{"title":"A novel multi-stage multi-scenario multi-objective optimisation framework for adaptive robust decision-making under deep uncertainty","authors":"Babooshka Shavazipour , Theodor J. Stewart","doi":"10.1016/j.omega.2025.103405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Many real-world decision-making problems involve multiple decision-making stages and various objectives. Besides, most decisions need to be made before having complete knowledge about all aspects of the problem, leaving some sort of uncertainty. Deep uncertainty happens when the degree of uncertainty is so high that the probability distributions are not confidently knowable. In this situation, using wrong probability distributions leads to failure. Scenarios, instead, should be used to evaluate the consequences of any decisions in different plausible futures and find a robust solution. In this study, we proposed a novel multi-stage multi-scenario multi-objective optimisation framework for adaptive/dynamic robust decision-making under deep uncertainty using a more flexible definition of robustness by incorporating the risk attitude of the decision-makers. In this definition, a robust decision is one that performs relatively well (acceptable) in a broad range of scenarios. Two approaches, named multi-stage multi-scenario multi-objective and two-stage moving horizon, have been proposed and compared. Finally, the proposed approaches are applied in a case study of sequential portfolio selection under deep uncertainty, and the robustness of their solutions is discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19529,"journal":{"name":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","volume":"138 ","pages":"Article 103405"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048325001318","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Many real-world decision-making problems involve multiple decision-making stages and various objectives. Besides, most decisions need to be made before having complete knowledge about all aspects of the problem, leaving some sort of uncertainty. Deep uncertainty happens when the degree of uncertainty is so high that the probability distributions are not confidently knowable. In this situation, using wrong probability distributions leads to failure. Scenarios, instead, should be used to evaluate the consequences of any decisions in different plausible futures and find a robust solution. In this study, we proposed a novel multi-stage multi-scenario multi-objective optimisation framework for adaptive/dynamic robust decision-making under deep uncertainty using a more flexible definition of robustness by incorporating the risk attitude of the decision-makers. In this definition, a robust decision is one that performs relatively well (acceptable) in a broad range of scenarios. Two approaches, named multi-stage multi-scenario multi-objective and two-stage moving horizon, have been proposed and compared. Finally, the proposed approaches are applied in a case study of sequential portfolio selection under deep uncertainty, and the robustness of their solutions is discussed.
期刊介绍:
Omega reports on developments in management, including the latest research results and applications. Original contributions and review articles describe the state of the art in specific fields or functions of management, while there are shorter critical assessments of particular management techniques. Other features of the journal are the "Memoranda" section for short communications and "Feedback", a correspondence column. Omega is both stimulating reading and an important source for practising managers, specialists in management services, operational research workers and management scientists, management consultants, academics, students and research personnel throughout the world. The material published is of high quality and relevance, written in a manner which makes it accessible to all of this wide-ranging readership. Preference will be given to papers with implications to the practice of management. Submissions of purely theoretical papers are discouraged. The review of material for publication in the journal reflects this aim.