Organizational health literacy of schools in Germany: results of a cross-sectional study.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Sandra Kirchhoff, Cara Krudewig, Orkan Okan
{"title":"Organizational health literacy of schools in Germany: results of a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Sandra Kirchhoff, Cara Krudewig, Orkan Okan","doi":"10.1093/heapro/daaf112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A social gradient in health literacy is prevalent in children and adolescents, with those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds often having lower levels. Interventions aiming at an entire setting, such as the organizational health literacy approach, seem promising to tackle these inequities. Schools represent unique environments to implement such interventions. The HeLit-Schools project aimed at developing an organizational health literacy framework for schools. The framework contains eight quality standards, each underpinned by six indicators, and was translated into a self-assessment tool (OHLS-Q). In this cross-sectional study, the German version of the OHLS-Q was used to assess the implementation status of organizational health literacy in schools in Germany for the first time. School management members completed the questionnaire via an online survey, including sociodemographic, personal, and school information. Descriptive statistics were reported. The n = 598 participants from five federal states were Ø 52.3 years old and mainly female (73.6%). 49.1% worked in primary, 37% in secondary, and 13.9% in special education schools. Overall, respondents reported that 65.1% of the standards and indicators of the framework were (rather) highly implemented. A great variance can be found between the individual standards and indicators. Schools already participating in school health promotion programs or networks showed a higher percentage of implementation across all standards. A lack of resources (financial, time, and personnel) is reported. The results reveal important insights into barriers and facilitators for the implementation of organizational health literacy in schools. Future studies should focus on interventions that overcome identified barriers, targeting specific standards and indicators.</p>","PeriodicalId":54256,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion International","volume":"40 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12318714/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daaf112","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A social gradient in health literacy is prevalent in children and adolescents, with those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds often having lower levels. Interventions aiming at an entire setting, such as the organizational health literacy approach, seem promising to tackle these inequities. Schools represent unique environments to implement such interventions. The HeLit-Schools project aimed at developing an organizational health literacy framework for schools. The framework contains eight quality standards, each underpinned by six indicators, and was translated into a self-assessment tool (OHLS-Q). In this cross-sectional study, the German version of the OHLS-Q was used to assess the implementation status of organizational health literacy in schools in Germany for the first time. School management members completed the questionnaire via an online survey, including sociodemographic, personal, and school information. Descriptive statistics were reported. The n = 598 participants from five federal states were Ø 52.3 years old and mainly female (73.6%). 49.1% worked in primary, 37% in secondary, and 13.9% in special education schools. Overall, respondents reported that 65.1% of the standards and indicators of the framework were (rather) highly implemented. A great variance can be found between the individual standards and indicators. Schools already participating in school health promotion programs or networks showed a higher percentage of implementation across all standards. A lack of resources (financial, time, and personnel) is reported. The results reveal important insights into barriers and facilitators for the implementation of organizational health literacy in schools. Future studies should focus on interventions that overcome identified barriers, targeting specific standards and indicators.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

德国学校组织健康素养:一项横断面研究结果。
卫生知识普及在儿童和青少年中普遍存在社会梯度,社会经济背景较低的儿童和青少年的卫生知识普及水平往往较低。针对整个环境的干预措施,如组织健康素养方法,似乎有望解决这些不平等问题。学校是实施此类干预措施的独特环境。直升机-学校项目旨在为学校制定组织卫生知识普及框架。该框架包含八项质量标准,每项标准由六项指标支撑,并被转化为自我评估工具(OHLS-Q)。本横断面研究首次采用德文版OHLS-Q量表评估德国学校组织健康素养的实施状况。学校管理人员通过在线调查完成问卷,包括社会人口统计、个人和学校信息。进行描述性统计。来自5个联邦州的598名参与者年龄为Ø, 52.3岁,主要为女性(73.6%)。49.1%在小学工作,37%在中学工作,13.9%在特殊教育学校工作。总体而言,受访者报告说,65.1%的框架标准和指标得到了(相当)高度的实施。各个标准和指标之间存在很大差异。已经参与学校健康促进计划或网络的学校在所有标准上的实施比例更高。缺乏资源(财政、时间和人员)。研究结果揭示了在学校实施组织健康素养的障碍和促进因素的重要见解。今后的研究应侧重于克服已确定障碍的干预措施,针对具体标准和指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Promotion International
Health Promotion International Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: Health Promotion International contains refereed original articles, reviews, and debate articles on major themes and innovations in the health promotion field. In line with the remits of the series of global conferences on health promotion the journal expressly invites contributions from sectors beyond health. These may include education, employment, government, the media, industry, environmental agencies, and community networks. As the thought journal of the international health promotion movement we seek in particular theoretical, methodological and activist advances to the field. Thus, the journal provides a unique focal point for articles of high quality that describe not only theories and concepts, research projects and policy formulation, but also planned and spontaneous activities, organizational change, as well as social and environmental development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信