Updated demographics categories to capture the true diversity of an international registry of rare disease patients.

Therapeutic advances in rare disease Pub Date : 2025-07-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26330040251359676
Nicole Kressin, Michael E Shy, Tara Jones, Nidia Villalpando, Gita Ramdharry
{"title":"Updated demographics categories to capture the true diversity of an international registry of rare disease patients.","authors":"Nicole Kressin, Michael E Shy, Tara Jones, Nidia Villalpando, Gita Ramdharry","doi":"10.1177/26330040251359676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>NIH requires NIH-funded studies to use historical race and ethnicity categories-originally put forth by the Office of Management and Budget in 1997-for demographics collection. These historical categories were only designed for use within the United States (US). We speculated on the adequacy of these categories in capturing the true diversity of participants enrolled in the Inherited Neuropathy Consortium (INC), and their applicability for an international, broader rare disease population.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the feasibility and outcomes of using updated categories for rare disease patients that can be collapsed into the required historical categories.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was achieved by expanding on existing government categories from countries with INC sites to create categories that reached 100% consensus of the research team. Quantitative cross-sectional analysis was performed in two cohorts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Common government census categories among the US, the United Kingdom, Italy, and Australia were used to generate updated demographic categories capturing racial, ethnic, sex, and gender identities. We piloted the updated categories at three INC sites with participants who were participating in the INC. We made a minor update and sent the survey to anyone who had joined the Rare Disease Clinical Research Network's contact registry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both the pilot study and the contact registry saw an increase in diversity with the updated categories. The sex breakdown of the survey respondents was similar to that of the contact registry as a whole, but several participants were able to identify as nonbinary with the updated categories.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The updated categories allow researchers to provide a more inclusive race and ethnicity identification experience to participants. This may have implications for understanding differences in study populations that may translate to treatment response and has an overall aim to increase enrollment and adherence to observational research.</p>","PeriodicalId":75218,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic advances in rare disease","volume":"6 ","pages":"26330040251359676"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12317269/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic advances in rare disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26330040251359676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: NIH requires NIH-funded studies to use historical race and ethnicity categories-originally put forth by the Office of Management and Budget in 1997-for demographics collection. These historical categories were only designed for use within the United States (US). We speculated on the adequacy of these categories in capturing the true diversity of participants enrolled in the Inherited Neuropathy Consortium (INC), and their applicability for an international, broader rare disease population.

Objectives: To determine the feasibility and outcomes of using updated categories for rare disease patients that can be collapsed into the required historical categories.

Design: This was achieved by expanding on existing government categories from countries with INC sites to create categories that reached 100% consensus of the research team. Quantitative cross-sectional analysis was performed in two cohorts.

Methods: Common government census categories among the US, the United Kingdom, Italy, and Australia were used to generate updated demographic categories capturing racial, ethnic, sex, and gender identities. We piloted the updated categories at three INC sites with participants who were participating in the INC. We made a minor update and sent the survey to anyone who had joined the Rare Disease Clinical Research Network's contact registry.

Results: Both the pilot study and the contact registry saw an increase in diversity with the updated categories. The sex breakdown of the survey respondents was similar to that of the contact registry as a whole, but several participants were able to identify as nonbinary with the updated categories.

Discussion: The updated categories allow researchers to provide a more inclusive race and ethnicity identification experience to participants. This may have implications for understanding differences in study populations that may translate to treatment response and has an overall aim to increase enrollment and adherence to observational research.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

更新人口统计分类,以捕捉罕见病患者国际登记的真正多样性。
背景:美国国立卫生研究院要求美国国立卫生研究院资助的研究使用历史种族和民族分类-最初由管理和预算办公室于1997年提出-用于人口统计数据收集。这些历史分类仅设计用于在美国境内使用。我们推测这些分类是否充分反映了遗传性神经病变联盟(INC)参与者的真实多样性,以及它们对国际上更广泛的罕见疾病人群的适用性。目的:确定在罕见病患者中使用更新分类的可行性和结果,这些分类可以分解为所需的历史分类。设计:这是通过扩展现有的政府类别来实现的,这些类别来自拥有INC网站的国家,以创建达到研究团队100%共识的类别。在两个队列中进行定量横断面分析。方法:使用美国、英国、意大利和澳大利亚政府共同的人口普查类别来生成更新的人口统计类别,包括种族、民族、性别和性别身份。我们在三个INC站点与参与INC的参与者一起试用了更新的类别。我们做了一个小的更新,并将调查发送给任何加入罕见疾病临床研究网络联系注册表的人。结果:试点研究和接触登记都看到了更新类别的多样性增加。调查对象的性别分类与整个联系人注册表的性别分类相似,但有几个参与者能够通过更新的类别识别出非二元性。讨论:更新的分类允许研究人员为参与者提供更具包容性的种族和民族识别体验。这可能有助于理解研究人群的差异,这些差异可能转化为治疗反应,总体目标是增加观察性研究的入组率和依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信