Ebola Stigma and Its Impact on Outbreak Control: Lessons From Key Informant Interviews in Central Uganda.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Tropical Medicine & International Health Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-03 DOI:10.1111/tmi.70014
Amy Paterson, Olive Kabajaasi, Francess Adlard, Kkunsa Hadson Dimitrios, Ashleigh Cheyne, Yasin Ssewankambo, David Kaggwa, Piero Olliaro, Nathan Kenya-Mugisha, Amanda Rojek
{"title":"Ebola Stigma and Its Impact on Outbreak Control: Lessons From Key Informant Interviews in Central Uganda.","authors":"Amy Paterson, Olive Kabajaasi, Francess Adlard, Kkunsa Hadson Dimitrios, Ashleigh Cheyne, Yasin Ssewankambo, David Kaggwa, Piero Olliaro, Nathan Kenya-Mugisha, Amanda Rojek","doi":"10.1111/tmi.70014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The 2022 outbreak of Sudan ebolavirus in central Uganda was the country's largest in two decades. It was accompanied by reports of stigma towards affected individuals, households and communities. The objectives of this study were to (1) describe how Ebola disease stigma emerged and manifested during the 2022 Sudan ebolavirus outbreak in central Uganda, (2) examine its impacts, including on outbreak control and (3) identify insights that could inform stigma reduction strategies in future outbreaks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted qualitative in-depth interviews with 12 key informants involved in the Ebola disease outbreak response using Microsoft Teams. Participants included frontline healthcare workers, burial team members, psychosocial support staff, survivor programme staff, village health team members, local outbreak response leadership and Ebola survivors. Transcribed interviews were coded in NVivo Release 1.7.2 and analysed using framework analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Contextual drivers of stigma included mistrust of authorities, limited knowledge about the disease and conspicuous survivor follow-up. These drivers fuelled negative thoughts and emotions, predominantly blame and fear. Interviewees described how stigma manifested as negative attitudes, verbal and physical harm, unwarranted avoidance and structural disadvantage, which persisted beyond the outbreak itself. Stigma was seen to impact outbreak control by discouraging symptom reporting, delaying care-seeking and exacerbating workforce shortages in clinical centres. Factors that mitigated stigma included psychosocial support and survivor advocacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ebola-related stigma complicates outbreak control and has adverse psychosocial effects that linger long after the outbreak is declared over. We provide a range of multilevel strategies for reducing stigma, including engagement with trusted community leaders, survivor-centred support systems and provision of psychological support for responders.</p>","PeriodicalId":23962,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Medicine & International Health","volume":" ","pages":"1006-1017"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12401622/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Medicine & International Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.70014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The 2022 outbreak of Sudan ebolavirus in central Uganda was the country's largest in two decades. It was accompanied by reports of stigma towards affected individuals, households and communities. The objectives of this study were to (1) describe how Ebola disease stigma emerged and manifested during the 2022 Sudan ebolavirus outbreak in central Uganda, (2) examine its impacts, including on outbreak control and (3) identify insights that could inform stigma reduction strategies in future outbreaks.

Methods: We conducted qualitative in-depth interviews with 12 key informants involved in the Ebola disease outbreak response using Microsoft Teams. Participants included frontline healthcare workers, burial team members, psychosocial support staff, survivor programme staff, village health team members, local outbreak response leadership and Ebola survivors. Transcribed interviews were coded in NVivo Release 1.7.2 and analysed using framework analysis.

Results: Contextual drivers of stigma included mistrust of authorities, limited knowledge about the disease and conspicuous survivor follow-up. These drivers fuelled negative thoughts and emotions, predominantly blame and fear. Interviewees described how stigma manifested as negative attitudes, verbal and physical harm, unwarranted avoidance and structural disadvantage, which persisted beyond the outbreak itself. Stigma was seen to impact outbreak control by discouraging symptom reporting, delaying care-seeking and exacerbating workforce shortages in clinical centres. Factors that mitigated stigma included psychosocial support and survivor advocacy.

Conclusions: Ebola-related stigma complicates outbreak control and has adverse psychosocial effects that linger long after the outbreak is declared over. We provide a range of multilevel strategies for reducing stigma, including engagement with trusted community leaders, survivor-centred support systems and provision of psychological support for responders.

Abstract Image

埃博拉污名及其对疫情控制的影响:来自乌干达中部关键信息者访谈的教训。
目标:2022年在乌干达中部爆发的苏丹埃博拉病毒是该国二十年来最大的一次。与此同时,有报道称,受影响的个人、家庭和社区受到了羞辱。本研究的目的是:(1)描述2022年乌干达中部苏丹埃博拉病毒爆发期间埃博拉病耻辱感是如何出现和表现的,(2)检查其影响,包括对疫情控制的影响,以及(3)确定可以为未来疫情减少耻辱感策略提供信息的见解。方法:采用Microsoft Teams对参与埃博拉疫情应对的12名关键线人进行定性深度访谈。与会者包括一线卫生保健工作者、埋葬小组成员、社会心理支持工作人员、幸存者方案工作人员、村卫生小组成员、当地疫情应对领导和埃博拉幸存者。访谈记录在NVivo 1.7.2版本中编码,并使用框架分析进行分析。结果:污名的背景驱动因素包括对当局的不信任,对疾病的了解有限和明显的幸存者随访。这些驱动因素助长了消极的想法和情绪,主要是责备和恐惧。受访者描述了耻辱如何表现为消极态度、言语和身体伤害、毫无根据的回避和结构性劣势,这些问题在疫情爆发之后仍然存在。人们认为,耻辱感会阻碍症状报告、拖延求医时间并加剧临床中心的劳动力短缺,从而影响疫情控制。减轻耻辱的因素包括社会心理支持和幸存者宣传。结论:与埃博拉相关的污名使疫情控制复杂化,并具有在疫情宣布结束后仍长期存在的不良心理社会影响。我们提供了一系列多层次的策略来减少耻辱感,包括与可信赖的社区领袖接触,以幸存者为中心的支持系统以及为响应者提供心理支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tropical Medicine & International Health
Tropical Medicine & International Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
129
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Tropical Medicine & International Health is published on behalf of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Foundation Tropical Medicine and International Health, Belgian Institute of Tropical Medicine and Bernhard-Nocht-Institute for Tropical Medicine. Tropical Medicine & International Health is the official journal of the Federation of European Societies for Tropical Medicine and International Health (FESTMIH).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信