Transport-related health, safety and accessibility in sub-Saharan Africa: Comparative insights from Kumasi-Ghana and Dar es Salaam-Tanzania

Gift Dumedah , Patrick Azong , Emmanuel Kofi Adanu , Precious Adwoa Okyere , Steven Jones
{"title":"Transport-related health, safety and accessibility in sub-Saharan Africa: Comparative insights from Kumasi-Ghana and Dar es Salaam-Tanzania","authors":"Gift Dumedah ,&nbsp;Patrick Azong ,&nbsp;Emmanuel Kofi Adanu ,&nbsp;Precious Adwoa Okyere ,&nbsp;Steven Jones","doi":"10.1016/j.aftran.2025.100058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban mobility is crucial in shaping safety perceptions, health outcomes, and accessibility experiences. However, disparities in urban mobility patterns, particularly regarding safety, health, and accessibility, require further exploration to inform equitable and sustainable solutions in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Accordingly, this study provides a comparative analysis of transport-related safety in Kumasi-Ghana, and Dar es Salaam (DAR), Tanzania, focusing on community safety perceptions, health impacts, and mobility choices. Using the Perceived Accessibility Scale and a semi-structured data collection framework, the study explores key transport-related safety indicators, including infrastructure quality, inclusivity, and health-related mobility considerations. The study findings are based on data collected from 600 respondents in Kumasi-Ghana, and 1189 in DAR-Tanzania. The findings reveal that Kumasi-Ghana exhibits relatively stronger safety perceptions, whereas DAR-Tanzania faces heightened accessibility challenges, particularly for vulnerable populations such as the elderly, children, and persons with disabilities. Statistical relationships reveal distinct urban mobility patterns, with travel cost emerging as a dominant factor in DAR-Tanzania's travel decisions, while safety concerns are more influential in Kumasi-Ghana. Additionally, DAR-Tanzania experiences higher travel-related stress, reinforcing the need for efficiency-oriented interventions such as congestion management and improved public transport reliability. Policy implications underscore the need for targeted infrastructure investments, inclusive transport design, and affordability measures. Both cities require enhancements in pedestrian and cycling infrastructure, with DAR-Tanzania demonstrating a greater need for interventions benefiting vulnerable populations. Integrating health-conscious mobility strategies, such as air quality improvements and active transport promotion, can foster sustainability benefits. Through these findings, policymakers can enhance mobility and well-being through equitable and sustainable transport solutions that address urban safety, economic constraints, and health-related challenges.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100058,"journal":{"name":"African Transport Studies","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100058"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Transport Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950196225000365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urban mobility is crucial in shaping safety perceptions, health outcomes, and accessibility experiences. However, disparities in urban mobility patterns, particularly regarding safety, health, and accessibility, require further exploration to inform equitable and sustainable solutions in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Accordingly, this study provides a comparative analysis of transport-related safety in Kumasi-Ghana, and Dar es Salaam (DAR), Tanzania, focusing on community safety perceptions, health impacts, and mobility choices. Using the Perceived Accessibility Scale and a semi-structured data collection framework, the study explores key transport-related safety indicators, including infrastructure quality, inclusivity, and health-related mobility considerations. The study findings are based on data collected from 600 respondents in Kumasi-Ghana, and 1189 in DAR-Tanzania. The findings reveal that Kumasi-Ghana exhibits relatively stronger safety perceptions, whereas DAR-Tanzania faces heightened accessibility challenges, particularly for vulnerable populations such as the elderly, children, and persons with disabilities. Statistical relationships reveal distinct urban mobility patterns, with travel cost emerging as a dominant factor in DAR-Tanzania's travel decisions, while safety concerns are more influential in Kumasi-Ghana. Additionally, DAR-Tanzania experiences higher travel-related stress, reinforcing the need for efficiency-oriented interventions such as congestion management and improved public transport reliability. Policy implications underscore the need for targeted infrastructure investments, inclusive transport design, and affordability measures. Both cities require enhancements in pedestrian and cycling infrastructure, with DAR-Tanzania demonstrating a greater need for interventions benefiting vulnerable populations. Integrating health-conscious mobility strategies, such as air quality improvements and active transport promotion, can foster sustainability benefits. Through these findings, policymakers can enhance mobility and well-being through equitable and sustainable transport solutions that address urban safety, economic constraints, and health-related challenges.
撒哈拉以南非洲与交通有关的健康、安全和可达性:来自加纳库马西和坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆的比较见解
城市交通对于形成安全观念、健康结果和无障碍体验至关重要。然而,城市流动模式的差异,特别是在安全、健康和可达性方面的差异,需要进一步探索,以便为撒哈拉以南非洲的公平和可持续解决办法提供信息。因此,本研究对加纳库马西和坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆(Dar)的交通安全进行了比较分析,重点关注社区安全观念、健康影响和出行选择。利用可达性感知量表和半结构化数据收集框架,该研究探讨了与交通相关的关键安全指标,包括基础设施质量、包容性和与健康相关的流动性考虑因素。研究结果基于从库马西-加纳的600名受访者和坦桑尼亚的1189名受访者收集的数据。研究结果显示,库马西-加纳表现出相对较强的安全意识,而坦桑尼亚达尔地区面临着更大的无障碍挑战,特别是对老年人、儿童和残疾人等弱势群体。统计关系揭示了截然不同的城市交通模式,旅行成本成为dar -坦桑尼亚旅行决策的主要因素,而安全问题在库马西-加纳更有影响力。此外,坦桑尼亚达尔富尔地区面临着更大的旅行压力,因此需要采取以效率为导向的干预措施,如拥堵管理和提高公共交通的可靠性。政策影响强调了有针对性的基础设施投资、包容性交通设计和可负担性措施的必要性。这两个城市都需要加强行人和自行车基础设施,坦桑尼亚发展计划署表明更需要采取有利于弱势群体的干预措施。整合注重健康的交通战略,如改善空气质量和促进主动交通,可以促进可持续性效益。通过这些发现,政策制定者可以通过解决城市安全、经济制约和健康相关挑战的公平和可持续的交通解决方案来增强流动性和福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信