Formal Coercion and the Moral Division of Labor: Moving Beyond Role Conflicts in Psychiatric Nursing

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Pierre Pariseau-Legault, Guillaume Ouellet, Emmanuelle Bernheim, Marie-Hélène Goulet, Jean-Daniel Jacob, Lisandre Labrecque-Lebeau, Dave Holmes
{"title":"Formal Coercion and the Moral Division of Labor: Moving Beyond Role Conflicts in Psychiatric Nursing","authors":"Pierre Pariseau-Legault,&nbsp;Guillaume Ouellet,&nbsp;Emmanuelle Bernheim,&nbsp;Marie-Hélène Goulet,&nbsp;Jean-Daniel Jacob,&nbsp;Lisandre Labrecque-Lebeau,&nbsp;Dave Holmes","doi":"10.1111/jpm.70016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Psychiatric nurses are actively involved in involuntary hospitalisations and treatments. However, the scientific literature lacks insights into strategies used to navigate roles and institutional expectations in this regard.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To achieve a deeper understanding of practices that support the exercise of individual rights in psychiatry during involuntary hospitalisations and treatments.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>A situational analysis was conducted. Nineteen (<i>n</i> = 19) mental health workers participated in a semi-structured interview and completed a socio-demographic questionnaire. Case law review (<i>n</i> = 126) and non-participant observations (<i>n</i> = 70 h) were also conducted.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The moral division of labour is a central element in mental health interventions, organising four types of practices: socio-legal assistance, support for exercising rights, intersectoral coordination and ignorance and trivialisation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Our findings reveal that nursing care is predominantly medicalised, confining nurses to a subordinate role. They also indicate marginal practices focused on socio-legal assistance and human rights support. Intersectoral coordination, though crucial, remains an invisible aspect of nursing practice.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications for Practice</h3>\n \n <p>There remains a significant lack of awareness about human rights issues in psychiatry. This research underscores the importance of considering professional hierarchies, organisational expectations and legal awareness to address role conflicts in psychiatric care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Relevance Statement</h3>\n \n <p>This research highlights the need to study nurses' agency, offering insights into how they interpret and apply psychiatric laws. Such research could deepen knowledge on human rights issues in psychiatry or, at minimum, promote greater recognition of these concerns. Social policy implications are also notable, underscoring the need for integrated socio-legal assistance during involuntary treatments to support patients navigating complex systems and exercising their rights. Finally, the findings point to the importance of examining professional hierarchies, organisational expectations and legal awareness in developing practices that address the emotional, educational and intersectoral aspects of psychiatric coercion.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing","volume":"32 5","pages":"1232-1243"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jpm.70016","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpm.70016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Psychiatric nurses are actively involved in involuntary hospitalisations and treatments. However, the scientific literature lacks insights into strategies used to navigate roles and institutional expectations in this regard.

Aim

To achieve a deeper understanding of practices that support the exercise of individual rights in psychiatry during involuntary hospitalisations and treatments.

Method

A situational analysis was conducted. Nineteen (n = 19) mental health workers participated in a semi-structured interview and completed a socio-demographic questionnaire. Case law review (n = 126) and non-participant observations (n = 70 h) were also conducted.

Results

The moral division of labour is a central element in mental health interventions, organising four types of practices: socio-legal assistance, support for exercising rights, intersectoral coordination and ignorance and trivialisation.

Discussion

Our findings reveal that nursing care is predominantly medicalised, confining nurses to a subordinate role. They also indicate marginal practices focused on socio-legal assistance and human rights support. Intersectoral coordination, though crucial, remains an invisible aspect of nursing practice.

Implications for Practice

There remains a significant lack of awareness about human rights issues in psychiatry. This research underscores the importance of considering professional hierarchies, organisational expectations and legal awareness to address role conflicts in psychiatric care.

Relevance Statement

This research highlights the need to study nurses' agency, offering insights into how they interpret and apply psychiatric laws. Such research could deepen knowledge on human rights issues in psychiatry or, at minimum, promote greater recognition of these concerns. Social policy implications are also notable, underscoring the need for integrated socio-legal assistance during involuntary treatments to support patients navigating complex systems and exercising their rights. Finally, the findings point to the importance of examining professional hierarchies, organisational expectations and legal awareness in developing practices that address the emotional, educational and intersectoral aspects of psychiatric coercion.

形式强制与道德分工:超越精神科护理中的角色冲突。
精神科护士积极参与非自愿住院和治疗。然而,科学文献缺乏对在这方面用于导航角色和机构期望的策略的见解。目的:更深入地了解在非自愿住院和治疗期间支持在精神病学中行使个人权利的做法。方法:进行情景分析。19名(n = 19)精神卫生工作者参加了半结构化访谈,并完成了社会人口调查问卷。还进行了案例法回顾(n = 126)和非参与者观察(n = 70 h)。结果:道德分工是心理健康干预的核心要素,它组织了四种做法:社会法律援助、支持行使权利、部门间协调以及忽视和轻视。讨论:我们的研究结果表明,护理主要是医疗化的,限制护士的从属角色。它们还表明了侧重于社会法律援助和人权支助的边缘做法。部门间协调虽然至关重要,但仍然是护理实践的一个无形方面。对实践的影响:在精神病学中,对人权问题的认识仍然严重缺乏。这项研究强调了考虑专业等级、组织期望和法律意识的重要性,以解决精神科护理中的角色冲突。相关性声明:本研究强调了研究护士机构的必要性,为他们如何解释和应用精神病学法律提供了见解。这种研究可以加深对精神病学中人权问题的认识,或至少促进对这些问题的更多认识。社会政策影响也值得注意,强调在非自愿治疗期间需要综合社会法律援助,以支持患者在复杂的系统中导航并行使其权利。最后,研究结果指出,在制定解决精神强迫的情感、教育和跨部门方面的实践时,检查专业等级、组织期望和法律意识的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
75
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing is an international journal which publishes research and scholarly papers that advance the development of policy, practice, research and education in all aspects of mental health nursing. We publish rigorously conducted research, literature reviews, essays and debates, and consumer practitioner narratives; all of which add new knowledge and advance practice globally. All papers must have clear implications for mental health nursing either solely or part of multidisciplinary practice. Papers are welcomed which draw on single or multiple research and academic disciplines. We give space to practitioner and consumer perspectives and ensure research published in the journal can be understood by a wide audience. We encourage critical debate and exchange of ideas and therefore welcome letters to the editor and essays and debates in mental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信