The Role of Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Meta-Analysis.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Emergency Medicine International Pub Date : 2025-07-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/emmi/5591055
Xi Chen, Zexi Zou, Xueyi Wen, Linfei Li, Yuanyuan Liang
{"title":"The Role of Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Xi Chen, Zexi Zou, Xueyi Wen, Linfei Li, Yuanyuan Liang","doi":"10.1155/emmi/5591055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This meta-analysis systematically evaluated the impact of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) on the survival of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and related factors. <b>Methods:</b> A computerized search of China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), PubMed, and Embase was conducted from the database's inception to May 1, 2023. The study included observational studies of patients who experienced OHCA and were successfully resuscitated using BCPR, following the predetermined criteria for inclusion and exclusion. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale, with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) used as effect size measures. The data were statistically analyzed using Review Manager 5.4 software. <b>Results:</b> Fourteen observational studies were included in this study, involving 253,247 cases of OHCA. The primary outcome measure was survival to discharge or survival at 30 days. A meta-analysis was conducted to analyze the data from these 14 studies. The findings indicated that the no-BCPR group had a significantly reduced survival rate compared to the BCPR group (OR: 1.72, 95% CI: 1.40-2.12, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Secondly, the study examined 14 studies that focused on prehospital return of spontaneous circulation and neurological recovery before they reached the hospital. The findings revealed that patients who received BCPR had a higher rate of prehospital ROSC (OR: 2.06, 95% CI: 1.66-2.57, <i>p</i> < 0.05) and experienced better neurological recovery (OR: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.67-2.47, <i>p</i> < 0.05) compared to those who did not receive BCPR. This difference was found to be statistically significant. <b>Conclusion:</b> BCPR can potentially enhance the likelihood of survival for patients experiencing OHCA. BCPR can offer patients an opportunity for both survival and favorable neurological recovery during the time when emergency medical services (EMS) respond. Given the existing circumstances, it is advisable to enhance the promotion and training of public CPR and improve the prevalence of bystander CPR in society since this is expected to yield substantial social advantages.</p>","PeriodicalId":11528,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine International","volume":"2025 ","pages":"5591055"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12317805/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/emmi/5591055","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This meta-analysis systematically evaluated the impact of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) on the survival of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and related factors. Methods: A computerized search of China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), PubMed, and Embase was conducted from the database's inception to May 1, 2023. The study included observational studies of patients who experienced OHCA and were successfully resuscitated using BCPR, following the predetermined criteria for inclusion and exclusion. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale, with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) used as effect size measures. The data were statistically analyzed using Review Manager 5.4 software. Results: Fourteen observational studies were included in this study, involving 253,247 cases of OHCA. The primary outcome measure was survival to discharge or survival at 30 days. A meta-analysis was conducted to analyze the data from these 14 studies. The findings indicated that the no-BCPR group had a significantly reduced survival rate compared to the BCPR group (OR: 1.72, 95% CI: 1.40-2.12, p < 0.05). Secondly, the study examined 14 studies that focused on prehospital return of spontaneous circulation and neurological recovery before they reached the hospital. The findings revealed that patients who received BCPR had a higher rate of prehospital ROSC (OR: 2.06, 95% CI: 1.66-2.57, p < 0.05) and experienced better neurological recovery (OR: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.67-2.47, p < 0.05) compared to those who did not receive BCPR. This difference was found to be statistically significant. Conclusion: BCPR can potentially enhance the likelihood of survival for patients experiencing OHCA. BCPR can offer patients an opportunity for both survival and favorable neurological recovery during the time when emergency medical services (EMS) respond. Given the existing circumstances, it is advisable to enhance the promotion and training of public CPR and improve the prevalence of bystander CPR in society since this is expected to yield substantial social advantages.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

旁观者心肺复苏的作用:一项荟萃分析。
目的:本荟萃分析系统评价旁观者心肺复苏(BCPR)对院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者生存的影响及相关因素。方法:计算机检索中国知网(CNKI)、万方数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、PubMed和Embase数据库,检索时间为数据库建立至2023年5月1日。该研究包括观察性研究,这些患者经历了OHCA并使用BCPR成功复苏,遵循预定的纳入和排除标准。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估纳入研究的质量,使用优势比(ORs)和95%置信区间(95% ci)作为效应量测量。使用Review Manager 5.4软件对数据进行统计分析。结果:本研究纳入14项观察性研究,共纳入253247例OHCA病例。主要结局指标是存活至出院或存活30天。对这14项研究的数据进行荟萃分析。结果显示,与BCPR组相比,无BCPR组生存率显著降低(OR: 1.72, 95% CI: 1.40 ~ 2.12, p < 0.05)。其次,该研究检查了14项研究,这些研究的重点是院前自发循环的恢复和到达医院之前的神经恢复。结果显示,与未接受BCPR的患者相比,接受BCPR的患者院前ROSC率更高(OR: 2.06, 95% CI: 1.66 ~ 2.57, p < 0.05),神经功能恢复更好(OR: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.67 ~ 2.47, p < 0.05)。这种差异在统计学上是显著的。结论:BCPR可以潜在地提高OHCA患者的生存率。在紧急医疗服务(EMS)响应期间,BCPR可以为患者提供生存和良好神经恢复的机会。在现有情况下,应加强公众心肺复苏术的推广和培训,提高社会中旁观者心肺复苏术的普及率,以期产生实质性的社会效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine International
Emergency Medicine International EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
187
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Emergency Medicine International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for doctors, nurses, paramedics and ambulance staff. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to prehospital care, disaster preparedness and response, acute medical and paediatric emergencies, critical care, sports medicine, wound care, and toxicology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信