our approach in comparison with the state-of-the-art loss functions resulting in significant improvements in RIW (up to 69.16%), RCI ( up to 16.58%), RPW (67.82%), subsequently decreased false detection rate up to (97.78%), and number of missed instances.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10616,"journal":{"name":"Computational Biology and Chemistry","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 108555"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Biology and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1476927125002154","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biomedical Image Segmentation applications have witnessed mushroom growth in the last two decades. Current state-of-the-art approaches face challenges when dealing with instance imbalances in datasets. Various functions, such as Blob Loss, Lesion-wise Loss, and Dice Loss limitations, were addressed by Instance-wise loss and Center-of-Instance loss (ICI). ICI is the result of Instance loss, and the center of instance loss suffers from highly unregulated labels and outputs, resulting in low accuracy of aforementioned loss functions. We introduce a novel dual-coefficient regularization approach for loss functions that modifies both predicted outputs and labels before loss computation. This addresses instance imbalance more effectively than previous pixel-level or class-level weighting strategies. The proposed approach resulted in the enhancement of existing loss functions: (1) RIW (regularized instance-wise loss), (2) RCI (regularized center of instance loss), and (3) RPW (regularized pixel-wise loss). The simulation experiments on the ATLAS R2.0 (MICCAI, 2022) and BraTS’20 (MICCAI, 2020) datasets validated our approach in comparison with the state-of-the-art loss functions resulting in significant improvements in RIW (up to 69.16%), RCI ( up to 16.58%), RPW (67.82%), subsequently decreased false detection rate up to (97.78%), and number of missed instances.

Abstract Image

一种用于减少生物医学图像分割中实例不平衡的损失函数正则化方法
在过去的二十年里,生物医学图像分割的应用得到了迅猛的发展。当前最先进的方法在处理数据集中的实例不平衡时面临挑战。各种功能,如Blob Loss、病变-wise Loss和骰子- Loss限制,通过实例-wise Loss和实例中心-of- instance Loss (ICI)解决。ICI是实例损失的结果,而实例损失中心的标签和输出高度不规范,导致上述损失函数的准确性较低。我们引入了一种新的双系数正则化方法,在损失计算之前修改预测输出和标签。这比以前的像素级或类级加权策略更有效地解决实例不平衡问题。提出的方法增强了现有的损失函数:(1)RIW(正则化实例损失),(2)RCI(正则化实例中心损失)和(3)RPW(正则化像素损失)。在ATLAS R2.0 (MICCAI, 2022)和BraTS ' 20 (MICCAI, 2020)数据集上的仿真实验验证了我们的方法,与最先进的损失函数相比,RIW(高达69.16%)、RCI(高达16.58%)、RPW(67.82%)显著提高,随后降低了误检率(高达97.78%),并减少了漏检实例的数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computational Biology and Chemistry
Computational Biology and Chemistry 生物-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
142
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Computational Biology and Chemistry publishes original research papers and review articles in all areas of computational life sciences. High quality research contributions with a major computational component in the areas of nucleic acid and protein sequence research, molecular evolution, molecular genetics (functional genomics and proteomics), theory and practice of either biology-specific or chemical-biology-specific modeling, and structural biology of nucleic acids and proteins are particularly welcome. Exceptionally high quality research work in bioinformatics, systems biology, ecology, computational pharmacology, metabolism, biomedical engineering, epidemiology, and statistical genetics will also be considered. Given their inherent uncertainty, protein modeling and molecular docking studies should be thoroughly validated. In the absence of experimental results for validation, the use of molecular dynamics simulations along with detailed free energy calculations, for example, should be used as complementary techniques to support the major conclusions. Submissions of premature modeling exercises without additional biological insights will not be considered. Review articles will generally be commissioned by the editors and should not be submitted to the journal without explicit invitation. However prospective authors are welcome to send a brief (one to three pages) synopsis, which will be evaluated by the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信