The potential and limitations of large language models for automatic classification of teachers' motivational messages in educational research.

IF 3.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Olivia Metzner, Yindong Wang, Gerard de Melo, Wendy Symes, Yizhen Huang, Rebecca Lazarides
{"title":"The potential and limitations of large language models for automatic classification of teachers' motivational messages in educational research.","authors":"Olivia Metzner, Yindong Wang, Gerard de Melo, Wendy Symes, Yizhen Huang, Rebecca Lazarides","doi":"10.1111/bjep.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has created new opportunities in educational research, particularly in the efficient analysis of complex social interactions within classrooms. One promising area involves the classification of teachers' motivational messages. Traditionally, such assessments have relied on self-reports and observer evaluations, which require a lot of staff and time resources. Recently, large language models (LLMs) have been employed to classify teachers' motivational messages, offering novel, less labour-intensive approaches for classification.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>Building on these recent developments, this work presents a comprehensive literature overview exploring the applications, potential, and limitations of using LLMs to classify teachers' motivational messages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The present comprehensive literature overview indicates that the use of LLMs for classifying teachers' motivational messages is a promising yet still emerging field of research. Recent studies have applied LLMs in innovative ways, drawing on established motivational theories and employing novel classification techniques, such as zero-shot and few-shot prompting or fine-tuning, to classify motivational messages. Open questions remain, particularly concerning the structure, quantity, and quality of annotated material.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Whereas recent studies have demonstrated the potential of LLMs to offer scalable and time-efficient alternatives for classifying motivational messages in the classroom, several challenges persist. These include concerns related to the quality and quantity of training data, model generalisability, the ability to capture the complexity of classroom interactions, and biases involved in integrating LLMs as a classification method. This comprehensive literature overview provides practical recommendations for the responsible use of LLMs in educational research and school practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":51367,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Educational Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.70013","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has created new opportunities in educational research, particularly in the efficient analysis of complex social interactions within classrooms. One promising area involves the classification of teachers' motivational messages. Traditionally, such assessments have relied on self-reports and observer evaluations, which require a lot of staff and time resources. Recently, large language models (LLMs) have been employed to classify teachers' motivational messages, offering novel, less labour-intensive approaches for classification.

Aims: Building on these recent developments, this work presents a comprehensive literature overview exploring the applications, potential, and limitations of using LLMs to classify teachers' motivational messages.

Results: The present comprehensive literature overview indicates that the use of LLMs for classifying teachers' motivational messages is a promising yet still emerging field of research. Recent studies have applied LLMs in innovative ways, drawing on established motivational theories and employing novel classification techniques, such as zero-shot and few-shot prompting or fine-tuning, to classify motivational messages. Open questions remain, particularly concerning the structure, quantity, and quality of annotated material.

Discussion: Whereas recent studies have demonstrated the potential of LLMs to offer scalable and time-efficient alternatives for classifying motivational messages in the classroom, several challenges persist. These include concerns related to the quality and quantity of training data, model generalisability, the ability to capture the complexity of classroom interactions, and biases involved in integrating LLMs as a classification method. This comprehensive literature overview provides practical recommendations for the responsible use of LLMs in educational research and school practice.

大型语言模型在教师动机信息自动分类中的潜力与局限。
导读:人工智能(AI)的快速发展为教育研究创造了新的机会,特别是在有效分析课堂内复杂的社会互动方面。一个有前景的领域涉及教师激励信息的分类。传统上,这种评估依赖于自我报告和观察员评价,这需要大量的工作人员和时间资源。最近,大型语言模型(llm)被用于对教师的激励信息进行分类,提供了新颖的、劳动强度较低的分类方法。目的:在这些最新发展的基础上,这项工作提出了一个全面的文献综述,探讨了使用法学硕士对教师动机信息进行分类的应用、潜力和局限性。结果:目前的综合文献综述表明,使用法学硕士对教师动机信息进行分类是一个有前景但仍处于新兴的研究领域。最近的研究以创新的方式应用法学硕士,借鉴已建立的激励理论,并采用新的分类技术,如零射和少射提示或微调,对激励信息进行分类。悬而未决的问题仍然存在,特别是关于注释材料的结构、数量和质量。讨论:尽管最近的研究表明,法学硕士有潜力为课堂上的激励信息分类提供可扩展且节省时间的替代方案,但仍存在一些挑战。这些问题包括与培训数据的质量和数量、模型的通用性、捕捉课堂互动复杂性的能力以及将法学硕士整合为分类方法所涉及的偏见有关的问题。这一全面的文献综述提供了在教育研究和学校实践中负责任地使用法学硕士的实用建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.70%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Educational Psychology publishes original psychological research pertaining to education across all ages and educational levels including: - cognition - learning - motivation - literacy - numeracy and language - behaviour - social-emotional development - developmental difficulties linked to educational psychology or the psychology of education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信