Impact of mesenchymal stem cell therapy on cardiac function and outcomes in acute myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis of clinical studies.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q3 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING
Cell Transplantation Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-04 DOI:10.1177/09636897251359773
Mei Zhao, Yanpeng Xue, Qingqing Tian, Yan Deng, Tao Tang
{"title":"Impact of mesenchymal stem cell therapy on cardiac function and outcomes in acute myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis of clinical studies.","authors":"Mei Zhao, Yanpeng Xue, Qingqing Tian, Yan Deng, Tao Tang","doi":"10.1177/09636897251359773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) treatment on cardiovascular function and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) at various follow-up intervals. Clinical studies comparing MSC therapy with control treatments for AMI were identified from databases including Cochrane, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, CNKI, and Wanfang, covering publications up to August 2024. Data analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.4 software. MSC treatment significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) compared to controls at follow-up intervals <6 months (MD = 3.42; <i>P</i> < 0.0001), 6 months (MD = 4.15; <i>P</i> = 0.006), and 12 months (MD = 2.77; <i>P</i> = 0.006). However, no significant effect on LVEF was observed after 12 months (MD = 3.50; <i>P</i> = 0.17). MSC therapy did not significantly affect left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) at any interval. Left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) significantly decreased only within the first 6 months (MD = -11.35; <i>P</i> = 0.11) but not at subsequent follow-ups. Wall motion score index (WMSI) significantly improved at <6 months (MD = -0.06; <i>P</i> < 0.0001), 6 months (MD = -0.04; <i>P</i> = 0.006), and >12 months (MD = -0.03; <i>P</i> = 0.02). However, the improvement at 12 months was borderline significant (MD = -0.06; <i>P</i> = 0.06). MSC therapy showed no significant reduction in MACE (odds ratio [OR] = 1.61; <i>P</i> = 0.10). Subgroup analyses indicated intracoronary MSC administration notably improved LVEF (MD = 4.27; <i>P</i> < 0.0001), while intravenous MSC administration showed no significant effect. Neither administration route significantly affected MACE outcomes. No publication bias was detected. In conclusion, MSC therapy significantly enhances LVEF and WMSI within the first 12 months post-AMI, with intracoronary administration showing greater efficacy than intravenous delivery. However, MSC treatment did not significantly reduce MACE incidence. Further rigorous clinical trials are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":9721,"journal":{"name":"Cell Transplantation","volume":"34 ","pages":"9636897251359773"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12322349/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09636897251359773","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) treatment on cardiovascular function and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) at various follow-up intervals. Clinical studies comparing MSC therapy with control treatments for AMI were identified from databases including Cochrane, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, CNKI, and Wanfang, covering publications up to August 2024. Data analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.4 software. MSC treatment significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) compared to controls at follow-up intervals <6 months (MD = 3.42; P < 0.0001), 6 months (MD = 4.15; P = 0.006), and 12 months (MD = 2.77; P = 0.006). However, no significant effect on LVEF was observed after 12 months (MD = 3.50; P = 0.17). MSC therapy did not significantly affect left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) at any interval. Left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) significantly decreased only within the first 6 months (MD = -11.35; P = 0.11) but not at subsequent follow-ups. Wall motion score index (WMSI) significantly improved at <6 months (MD = -0.06; P < 0.0001), 6 months (MD = -0.04; P = 0.006), and >12 months (MD = -0.03; P = 0.02). However, the improvement at 12 months was borderline significant (MD = -0.06; P = 0.06). MSC therapy showed no significant reduction in MACE (odds ratio [OR] = 1.61; P = 0.10). Subgroup analyses indicated intracoronary MSC administration notably improved LVEF (MD = 4.27; P < 0.0001), while intravenous MSC administration showed no significant effect. Neither administration route significantly affected MACE outcomes. No publication bias was detected. In conclusion, MSC therapy significantly enhances LVEF and WMSI within the first 12 months post-AMI, with intracoronary administration showing greater efficacy than intravenous delivery. However, MSC treatment did not significantly reduce MACE incidence. Further rigorous clinical trials are needed to confirm these findings.

间充质干细胞治疗对急性心肌梗死心功能和预后的影响:临床研究的荟萃分析
本荟萃分析评估了间充质干细胞(MSC)治疗在不同随访期间对急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者心血管功能和主要不良心脏事件(MACE)的影响。从Cochrane、Web of Science、PubMed、Embase、CNKI和万方等数据库中确定了比较MSC治疗与对照治疗治疗AMI的临床研究,涵盖截至2024年8月的出版物。使用Review Manager 5.4软件进行数据分析。与对照组相比,MSC治疗显著改善左室射血分数(LVEF)(随访时间P < 0.0001), 6个月(MD = 4.15;P = 0.006), 12个月时(MD = 2.77;P = 0.006)。然而,12个月后LVEF未见显著影响(MD = 3.50;P = 0.17)。MSC治疗对左室舒张末期容积(LVEDV)无显著影响。左室收缩末期容积(LVESV)仅在前6个月内显著降低(MD = -11.35;P = 0.11),但在随后的随访中没有。壁运动评分指数(WMSI)显著改善(P < 0.0001), 6个月(MD = -0.04;P = 0.006), 12个月(MD = -0.03;P = 0.02)。然而,12个月时的改善是临界显著的(MD = -0.06;P = 0.06)。骨髓间质干细胞治疗没有显著降低MACE(优势比[OR] = 1.61;P = 0.10)。亚组分析显示冠状动脉内注射MSC可显著改善LVEF (MD = 4.27;P < 0.0001),而静脉注射MSC无显著影响。两种给药途径均未显著影响MACE结果。未发现发表偏倚。总之,在ami后的前12个月内,MSC治疗显著提高LVEF和WMSI,冠状动脉内给药比静脉给药更有效。然而,骨髓干细胞治疗并没有显著降低MACE的发生率。需要进一步严格的临床试验来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cell Transplantation
Cell Transplantation 生物-细胞与组织工程
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.00%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Cell Transplantation, The Regenerative Medicine Journal is an open access, peer reviewed journal that is published 12 times annually. Cell Transplantation is a multi-disciplinary forum for publication of articles on cell transplantation and its applications to human diseases. Articles focus on a myriad of topics including the physiological, medical, pre-clinical, tissue engineering, stem cell, and device-oriented aspects of the nervous, endocrine, cardiovascular, and endothelial systems, as well as genetically engineered cells. Cell Transplantation also reports on relevant technological advances, clinical studies, and regulatory considerations related to the implantation of cells into the body in order to provide complete coverage of the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信