Efficacy and safety of oral amantadine in Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia and motor fluctuations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

IF 2.4 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
BMJ Neurology Open Pub Date : 2025-06-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjno-2025-001115
Surachet Rujirussawarawong, Saharat Aungsumart, Chayut Kasemsuk, Natlada Limotai
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of oral amantadine in Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia and motor fluctuations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.","authors":"Surachet Rujirussawarawong, Saharat Aungsumart, Chayut Kasemsuk, Natlada Limotai","doi":"10.1136/bmjno-2025-001115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oral amantadine is available in three formulations with distinct pharmacokinetics: immediate-release (IR), delayed-release/extended-release (DR/ER) and immediate-release/extended-release (IR/ER). While all formulations alleviate levodopa-induced dyskinesia, only DR/ER has shown efficacy for motor fluctuations. This meta-analysis evaluates the impact of amantadine formulations on motor complications in Parkinson's disease (PD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed and Scopus (inception to February 2024) identified randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating dyskinesia using various Dyskinesia Rating Scales (DRS) and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) or Movement Disorder Society (MDS)-UPDRS part 4 subscores ((MDS-)UPDRS IV), motor fluctuations using 'OFF' time and safety through adverse events. Subgroup analysis assessed formulation-specific effects. The I² statistic determined the use of fixed-effects or random-effects models for efficacy outcomes. Dyskinesia was analysed using standardised mean difference (SMD), motor fluctuations with mean difference (MD) and adverse events with ORs via a fixed-effects Mantel-Haenszel model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen RCTs (13 articles) were included. Amantadine significantly reduced dyskinesia (DRS: SMD=-1.32, 95% CI (-1.78 to -0.86); (MDS-)UPDRS IV: SMD=-0.95, 95% CI (-1.33 to -0.58)), with similar effects across formulations. 'OFF' time decreased significantly (MD=-0.66, 95% CI (-0.93 to -0.40)), notably with IR (MD=-0.75, 95% CI (-1.41 to -0.10)) and DR/ER (MD=-0.96, 95% CI (-1.35 to -0.57)), but not IR/ER (MD=-0.23, 95% CI (-0.68 to 0.22)). Adverse events (OR=3.30, 95% CI (2.29 to 4.74)) included dry mouth, hallucinations, peripheral oedema, dizziness and constipation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All amantadine formulations alleviated dyskinesia. Additionally, DR/ER improved motor fluctuations, while IR demonstrated benefits, although the evidence is limited by short study durations.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42024513081.</p>","PeriodicalId":52754,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Neurology Open","volume":"7 1","pages":"e001115"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12314832/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Neurology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjno-2025-001115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Oral amantadine is available in three formulations with distinct pharmacokinetics: immediate-release (IR), delayed-release/extended-release (DR/ER) and immediate-release/extended-release (IR/ER). While all formulations alleviate levodopa-induced dyskinesia, only DR/ER has shown efficacy for motor fluctuations. This meta-analysis evaluates the impact of amantadine formulations on motor complications in Parkinson's disease (PD).

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed and Scopus (inception to February 2024) identified randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating dyskinesia using various Dyskinesia Rating Scales (DRS) and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) or Movement Disorder Society (MDS)-UPDRS part 4 subscores ((MDS-)UPDRS IV), motor fluctuations using 'OFF' time and safety through adverse events. Subgroup analysis assessed formulation-specific effects. The I² statistic determined the use of fixed-effects or random-effects models for efficacy outcomes. Dyskinesia was analysed using standardised mean difference (SMD), motor fluctuations with mean difference (MD) and adverse events with ORs via a fixed-effects Mantel-Haenszel model.

Results: Fourteen RCTs (13 articles) were included. Amantadine significantly reduced dyskinesia (DRS: SMD=-1.32, 95% CI (-1.78 to -0.86); (MDS-)UPDRS IV: SMD=-0.95, 95% CI (-1.33 to -0.58)), with similar effects across formulations. 'OFF' time decreased significantly (MD=-0.66, 95% CI (-0.93 to -0.40)), notably with IR (MD=-0.75, 95% CI (-1.41 to -0.10)) and DR/ER (MD=-0.96, 95% CI (-1.35 to -0.57)), but not IR/ER (MD=-0.23, 95% CI (-0.68 to 0.22)). Adverse events (OR=3.30, 95% CI (2.29 to 4.74)) included dry mouth, hallucinations, peripheral oedema, dizziness and constipation.

Conclusions: All amantadine formulations alleviated dyskinesia. Additionally, DR/ER improved motor fluctuations, while IR demonstrated benefits, although the evidence is limited by short study durations.

Prospero registration number: CRD42024513081.

口服金刚烷胺治疗帕金森病伴运动障碍和运动波动的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的系统综述和荟萃分析
背景:口服金刚烷胺有三种不同药代动力学的剂型:速释(IR)、缓释/缓释(DR/ER)和速释/缓释(IR/ER)。虽然所有配方都能减轻左旋多巴引起的运动障碍,但只有DR/ER对运动波动有效。本荟萃分析评估金刚烷胺制剂对帕金森病(PD)运动并发症的影响。方法:系统检索PubMed和Scopus(从开始到2024年2月),确定随机对照试验(rct)使用各种运动障碍评定量表(DRS)和统一帕金森病评定量表(UPDRS)或运动障碍学会(MDS)-UPDRS第4部分评分((MDS-)UPDRS IV)评估运动障碍,使用“关闭”时间的运动波动和通过不良事件的安全性。亚组分析评估了配方特异性效果。I²统计量决定了对疗效结果使用固定效应或随机效应模型。通过固定效应Mantel-Haenszel模型,使用标准化平均差(SMD)、运动波动平均差(MD)和ORs不良事件分析运动障碍。结果:纳入14篇rct(13篇)。金刚烷胺显著降低运动障碍(DRS: SMD=-1.32, 95% CI (-1.78 ~ -0.86);(MDS-)UPDRS IV: SMD=-0.95, 95% CI(-1.33至-0.58)),不同制剂的效果相似。“OFF”时间显著减少(MD=-0.66, 95% CI(-0.93至-0.40)),特别是IR (MD=-0.75, 95% CI(-1.41至-0.10))和DR/ER (MD=-0.96, 95% CI(-1.35至-0.57)),但IR/ER (MD=-0.23, 95% CI(-0.68至0.22))。不良事件(OR=3.30, 95% CI(2.29 ~ 4.74))包括口干、幻觉、外周水肿、头晕和便秘。结论:所有金刚烷胺制剂均能减轻运动障碍。此外,DR/ER改善了运动波动,而IR显示出益处,尽管证据受到研究持续时间短的限制。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42024513081。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Neurology Open
BMJ Neurology Open Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
46
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信