Telehealth and plastic surgery: evaluation of the accessibility of virtual consultations through online resources.

IF 2.2 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
mHealth Pub Date : 2025-06-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.21037/mhealth-24-77
Alec S McCranie, Evan J Haas, Zain Aryanpour, Katie G Egan, Jason W Yu, Julian Winocour, David W Mathes, Christodoulos Kaoutzanis
{"title":"Telehealth and plastic surgery: evaluation of the accessibility of virtual consultations through online resources.","authors":"Alec S McCranie, Evan J Haas, Zain Aryanpour, Katie G Egan, Jason W Yu, Julian Winocour, David W Mathes, Christodoulos Kaoutzanis","doi":"10.21037/mhealth-24-77","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Telehealth has gained traction since the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‑CoV‑2) virus [coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)] pandemic. Telehealth is especially useful in plastic surgery, given the visual nature of many plastic surgery problems. However, research on the accessibility of virtual consultations in plastic surgery is limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accessibility of initial virtual consultations in academic and community-based plastic surgery practices through evaluation of online resources and to discuss the implications of these findings as they apply to patient access to care. We evaluated the websites of academic and community-based plastic surgery practices in the USA. All practices were contacted for confirmation of the availability of virtual consultation. Data was collected on practice characteristics, including region, availability of virtual consultations on practice websites, and types of services offered by community-based programs. Standard statistical analysis was performed using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. A total of 88 academic and 500 community-based plastic surgery practice websites were evaluated. Community-based practices offered more virtual consultations than academic practices (64.5% <i>vs.</i> 25.0%, P<0.001). As it pertains to telehealth marketing, overall availability of virtual consultations on the websites of academic and community-based practices was lacking and there was no difference between the two groups (21.6% <i>vs.</i> 13.8%, respectively, P=0.06). Community-based practices that offered only cosmetic surgery offered more virtual consultations than those that offered both cosmetic and reconstructive surgery (75.0% <i>vs.</i> 54.0%, P<0.001). Our findings suggest that community-based and academic plastic surgery practices are under-utilizing telehealth and telehealth marketing as it applies to virtual consultations. Despite the widespread adoption of telehealth since the COVID-19 pandemic, there is high variability in the accessibility of virtual consultations in plastic surgery across academic and community-based practices and broader implementation should be considered to increase transparency of services and accessibility to care.</p>","PeriodicalId":74181,"journal":{"name":"mHealth","volume":"11 ","pages":"33"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12314704/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"mHealth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth-24-77","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Telehealth has gained traction since the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‑CoV‑2) virus [coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)] pandemic. Telehealth is especially useful in plastic surgery, given the visual nature of many plastic surgery problems. However, research on the accessibility of virtual consultations in plastic surgery is limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accessibility of initial virtual consultations in academic and community-based plastic surgery practices through evaluation of online resources and to discuss the implications of these findings as they apply to patient access to care. We evaluated the websites of academic and community-based plastic surgery practices in the USA. All practices were contacted for confirmation of the availability of virtual consultation. Data was collected on practice characteristics, including region, availability of virtual consultations on practice websites, and types of services offered by community-based programs. Standard statistical analysis was performed using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. A total of 88 academic and 500 community-based plastic surgery practice websites were evaluated. Community-based practices offered more virtual consultations than academic practices (64.5% vs. 25.0%, P<0.001). As it pertains to telehealth marketing, overall availability of virtual consultations on the websites of academic and community-based practices was lacking and there was no difference between the two groups (21.6% vs. 13.8%, respectively, P=0.06). Community-based practices that offered only cosmetic surgery offered more virtual consultations than those that offered both cosmetic and reconstructive surgery (75.0% vs. 54.0%, P<0.001). Our findings suggest that community-based and academic plastic surgery practices are under-utilizing telehealth and telehealth marketing as it applies to virtual consultations. Despite the widespread adoption of telehealth since the COVID-19 pandemic, there is high variability in the accessibility of virtual consultations in plastic surgery across academic and community-based practices and broader implementation should be considered to increase transparency of services and accessibility to care.

Abstract Image

远程保健和整形外科:通过在线资源评估虚拟咨询的可及性。
自严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS - CoV - 2)病毒[2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)]大流行以来,远程医疗得到了广泛关注。考虑到许多整形手术问题的视觉性质,远程保健在整形手术中特别有用。然而,关于整形外科虚拟会诊的可及性的研究是有限的。本研究的目的是通过评估在线资源来评估学术和社区整形外科实践中初始虚拟咨询的可及性,并讨论这些发现在患者获得护理时的意义。我们评估了美国学术和社区整形手术实践的网站。已联系所有实践以确认虚拟咨询的可用性。收集了有关实践特征的数据,包括地区、实践网站上虚拟咨询的可用性以及社区项目提供的服务类型。采用卡方检验和Fisher精确检验进行标准统计分析。共有88个学术网站和500个社区整形外科实践网站进行了评估。社区实践提供了比学术实践更多的虚拟咨询(64.5% vs. 25.0%, P分别为13.8%,P=0.06)。仅提供美容手术的社区诊所比同时提供美容和重建手术的诊所提供了更多的虚拟咨询(75.0%对54.0%,P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信