Intersecting perspectives: A participatory street review framework for urban inclusivity

IF 7 1区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Rashid Mushkani , Shin Koseki
{"title":"Intersecting perspectives: A participatory street review framework for urban inclusivity","authors":"Rashid Mushkani ,&nbsp;Shin Koseki","doi":"10.1016/j.habitatint.2025.103536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban demographic changes, evolving multiculturalism, and heightened tourism flows have underscored the importance of designing public streets that serve heterogeneous populations. Despite municipal policies advocating equity and universal access, many streetscapes still fall short of accommodating the wide-ranging practical and cultural differences that exist among diverse user groups. This paper introduces and applies a participatory methodology—“Street Review”—designed to capture how individuals from varying social positions evaluate an array of streets within a multicultural metropolis. Grounded in the context of Montréal, known for its overlapping layers of historic and modern neighborhoods, multilingual communities, and continual inflows of short-term visitors, this framework draws upon qualitative interviews, focus groups, and a systematic rating of street images by 12 participants. The analyses focus on perceived inclusivity, accessibility, aesthetics, and practicality for both long-term residents (post-occupancy) and newcomers or suburban visitors (pre-occupancy). Findings from examining 20 selected streets (represented through 60 vantage points) indicate that most streetscapes offer moderate levels of user-friendliness, with only a handful of locations scoring especially low on supporting vulnerable populations or signaling cultural welcome. A smaller subset approached higher performance in certain areas but rarely satisfied all participant groups. In situating these results within global debates around inclusive urban design, public space, and the interplay of tourism with social equity, we illustrate how group-based deliberations can generate constructive insights and spotlight deeper conflicts rooted in identity, memory, and everyday mobility. These reflections inform planners and policymakers in striving for streets that address the convergence of diverse user experiences and emerging global challenges in urban policy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48376,"journal":{"name":"Habitat International","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 103536"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Habitat International","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197397525002528","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urban demographic changes, evolving multiculturalism, and heightened tourism flows have underscored the importance of designing public streets that serve heterogeneous populations. Despite municipal policies advocating equity and universal access, many streetscapes still fall short of accommodating the wide-ranging practical and cultural differences that exist among diverse user groups. This paper introduces and applies a participatory methodology—“Street Review”—designed to capture how individuals from varying social positions evaluate an array of streets within a multicultural metropolis. Grounded in the context of Montréal, known for its overlapping layers of historic and modern neighborhoods, multilingual communities, and continual inflows of short-term visitors, this framework draws upon qualitative interviews, focus groups, and a systematic rating of street images by 12 participants. The analyses focus on perceived inclusivity, accessibility, aesthetics, and practicality for both long-term residents (post-occupancy) and newcomers or suburban visitors (pre-occupancy). Findings from examining 20 selected streets (represented through 60 vantage points) indicate that most streetscapes offer moderate levels of user-friendliness, with only a handful of locations scoring especially low on supporting vulnerable populations or signaling cultural welcome. A smaller subset approached higher performance in certain areas but rarely satisfied all participant groups. In situating these results within global debates around inclusive urban design, public space, and the interplay of tourism with social equity, we illustrate how group-based deliberations can generate constructive insights and spotlight deeper conflicts rooted in identity, memory, and everyday mobility. These reflections inform planners and policymakers in striving for streets that address the convergence of diverse user experiences and emerging global challenges in urban policy.
交叉视角:城市包容性的参与式街道审查框架
城市人口结构的变化、多元文化的发展以及旅游流量的增加都强调了设计服务于异质人群的公共街道的重要性。尽管市政政策提倡公平和普遍使用,但许多街景仍然无法适应不同用户群体之间存在的广泛的实际和文化差异。本文介绍并应用了一种参与式方法——“街道评论”——旨在捕捉来自不同社会地位的个人如何评估多元文化大都市中的一系列街道。montracimal以其历史和现代社区、多语言社区和不断涌入的短期游客的重叠层而闻名,该框架基于12名参与者的定性访谈、焦点小组和对街道图像的系统评级。分析的重点是对长期居民(入住后)和新来者或郊区游客(入住前)的感知包容性、可达性、美学和实用性。对20条选定街道(通过60个有利位置代表)的调查结果表明,大多数街景提供了中等水平的用户友好性,只有少数几个地点在支持弱势群体或表达文化欢迎方面得分特别低。一小部分人在某些领域取得了更高的表现,但很少能让所有的参与者群体满意。通过将这些结果置于围绕包容性城市设计、公共空间以及旅游业与社会公平的相互作用的全球辩论中,我们说明了以群体为基础的审议如何产生建设性的见解,并突显出植根于身份、记忆和日常流动性的更深层次的冲突。这些反思为规划者和政策制定者提供了信息,帮助他们努力设计能够解决不同用户体验融合和城市政策中新出现的全球挑战的街道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
10.30%
发文量
151
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Habitat International is dedicated to the study of urban and rural human settlements: their planning, design, production and management. Its main focus is on urbanisation in its broadest sense in the developing world. However, increasingly the interrelationships and linkages between cities and towns in the developing and developed worlds are becoming apparent and solutions to the problems that result are urgently required. The economic, social, technological and political systems of the world are intertwined and changes in one region almost always affect other regions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信