Is the Active Involvement of Family Caregivers in Adult Hospital Care Effective to Improve Patient Outcomes? A Systematic Review.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Daphne Bloemberg, Mark L van Zuylen, Selma C W Musters, Demi de Jong, Anne Marthe Schreuder, Faridi S Jamaludin, Benedikt Preckel, Els Nieveen van Dijkum, Anne M Eskes
{"title":"Is the Active Involvement of Family Caregivers in Adult Hospital Care Effective to Improve Patient Outcomes? A Systematic Review.","authors":"Daphne Bloemberg, Mark L van Zuylen, Selma C W Musters, Demi de Jong, Anne Marthe Schreuder, Faridi S Jamaludin, Benedikt Preckel, Els Nieveen van Dijkum, Anne M Eskes","doi":"10.1111/jocn.70059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the effects of active involvement of family caregivers in adult in-hospital care on patients' readmissions, complications, mortality, length of hospital stay, quality of life, psychological distress and activities of daily living, as well as on the satisfaction of patients, HCPs and family caregivers.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, EBSCO CINAHL, Cochrane Library (from inception to February 2024).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PRISMA 2020 statement was followed. Prospective controlled studies focusing on active involvement of family caregivers in adult in-hospital care were included. Two independent teams of authors conducted study selection, quality assessment and data extraction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies were included, comprising 11 randomised controlled trials. The clinical and methodological heterogeneity precluded a meta-analysis. Six of these studies were performed in stroke patients. Some studies reported statistically significant benefits of active family involvement on readmission rates, hospital LOS, ADL, psychological distress for patients and family members, QoL and satisfaction of family caregivers. However, others did not observe differences in these outcomes. For complication rates, mortality and satisfaction of patients and HCPs, no studies demonstrated significant differences between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Further research is needed to provide a conclusive answer as to whether active family caregiver involvement improves outcomes of adult hospitalised patients.</p><p><strong>Implications for patient care: </strong>Despite the inconclusive findings of this review, advocating for active involvement of family caregivers in adult in-hospital care fits the perspective of patient- and family-centred care.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>As the care of hospitalised adults is shifting to a more family-centric approach, investigating the effects of an active role of family caregivers in adult in-hospital care is necessary. However, the small number of studies available and heterogeneity between studies included in this review hamper firm conclusions. Further evaluations through well-designed studies are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.70059","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To investigate the effects of active involvement of family caregivers in adult in-hospital care on patients' readmissions, complications, mortality, length of hospital stay, quality of life, psychological distress and activities of daily living, as well as on the satisfaction of patients, HCPs and family caregivers.

Design: Systematic review.

Data sources: Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, EBSCO CINAHL, Cochrane Library (from inception to February 2024).

Methods: The PRISMA 2020 statement was followed. Prospective controlled studies focusing on active involvement of family caregivers in adult in-hospital care were included. Two independent teams of authors conducted study selection, quality assessment and data extraction.

Results: Thirteen studies were included, comprising 11 randomised controlled trials. The clinical and methodological heterogeneity precluded a meta-analysis. Six of these studies were performed in stroke patients. Some studies reported statistically significant benefits of active family involvement on readmission rates, hospital LOS, ADL, psychological distress for patients and family members, QoL and satisfaction of family caregivers. However, others did not observe differences in these outcomes. For complication rates, mortality and satisfaction of patients and HCPs, no studies demonstrated significant differences between groups.

Conclusion: Further research is needed to provide a conclusive answer as to whether active family caregiver involvement improves outcomes of adult hospitalised patients.

Implications for patient care: Despite the inconclusive findings of this review, advocating for active involvement of family caregivers in adult in-hospital care fits the perspective of patient- and family-centred care.

Impact: As the care of hospitalised adults is shifting to a more family-centric approach, investigating the effects of an active role of family caregivers in adult in-hospital care is necessary. However, the small number of studies available and heterogeneity between studies included in this review hamper firm conclusions. Further evaluations through well-designed studies are required.

家庭照顾者积极参与成人医院护理是否能有效改善患者预后?系统评价。
目的:探讨家庭照顾者积极参与成人住院护理对患者再入院、并发症、死亡率、住院时间、生活质量、心理困扰和日常生活活动的影响,以及对患者、医护人员和家庭照顾者满意度的影响。设计:系统回顾。数据来源:Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, EBSCO CINAHL, Cochrane Library(从成立到2024年2月)。方法:遵循PRISMA 2020声明。纳入前瞻性对照研究,重点关注家庭照顾者在成人住院护理中的积极参与。两个独立的作者团队进行了研究选择、质量评估和数据提取。结果:纳入13项研究,包括11项随机对照试验。临床和方法学的异质性排除了meta分析。其中6项研究是在中风患者中进行的。一些研究报告了积极的家庭参与在再入院率、医院LOS、ADL、患者和家庭成员的心理困扰、生活质量和家庭照顾者满意度方面的统计学显著益处。然而,其他人没有观察到这些结果的差异。对于并发症发生率、死亡率以及患者和医护人员的满意度,没有研究表明两组之间存在显著差异。结论:积极的家庭照顾者参与是否能改善成年住院患者的预后,需要进一步的研究来提供结论性的答案。对病人护理的启示:尽管本综述的发现不具有结论性,但提倡家庭照顾者积极参与成人住院护理符合以病人和家庭为中心的护理观点。影响:由于住院成年人的护理正在转向更加以家庭为中心的方法,调查家庭照顾者在成人住院护理中的积极作用的影响是必要的。然而,可获得的研究数量少,且纳入本综述的研究之间存在异质性,妨碍了得出确切的结论。需要通过精心设计的研究进行进一步评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice. JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice. We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信