From Asymptomatic Flatfoot to Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity: Peritalar Subluxation Is the Main Driver of Symptoms.

Cesar de Cesar Netto,Nacime Salomão Barbachan Mansur,Grayson Talaski,Ryan P Jasper,Eli Schmidt,Kepler Alencar Mendes de Carvalho,Kevin Dibbern,Francois Lintz,Scott J Ellis,Donald Dean Anderson
{"title":"From Asymptomatic Flatfoot to Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity: Peritalar Subluxation Is the Main Driver of Symptoms.","authors":"Cesar de Cesar Netto,Nacime Salomão Barbachan Mansur,Grayson Talaski,Ryan P Jasper,Eli Schmidt,Kepler Alencar Mendes de Carvalho,Kevin Dibbern,Francois Lintz,Scott J Ellis,Donald Dean Anderson","doi":"10.2106/jbjs.24.01619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nFlatfoot, or pes planus, is a common anatomical variation marked by a reduced or absent longitudinal arch. Although it is often considered benign, the condition can progress to progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD), a debilitating pathology. This study aimed to identify imaging biomarkers that distinguish asymptomatic flatfoot from PCFD by comparing 3D measurements among normally aligned feet, asymptomatic flatfeet, and feet with PCFD.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA prospective, comparative, and controlled study was conducted on 561 feet in 475 subjects: 88 control subjects with 98 normally aligned feet, 66 control subjects with 132 asymptomatic flatfeet, and 321 patients with 331 feet with symptomatic PCFD. Bilateral weight-bearing computed tomography (WBCT) scans were performed, and various 3D measurements were analyzed, focusing on hindfoot valgus (Class A deformity), midfoot and/or forefoot abduction (Class B), arch collapse (Class C), and peritalar subluxation (PTS) (Class D). Statistical analysis, including multivariable nominal regression, was used to identify significant predictors of symptoms.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nProgressive increases in Class A, B, and C deformity parameters were observed from normally aligned feet to asymptomatic flatfeet and finally to feet with PCFD. Significant differences in PTS (Class D deformity) were found only in the comparison between the feet with PCFD and the control groups, with reduced joint coverage and increased sinus tarsi coverage, indicating extra-articular impingement. Multivariable analysis identified the minimum sinus tarsi distance as the strongest predictor of symptoms, with a threshold of 1.9 mm best distinguishing symptomatic from asymptomatic feet.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThis study demonstrated that although hindfoot valgus, midfoot and/or forefoot abduction, and arch collapse deformities progressively increase from normal alignment to PCFD, significant subtalar joint subluxation and sinus tarsi impingement were unique to symptomatic PCFD. These findings suggest that PTS can serve as a crucial biomarker for diagnosing pathologic flatfoot (PCFD) and differentiating it from asymptomatic flatfoot. Future research should explore the predictive value of PTS biomarkers in identifying flatfoot at high risk for collapse and their impact on clinical management and surgical decision-making.\r\n\r\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\r\nPrognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.","PeriodicalId":22625,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.24.01619","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Flatfoot, or pes planus, is a common anatomical variation marked by a reduced or absent longitudinal arch. Although it is often considered benign, the condition can progress to progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD), a debilitating pathology. This study aimed to identify imaging biomarkers that distinguish asymptomatic flatfoot from PCFD by comparing 3D measurements among normally aligned feet, asymptomatic flatfeet, and feet with PCFD. METHODS A prospective, comparative, and controlled study was conducted on 561 feet in 475 subjects: 88 control subjects with 98 normally aligned feet, 66 control subjects with 132 asymptomatic flatfeet, and 321 patients with 331 feet with symptomatic PCFD. Bilateral weight-bearing computed tomography (WBCT) scans were performed, and various 3D measurements were analyzed, focusing on hindfoot valgus (Class A deformity), midfoot and/or forefoot abduction (Class B), arch collapse (Class C), and peritalar subluxation (PTS) (Class D). Statistical analysis, including multivariable nominal regression, was used to identify significant predictors of symptoms. RESULTS Progressive increases in Class A, B, and C deformity parameters were observed from normally aligned feet to asymptomatic flatfeet and finally to feet with PCFD. Significant differences in PTS (Class D deformity) were found only in the comparison between the feet with PCFD and the control groups, with reduced joint coverage and increased sinus tarsi coverage, indicating extra-articular impingement. Multivariable analysis identified the minimum sinus tarsi distance as the strongest predictor of symptoms, with a threshold of 1.9 mm best distinguishing symptomatic from asymptomatic feet. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated that although hindfoot valgus, midfoot and/or forefoot abduction, and arch collapse deformities progressively increase from normal alignment to PCFD, significant subtalar joint subluxation and sinus tarsi impingement were unique to symptomatic PCFD. These findings suggest that PTS can serve as a crucial biomarker for diagnosing pathologic flatfoot (PCFD) and differentiating it from asymptomatic flatfoot. Future research should explore the predictive value of PTS biomarkers in identifying flatfoot at high risk for collapse and their impact on clinical management and surgical decision-making. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
从无症状扁平足到进行性塌陷足畸形:椎体周围半脱位是症状的主要驱动因素。
背景扁平足,或扁平足,是一种常见的解剖学变异,其特征是纵向足弓减少或缺失。虽然它通常被认为是良性的,但这种情况可以发展为进行性塌陷足畸形(PCFD),这是一种使人衰弱的病理。本研究旨在通过比较正常排列的足、无症状扁平足和有PCFD的足的3D测量,确定区分无症状扁平足和PCFD的成像生物标志物。方法对475名受试者的561足进行前瞻性、比较和对照研究:88名正常对齐足的对照受试者,66名无症状扁平足的对照受试者,以及321名有症状性PCFD的331足患者。进行了双侧负重计算机断层扫描(WBCT),并分析了各种3D测量结果,重点是后足外翻(A类畸形)、足中部和/或前足外展(B类)、足弓塌陷(C类)和肱骨周围半脱位(D类)。统计分析,包括多变量名义回归,被用来确定显著的症状预测因子。结果从正常排列足到无症状扁平足,最后到PCFD足,A、B和C类畸形参数逐渐增加。仅在PCFD足与对照组的比较中发现PTS (D类畸形)有显著差异,关节覆盖减少,跗骨窦覆盖增加,表明关节外撞击。多变量分析发现,跗窦最小距离是症状的最强预测因子,1.9 mm的阈值是区分有症状足和无症状足的最佳指标。结论本研究表明,虽然后足外翻、足中部和/或前足外展和足弓塌陷畸形从正常排列到PCFD逐渐增加,但明显的距下关节半脱位和跗骨窦撞击是症状性PCFD所特有的。这些发现表明PTS可以作为诊断病理性扁平足(PCFD)和区分其与无症状扁平足的重要生物标志物。未来的研究应探讨PTS生物标志物在识别塌陷高风险扁平足中的预测价值及其对临床管理和手术决策的影响。证据水平:预后II级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信