Polymethylmethacrylate augmentation of conventional pedicle screws in spine surgery - A modified classical method.

IF 1.3 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Juan Esteban Muñoz Montoya, Antonio José Gómez Díaz, José Leonardo Guerrero Cardozo, Ajoy Prasad Shetty
{"title":"Polymethylmethacrylate augmentation of conventional pedicle screws in spine surgery - A modified classical method.","authors":"Juan Esteban Muñoz Montoya, Antonio José Gómez Díaz, José Leonardo Guerrero Cardozo, Ajoy Prasad Shetty","doi":"10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_106_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pedicle screw augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) is a technique used to reduce the risk of pedicle screw pullout, loss of screw fixation, and implant failure in patients at high risk of mechanical complications.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to describe a modification of the classic augmentation technique of conventional pedicular screw instrumentation in spinal surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed on 47 patients over the age of 65 years who underwent spinal surgery using the proposed cement augmentation technique and were followed for 2 years. High-viscosity cement was injected into tapped vertebral pedicles, followed by the insertion of traditional pedicle screws. Patient selection was based on detailed preoperative clinical and imaging evaluations. Outcomes measured included the rate of complications, particularly cement leakage (CL), and the occurrence of neurological or vascular deficits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 47 patients were treated with 700 conventional screws. A total of 26/700 screws (3.71%) showed CL. According to the modified Yeom classification for CL, 9/700 (0.71%) were type S, 9/700 (0.71%) were type B, and 8/700 (0.57%) were type I; there were no neurological or vascular complications. There were no mechanical complications at 2 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This modified augmentation technique for conventional pedicle screws is an alternative for spinal instrumentation in elderly patients with a low incidence of clinically significant complications and also reduces procedure time by facilitating pedicle screw placement.</p>","PeriodicalId":51721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine","volume":"16 2","pages":"133-141"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12313037/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_106_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pedicle screw augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) is a technique used to reduce the risk of pedicle screw pullout, loss of screw fixation, and implant failure in patients at high risk of mechanical complications.

Study design: This was a retrospective observational study.

Objective: The objective of this study was to describe a modification of the classic augmentation technique of conventional pedicular screw instrumentation in spinal surgery.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 47 patients over the age of 65 years who underwent spinal surgery using the proposed cement augmentation technique and were followed for 2 years. High-viscosity cement was injected into tapped vertebral pedicles, followed by the insertion of traditional pedicle screws. Patient selection was based on detailed preoperative clinical and imaging evaluations. Outcomes measured included the rate of complications, particularly cement leakage (CL), and the occurrence of neurological or vascular deficits.

Results: A total of 47 patients were treated with 700 conventional screws. A total of 26/700 screws (3.71%) showed CL. According to the modified Yeom classification for CL, 9/700 (0.71%) were type S, 9/700 (0.71%) were type B, and 8/700 (0.57%) were type I; there were no neurological or vascular complications. There were no mechanical complications at 2 years.

Conclusions: This modified augmentation technique for conventional pedicle screws is an alternative for spinal instrumentation in elderly patients with a low incidence of clinically significant complications and also reduces procedure time by facilitating pedicle screw placement.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

脊柱外科常规椎弓根螺钉的聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯增强-一种改良的经典方法。
背景:聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)椎弓根螺钉增强术是一种用于降低机械并发症高风险患者椎弓根螺钉拔出、螺钉固定丢失和种植体失败风险的技术。研究设计:本研究为回顾性观察性研究。目的:本研究的目的是描述脊柱外科中传统椎弓根螺钉内固定的经典增强技术的改进。方法:回顾性分析47例65岁以上的脊柱手术患者,采用所建议的水泥增强技术,随访2年。将高粘度水泥注射到已攻丝的椎弓根内,然后置入传统椎弓根螺钉。患者的选择是基于详细的术前临床和影像学评估。测量的结果包括并发症的发生率,特别是水泥渗漏(CL),以及神经或血管缺损的发生率。结果:47例患者共使用700枚常规螺钉。700颗螺钉中有26颗(3.71%)出现CL。根据改进的Yeom分类,9/700(0.71%)为S型,9/700(0.71%)为B型,8/700(0.57%)为I型;没有神经或血管并发症。2年无机械并发症。结论:这种改良的椎弓根螺钉增强技术是老年患者脊柱内固定的一种替代方法,临床并发症发生率低,并且通过方便椎弓根螺钉置入减少了手术时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信