Relationship Between Virtual Pharmacology Lecture, Attendance and Performance: Personal Experience With Veterinary Students of the University of BUEA, Southwest Cameroon.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Saganuwan Alhaji Saganuwan, Manchang Tanyi Kingsley
{"title":"Relationship Between Virtual Pharmacology Lecture, Attendance and Performance: Personal Experience With Veterinary Students of the University of BUEA, Southwest Cameroon.","authors":"Saganuwan Alhaji Saganuwan, Manchang Tanyi Kingsley","doi":"10.1002/prp2.70118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Risk and cost of transportation and other unforeseen circumstances can hamper in-person pharmacology lectures with students. Hence, the study is aimed at identifying the advantages and disadvantages of pharmacology lectures via Zoom. A crossover design was adopted for the study that involved a total of 151 students of veterinary medicine, which comprised students of 400 level (52), 500 level (52) and 600 level (47) who participated six times in the study for one semester. All the lectures were delivered online. The levels and average numbers of online lecture participants were 400 level (22.3), 500 level (22.8) and 600 level (21.3) for Principles of Pharmacology, Applied Pharmacology, and Therapeutics, respectively. The findings showed no significant difference in online connection (p > 0.05) between 400, 500, and 600 level students. The numbers of students that passed Principles of Pharmacology (15), Applied Pharmacology (13) and Therapeutics (14) showed that the level of study and performance on the tests were connected with lecture attendance. Fourty-four percent attended the lectures, whereas 56% were absent. However, 27.8% of all the students passed the tests, whereas 72.2% failed the tests, respectively. The highest number of feedbacks (p < 0.05) was received from 500 level students (32), as compared to 400 level students (24) and 600 level students (17), respectively. The study has shown that online pharmacology lectures can serve as an alternative to in-person lectures, though associated with technical problems. However, many students showed much enthusiasm and praised the lecturer for his frantic effort in delivering the lectures, cordial lecturer/student relationship, and his objectivity toward class. The failure of power supply, problems of coordinating courses, zoom meeting network issues, insufficient laptops and phones, as well as the problem of connection with the course lecturer for the online lectures are disadvantages. Online lecturer/student relationship, objectivity of the lecturer, and lecturing methods can boost students' morale and interest in online lectures.</p>","PeriodicalId":19948,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacology Research & Perspectives","volume":"13 4","pages":"e70118"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12318827/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacology Research & Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/prp2.70118","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Risk and cost of transportation and other unforeseen circumstances can hamper in-person pharmacology lectures with students. Hence, the study is aimed at identifying the advantages and disadvantages of pharmacology lectures via Zoom. A crossover design was adopted for the study that involved a total of 151 students of veterinary medicine, which comprised students of 400 level (52), 500 level (52) and 600 level (47) who participated six times in the study for one semester. All the lectures were delivered online. The levels and average numbers of online lecture participants were 400 level (22.3), 500 level (22.8) and 600 level (21.3) for Principles of Pharmacology, Applied Pharmacology, and Therapeutics, respectively. The findings showed no significant difference in online connection (p > 0.05) between 400, 500, and 600 level students. The numbers of students that passed Principles of Pharmacology (15), Applied Pharmacology (13) and Therapeutics (14) showed that the level of study and performance on the tests were connected with lecture attendance. Fourty-four percent attended the lectures, whereas 56% were absent. However, 27.8% of all the students passed the tests, whereas 72.2% failed the tests, respectively. The highest number of feedbacks (p < 0.05) was received from 500 level students (32), as compared to 400 level students (24) and 600 level students (17), respectively. The study has shown that online pharmacology lectures can serve as an alternative to in-person lectures, though associated with technical problems. However, many students showed much enthusiasm and praised the lecturer for his frantic effort in delivering the lectures, cordial lecturer/student relationship, and his objectivity toward class. The failure of power supply, problems of coordinating courses, zoom meeting network issues, insufficient laptops and phones, as well as the problem of connection with the course lecturer for the online lectures are disadvantages. Online lecturer/student relationship, objectivity of the lecturer, and lecturing methods can boost students' morale and interest in online lectures.

虚拟药理学讲座、出勤率与成绩的关系——以喀麦隆西南BUEA大学兽医专业学生为例
运输的风险和成本以及其他不可预见的情况可能会阻碍学生亲自进行药理学讲座。因此,本研究旨在通过Zoom识别药理学讲座的优点和缺点。本研究采用交叉设计,共涉及151名兽医学专业学生,其中400级(52名)、500级(52名)和600级(47名)的学生在一个学期内参与了6次研究。所有的讲座都在网上进行。《药理学原理》、《应用药理学》和《治疗学》的在线授课人数分别为400人(22.3人)、500人(22.8人)和600人(21.3人)。结果显示,400级、500级和600级学生的在线连接没有显著差异(p > 0.05)。通过药理学原理(15人)、应用药理学(13人)和治疗学(14人)的学生人数表明,学习水平和考试成绩与上课出勤率有关。44%的人参加了讲座,56%的人缺席。然而,27.8%的学生通过了考试,而72.2%的学生不及格。反馈的最高数量(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
Pharmacology Research & Perspectives Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
120
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: PR&P is jointly published by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (ASPET), the British Pharmacological Society (BPS), and Wiley. PR&P is a bi-monthly open access journal that publishes a range of article types, including: target validation (preclinical papers that show a hypothesis is incorrect or papers on drugs that have failed in early clinical development); drug discovery reviews (strategy, hypotheses, and data resulting in a successful therapeutic drug); frontiers in translational medicine (drug and target validation for an unmet therapeutic need); pharmacological hypotheses (reviews that are oriented to inform a novel hypothesis); and replication studies (work that refutes key findings [failed replication] and work that validates key findings). PR&P publishes papers submitted directly to the journal and those referred from the journals of ASPET and the BPS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信