Efficacy and safety of oral amantadine in Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia and motor fluctuations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of oral amantadine in Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia and motor fluctuations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.","authors":"Surachet Rujirussawarawong, Saharat Aungsumart, Chayut Kasemsuk, Natlada Limotai","doi":"10.1136/bmjno-2025-001115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oral amantadine is available in three formulations with distinct pharmacokinetics: immediate-release (IR), delayed-release/extended-release (DR/ER) and immediate-release/extended-release (IR/ER). While all formulations alleviate levodopa-induced dyskinesia, only DR/ER has shown efficacy for motor fluctuations. This meta-analysis evaluates the impact of amantadine formulations on motor complications in Parkinson's disease (PD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed and Scopus (inception to February 2024) identified randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating dyskinesia using various Dyskinesia Rating Scales (DRS) and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) or Movement Disorder Society (MDS)-UPDRS part 4 subscores ((MDS-)UPDRS IV), motor fluctuations using 'OFF' time and safety through adverse events. Subgroup analysis assessed formulation-specific effects. The I² statistic determined the use of fixed-effects or random-effects models for efficacy outcomes. Dyskinesia was analysed using standardised mean difference (SMD), motor fluctuations with mean difference (MD) and adverse events with ORs via a fixed-effects Mantel-Haenszel model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen RCTs (13 articles) were included. Amantadine significantly reduced dyskinesia (DRS: SMD=-1.32, 95% CI (-1.78 to -0.86); (MDS-)UPDRS IV: SMD=-0.95, 95% CI (-1.33 to -0.58)), with similar effects across formulations. 'OFF' time decreased significantly (MD=-0.66, 95% CI (-0.93 to -0.40)), notably with IR (MD=-0.75, 95% CI (-1.41 to -0.10)) and DR/ER (MD=-0.96, 95% CI (-1.35 to -0.57)), but not IR/ER (MD=-0.23, 95% CI (-0.68 to 0.22)). Adverse events (OR=3.30, 95% CI (2.29 to 4.74)) included dry mouth, hallucinations, peripheral oedema, dizziness and constipation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All amantadine formulations alleviated dyskinesia. Additionally, DR/ER improved motor fluctuations, while IR demonstrated benefits, although the evidence is limited by short study durations.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42024513081.</p>","PeriodicalId":52754,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Neurology Open","volume":"7 1","pages":"e001115"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12314832/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Neurology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjno-2025-001115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Oral amantadine is available in three formulations with distinct pharmacokinetics: immediate-release (IR), delayed-release/extended-release (DR/ER) and immediate-release/extended-release (IR/ER). While all formulations alleviate levodopa-induced dyskinesia, only DR/ER has shown efficacy for motor fluctuations. This meta-analysis evaluates the impact of amantadine formulations on motor complications in Parkinson's disease (PD).
Methods: A systematic search of PubMed and Scopus (inception to February 2024) identified randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating dyskinesia using various Dyskinesia Rating Scales (DRS) and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) or Movement Disorder Society (MDS)-UPDRS part 4 subscores ((MDS-)UPDRS IV), motor fluctuations using 'OFF' time and safety through adverse events. Subgroup analysis assessed formulation-specific effects. The I² statistic determined the use of fixed-effects or random-effects models for efficacy outcomes. Dyskinesia was analysed using standardised mean difference (SMD), motor fluctuations with mean difference (MD) and adverse events with ORs via a fixed-effects Mantel-Haenszel model.
Results: Fourteen RCTs (13 articles) were included. Amantadine significantly reduced dyskinesia (DRS: SMD=-1.32, 95% CI (-1.78 to -0.86); (MDS-)UPDRS IV: SMD=-0.95, 95% CI (-1.33 to -0.58)), with similar effects across formulations. 'OFF' time decreased significantly (MD=-0.66, 95% CI (-0.93 to -0.40)), notably with IR (MD=-0.75, 95% CI (-1.41 to -0.10)) and DR/ER (MD=-0.96, 95% CI (-1.35 to -0.57)), but not IR/ER (MD=-0.23, 95% CI (-0.68 to 0.22)). Adverse events (OR=3.30, 95% CI (2.29 to 4.74)) included dry mouth, hallucinations, peripheral oedema, dizziness and constipation.
Conclusions: All amantadine formulations alleviated dyskinesia. Additionally, DR/ER improved motor fluctuations, while IR demonstrated benefits, although the evidence is limited by short study durations.