{"title":"Investigation of core endurance, performance and functional activities in crossfit participants","authors":"Songül Bağlan Yentür , Muhammet Şahin Elbastı , Nesih Kanan , İrem Sıla Boyrazli","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.07.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Crossfit is a high-intensity and high-comprehensive continuously changing strength and conditioning program that has risk of injury. Core muscles are important for the protective mechanism of the spine and extremities. The aim of this study was to investigate core endurance, performance and functional activities in Crossfit participants.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study included 20 crossfit participants, 20 fitness participants who had been participating in sports for at least 6 months and 20 physically inactive individuals. The McGill Tordo Endurance Test Battery was used to assess core endurance, the Functional Movement Screen test was used to assess function, and the 30-m sprint test, 3-min step test, vertical jump test, and one leg forward jump test were used to assess performance. Physical activity level was evaluated with International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Significant differences were observed between the groups in age, occupational status, and smoking status (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed between the groups in height, weight, body mass index, gender and dominant extremity (p > 0.05). In addition, there were significant differences between the three groups in physical activity level, core endurance and performance tests (p < 0.05). In functional movement screen evaluation, no significant difference was obtained in deep squatting and shoulder mobility (p > 0.05), while significant differences were obtained among other parameters (p < 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Crossfit participants were found better core endurance, performance, function and physical activity levels than fitness participants and sedentary individuals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"45 ","pages":"Pages 8-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859225002955","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
Crossfit is a high-intensity and high-comprehensive continuously changing strength and conditioning program that has risk of injury. Core muscles are important for the protective mechanism of the spine and extremities. The aim of this study was to investigate core endurance, performance and functional activities in Crossfit participants.
Methods
The study included 20 crossfit participants, 20 fitness participants who had been participating in sports for at least 6 months and 20 physically inactive individuals. The McGill Tordo Endurance Test Battery was used to assess core endurance, the Functional Movement Screen test was used to assess function, and the 30-m sprint test, 3-min step test, vertical jump test, and one leg forward jump test were used to assess performance. Physical activity level was evaluated with International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ).
Results
Significant differences were observed between the groups in age, occupational status, and smoking status (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed between the groups in height, weight, body mass index, gender and dominant extremity (p > 0.05). In addition, there were significant differences between the three groups in physical activity level, core endurance and performance tests (p < 0.05). In functional movement screen evaluation, no significant difference was obtained in deep squatting and shoulder mobility (p > 0.05), while significant differences were obtained among other parameters (p < 0.05).
Conclusion
Crossfit participants were found better core endurance, performance, function and physical activity levels than fitness participants and sedentary individuals.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina