The who, how and what of educational outcome research for autistic students published in the last decade: A systematic quantitative literature review.

IF 3.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Raechel Smart, Dawn Adams, Kate Simpson
{"title":"The who, how and what of educational outcome research for autistic students published in the last decade: A systematic quantitative literature review.","authors":"Raechel Smart, Dawn Adams, Kate Simpson","doi":"10.1111/bjep.70015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Educational outcome research for autistic school students has expanded rapidly over the past decade, reporting variable results. This variability may be partially due to differences in participants and methods.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This review examines a decade of autism-focused quantitative research and identifies who and what educational outcome research has reported on and how outcomes were measured.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines, ERIC, Scopus, PsycINFO and PubMed were searched with predefined keywords and updated in October 2023. Utilizing systematic quantitative literature review methodology, 112 journal articles, theses and reports published 2012-2023, which quantitatively investigate academic, disciplinary or school attendance outcomes in autistic students were included. Risk of bias was evaluated using the STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology checklist. Descriptive statistics summarized the included research.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Included items reported on 226,314 participants. Most (76%) examined academic achievement, with few examining disciplinary or attendance outcomes. Research was largely conducted in North America. Reporting of co-occurring conditions and diverse gender presentations was limited. Ethnicity and socio-economic status were rarely reported. Reporting quality of academic outcome items was higher than that of disciplinary or attendance items.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings highlight gaps in reporting in literature on educational outcomes of autistic school students, limiting the practical utility of findings for educators and researchers. Future research is required on disciplinary and attendance outcomes. Comprehensive reporting of demographic data, including co-occurring conditions, gender beyond the binary and race and ethnicity are required to support intersectional analysis and improve the utility of findings for autistic and autism communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":51367,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Educational Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.70015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Educational outcome research for autistic school students has expanded rapidly over the past decade, reporting variable results. This variability may be partially due to differences in participants and methods.

Aims: This review examines a decade of autism-focused quantitative research and identifies who and what educational outcome research has reported on and how outcomes were measured.

Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, ERIC, Scopus, PsycINFO and PubMed were searched with predefined keywords and updated in October 2023. Utilizing systematic quantitative literature review methodology, 112 journal articles, theses and reports published 2012-2023, which quantitatively investigate academic, disciplinary or school attendance outcomes in autistic students were included. Risk of bias was evaluated using the STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology checklist. Descriptive statistics summarized the included research.

Results: Included items reported on 226,314 participants. Most (76%) examined academic achievement, with few examining disciplinary or attendance outcomes. Research was largely conducted in North America. Reporting of co-occurring conditions and diverse gender presentations was limited. Ethnicity and socio-economic status were rarely reported. Reporting quality of academic outcome items was higher than that of disciplinary or attendance items.

Conclusions: Findings highlight gaps in reporting in literature on educational outcomes of autistic school students, limiting the practical utility of findings for educators and researchers. Future research is required on disciplinary and attendance outcomes. Comprehensive reporting of demographic data, including co-occurring conditions, gender beyond the binary and race and ethnicity are required to support intersectional analysis and improve the utility of findings for autistic and autism communities.

近十年发表的自闭症学生教育成果研究的对象、方式和内容:系统的定量文献综述。
背景:对自闭症学生的教育成果研究在过去十年中迅速扩大,报告了不同的结果。这种可变性可能部分归因于参与者和方法的差异。目的:本综述检查了十年来以自闭症为重点的定量研究,并确定了谁和什么教育成果研究报告,以及如何衡量结果。方法:按照PRISMA指南,使用预定义关键词检索ERIC、Scopus、PsycINFO和PubMed,并于2023年10月更新。采用系统的定量文献综述方法,纳入了2012-2023年发表的112篇期刊文章、论文和报告,这些文章、论文和报告定量调查了自闭症学生的学业、学科或上学情况。偏倚风险评估采用加强流行病学观察性研究报告检查表。描述性统计对纳入的研究进行了总结。结果:包括226,314名参与者报告的项目。大多数(76%)审查学业成绩,很少审查纪律或出勤成绩。研究主要在北美进行。同时发生的疾病和不同性别表现的报告是有限的。很少报告种族和社会经济地位。学术成果项目的报告质量高于学科或出勤项目。结论:研究结果突出了自闭症学校学生教育成果的文献报道的差距,限制了研究结果对教育工作者和研究人员的实际效用。未来需要对纪律和出勤结果进行研究。需要全面报告人口统计数据,包括共同发生的疾病、非二元性别、种族和民族,以支持交叉分析,并提高自闭症和自闭症社区研究结果的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.70%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Educational Psychology publishes original psychological research pertaining to education across all ages and educational levels including: - cognition - learning - motivation - literacy - numeracy and language - behaviour - social-emotional development - developmental difficulties linked to educational psychology or the psychology of education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信