Impact of Education for Paramedic-Performed Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Cardiac Function Evaluation: A Pilot Study Assessing Imaging Quality and Interpretation

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Jaelle L. Thorne , Taylor LaRese MD , Katie Rong MD , Catriana R. Thorne , Lindsay Adelson MD , Ryan Antonowicz , Thomas Latosek MD , Regina Kostyun PhD , Meghan Kelly Herbst MD
{"title":"Impact of Education for Paramedic-Performed Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Cardiac Function Evaluation: A Pilot Study Assessing Imaging Quality and Interpretation","authors":"Jaelle L. Thorne ,&nbsp;Taylor LaRese MD ,&nbsp;Katie Rong MD ,&nbsp;Catriana R. Thorne ,&nbsp;Lindsay Adelson MD ,&nbsp;Ryan Antonowicz ,&nbsp;Thomas Latosek MD ,&nbsp;Regina Kostyun PhD ,&nbsp;Meghan Kelly Herbst MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jemermed.2025.07.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cardiac point-of-care ultrasound (cPoCUS) can detect occlusive myocardial infarction (OMI) in the absence of diagnostic electrocardiogram (ECG) by assessment of left ventricle (LV) function. The feasibility of cPoCUS to assess LV function in the prehospital setting is unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Study Objective</h3><div>To determine image adequacy and interpretation accuracy of paramedics performing cPoCUS for assessment of LV function and wall motion abnormality (WMA).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a prospective observation pilot study of ultrasound-naïve paramedics who participated in a clinical education program to identify OMI and performed cPoCUS during transport of adult patients. Primary outcomes were proportion of patients with 12-lead ECG who received cPoCUS, quality of images obtained, and paramedic interpretations (overall LV function and presence of a WMA). Sensitivity and specificity for LV function and WMA were calculated along with Cohen’s kappa (κ) comparing paramedic interpretation to ultrasound fellowship-trained emergency physicians.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of paramedics who passed a clinical evaluation (<em>n</em> = 14) and written test (<em>n</em> = 10), six opted to participate. Of the 201 eligible cases, 88.6% received cPoCUS during their transport to the hospital. Adequate views for LV function and WMA were obtained among 61.2% and 38.8% of patients, respectively. Accurate paramedic interpretations for LV function and WMA were made among 83/94 (88.3%) and 54/56 (96.4%) patients, respectively. There was moderate agreement between paramedics and physicians on LV function (κ = 0.41), with 41.7% sensitivity and 95.1% specificity. No patients presented with WMA.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>With brief training, paramedics were able to acquire adequate cPoCUS images for LV function assessment, and interpretations were largely accurate.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"76 ","pages":"Pages 33-40"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736467925002677","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Cardiac point-of-care ultrasound (cPoCUS) can detect occlusive myocardial infarction (OMI) in the absence of diagnostic electrocardiogram (ECG) by assessment of left ventricle (LV) function. The feasibility of cPoCUS to assess LV function in the prehospital setting is unknown.

Study Objective

To determine image adequacy and interpretation accuracy of paramedics performing cPoCUS for assessment of LV function and wall motion abnormality (WMA).

Methods

This was a prospective observation pilot study of ultrasound-naïve paramedics who participated in a clinical education program to identify OMI and performed cPoCUS during transport of adult patients. Primary outcomes were proportion of patients with 12-lead ECG who received cPoCUS, quality of images obtained, and paramedic interpretations (overall LV function and presence of a WMA). Sensitivity and specificity for LV function and WMA were calculated along with Cohen’s kappa (κ) comparing paramedic interpretation to ultrasound fellowship-trained emergency physicians.

Results

Of paramedics who passed a clinical evaluation (n = 14) and written test (n = 10), six opted to participate. Of the 201 eligible cases, 88.6% received cPoCUS during their transport to the hospital. Adequate views for LV function and WMA were obtained among 61.2% and 38.8% of patients, respectively. Accurate paramedic interpretations for LV function and WMA were made among 83/94 (88.3%) and 54/56 (96.4%) patients, respectively. There was moderate agreement between paramedics and physicians on LV function (κ = 0.41), with 41.7% sensitivity and 95.1% specificity. No patients presented with WMA.

Conclusion

With brief training, paramedics were able to acquire adequate cPoCUS images for LV function assessment, and interpretations were largely accurate.
教育对护理人员进行的心功能超声评估的影响:一项评估成像质量和解释的初步研究
背景心脏即时超声(cPoCUS)可以在没有诊断性心电图(ECG)的情况下通过评估左心室(LV)功能来检测闭塞性心肌梗死(OMI)。ccpocus在院前评估左室功能的可行性尚不清楚。研究目的确定医护人员在进行cPoCUS评估左室功能和壁运动异常(WMA)时图像的充分性和解释准确性。方法:这是一项前瞻性观察先导研究,研究对象为ultrasound-naïve医护人员,他们参加了一个临床教育项目,以识别OMI并在成人患者运输过程中实施cPoCUS。主要结局是接受cPoCUS的12导联心电图患者比例、获得的图像质量和医护人员解释(整体左室功能和WMA的存在)。计算左室功能和WMA的敏感性和特异性,以及比较护理人员解释和超声研究员培训的急诊医生的科恩κ (κ)。结果通过临床评估(n = 14)和笔试(n = 10)的护理人员中,有6人选择参加。在201例符合条件的病例中,88.6%的患者在转运至医院期间接受了cPoCUS。61.2%和38.8%的患者分别获得了足够的左室功能和WMA视图。在83/94例(88.3%)和54/56例(96.4%)患者中,医务人员对左室功能和WMA做出了准确的解释。医护人员和内科医生对左室功能有中度一致(κ = 0.41),敏感性为41.7%,特异性为95.1%。无患者出现WMA。结论经过简短的培训,医护人员能够获得足够的cPoCUS图像用于左室功能评估,且判读准确度较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Emergency Medicine
Journal of Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
339
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed publication featuring original contributions of interest to both the academic and practicing emergency physician. JEM, published monthly, contains research papers and clinical studies as well as articles focusing on the training of emergency physicians and on the practice of emergency medicine. The Journal features the following sections: • Original Contributions • Clinical Communications: Pediatric, Adult, OB/GYN • Selected Topics: Toxicology, Prehospital Care, The Difficult Airway, Aeromedical Emergencies, Disaster Medicine, Cardiology Commentary, Emergency Radiology, Critical Care, Sports Medicine, Wound Care • Techniques and Procedures • Technical Tips • Clinical Laboratory in Emergency Medicine • Pharmacology in Emergency Medicine • Case Presentations of the Harvard Emergency Medicine Residency • Visual Diagnosis in Emergency Medicine • Medical Classics • Emergency Forum • Editorial(s) • Letters to the Editor • Education • Administration of Emergency Medicine • International Emergency Medicine • Computers in Emergency Medicine • Violence: Recognition, Management, and Prevention • Ethics • Humanities and Medicine • American Academy of Emergency Medicine • AAEM Medical Student Forum • Book and Other Media Reviews • Calendar of Events • Abstracts • Trauma Reports • Ultrasound in Emergency Medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信