Z. Xu , H. Zeng , J. Teng , X. Ding , J. Li , Z. Zhang
{"title":"Integrating eQTL and genome-wide association studies to uncover additive and dominant regulatory circuits in pig uterine capacity","authors":"Z. Xu , H. Zeng , J. Teng , X. Ding , J. Li , Z. Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.animal.2025.101599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Uterine capacity is critical to the economic value of pigs. Exploring the genetic mechanisms that underlie uterine capacity can provide vital insights for pig breeding programmes. Here, we used a mixed model including additive and dominance effects to conduct genome-wide association analysis followed by cross-population meta-analyses for uterine capacity in 8 782 pigs from three pig breeds across nine populations. We identified 192 lead single−nucleotide polymorphisms (<strong>SNPs</strong>) with additive-specific effects, 236 lead SNPs with dominant-specific effects, and 27 lead SNPs with additive-dominant shared effects. The effects of additive-specific and dominant-specific lead SNPs were shared across breeds to a certain degree. By integrating expression quantitative trait loci, we identified 40 potential dominant-effect and 10 potential additive-effect regulatory circuits, in which a genetic variant affects uterine capacity by modulating the expression of specific gene in specific tissue. For example, rs343882381 affects uterine capacity by regulating the expression of <em>SLC38A10</em> in the uterus via a dominant effect (<em>P</em><sub>SMR</sub> = 7.34 × 10<sup>−5</sup>, COLOC.PP4 > 0.5), rs337112076 affects uterine capacity by regulating the expression of <em>TNNT1</em> in the brain via an additive effect (<em>P</em><sub>SMR</sub> = 2.36 × 10<sup>−35</sup>, COLOC.PP4 > 0.5). Our results not only fill the knowledge gap regarding dominant genetic regulation mechanisms of uterine capacity but also provide a key theoretical foundation for the subsequent functional validation and breeding applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50789,"journal":{"name":"Animal","volume":"19 8","pages":"Article 101599"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175173112500182X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Uterine capacity is critical to the economic value of pigs. Exploring the genetic mechanisms that underlie uterine capacity can provide vital insights for pig breeding programmes. Here, we used a mixed model including additive and dominance effects to conduct genome-wide association analysis followed by cross-population meta-analyses for uterine capacity in 8 782 pigs from three pig breeds across nine populations. We identified 192 lead single−nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with additive-specific effects, 236 lead SNPs with dominant-specific effects, and 27 lead SNPs with additive-dominant shared effects. The effects of additive-specific and dominant-specific lead SNPs were shared across breeds to a certain degree. By integrating expression quantitative trait loci, we identified 40 potential dominant-effect and 10 potential additive-effect regulatory circuits, in which a genetic variant affects uterine capacity by modulating the expression of specific gene in specific tissue. For example, rs343882381 affects uterine capacity by regulating the expression of SLC38A10 in the uterus via a dominant effect (PSMR = 7.34 × 10−5, COLOC.PP4 > 0.5), rs337112076 affects uterine capacity by regulating the expression of TNNT1 in the brain via an additive effect (PSMR = 2.36 × 10−35, COLOC.PP4 > 0.5). Our results not only fill the knowledge gap regarding dominant genetic regulation mechanisms of uterine capacity but also provide a key theoretical foundation for the subsequent functional validation and breeding applications.
期刊介绍:
Editorial board
animal attracts the best research in animal biology and animal systems from across the spectrum of the agricultural, biomedical, and environmental sciences. It is the central element in an exciting collaboration between the British Society of Animal Science (BSAS), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA) and the European Federation of Animal Science (EAAP) and represents a merging of three scientific journals: Animal Science; Animal Research; Reproduction, Nutrition, Development. animal publishes original cutting-edge research, ''hot'' topics and horizon-scanning reviews on animal-related aspects of the life sciences at the molecular, cellular, organ, whole animal and production system levels. The main subject areas include: breeding and genetics; nutrition; physiology and functional biology of systems; behaviour, health and welfare; farming systems, environmental impact and climate change; product quality, human health and well-being. Animal models and papers dealing with the integration of research between these topics and their impact on the environment and people are particularly welcome.