Real-world use of upadacitinib in refractory giant cell arteritis: a case report.

IF 0.9 Q4 RHEUMATOLOGY
Lisa Wang, Christopher Davidson, Brian Wu, Akihiro Nakamura
{"title":"Real-world use of upadacitinib in refractory giant cell arteritis: a case report.","authors":"Lisa Wang, Christopher Davidson, Brian Wu, Akihiro Nakamura","doi":"10.1093/mrcr/rxaf050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is an autoimmune disease that predominantly affects individuals over 50 years of age by causing inflammation typically in the temporal and cranial arteries. While glucocorticoids like prednisone are the first-line treatment for GCA, glucocorticoid monotherapy is often inadequate for preventing disease flares and is associated with significant side effects when long-term use is required, necessitating the exploration of alternative therapies. Tocilizumab (TCZ) has proven effective as a steroid-sparing agent; however, some patients may respond inadequately or develop adverse events. Treatment with the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor upadacitinib (UPA) has recently emerged as a potential alternative therapy for refractory GCA, and its phase III clinical trials successfully demonstrated its efficacy for GCA patients, with or without prior treatment with TCZ. It has also been recently approved by both the European Commission and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for GCA. However, real-world data on the efficacy of UPA in GCA remain scarce. This case report describes an 82-year-old woman with GCA refractory to both prednisone and TCZ, who reported severe side effects and decreased quality of life from the latter medication. Treatment with UPA resulted in substantial improvements in symptoms, including headaches and fatigue, with minimal negative responses. This outcome demonstrates the potential of UPA as a promising treatment option for GCA patients who are unresponsive or intolerant to current standard therapies. Further real-world studies are warranted to validate UPA's long-term safety and efficacy in treating GCA.</p>","PeriodicalId":94146,"journal":{"name":"Modern rheumatology case reports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern rheumatology case reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mrcr/rxaf050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is an autoimmune disease that predominantly affects individuals over 50 years of age by causing inflammation typically in the temporal and cranial arteries. While glucocorticoids like prednisone are the first-line treatment for GCA, glucocorticoid monotherapy is often inadequate for preventing disease flares and is associated with significant side effects when long-term use is required, necessitating the exploration of alternative therapies. Tocilizumab (TCZ) has proven effective as a steroid-sparing agent; however, some patients may respond inadequately or develop adverse events. Treatment with the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor upadacitinib (UPA) has recently emerged as a potential alternative therapy for refractory GCA, and its phase III clinical trials successfully demonstrated its efficacy for GCA patients, with or without prior treatment with TCZ. It has also been recently approved by both the European Commission and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for GCA. However, real-world data on the efficacy of UPA in GCA remain scarce. This case report describes an 82-year-old woman with GCA refractory to both prednisone and TCZ, who reported severe side effects and decreased quality of life from the latter medication. Treatment with UPA resulted in substantial improvements in symptoms, including headaches and fatigue, with minimal negative responses. This outcome demonstrates the potential of UPA as a promising treatment option for GCA patients who are unresponsive or intolerant to current standard therapies. Further real-world studies are warranted to validate UPA's long-term safety and efficacy in treating GCA.

Upadacitinib在难治性巨细胞动脉炎中的实际应用:1例报告。
巨细胞动脉炎(GCA)是一种自身免疫性疾病,主要影响50岁以上的个体,通常在颞动脉和颅动脉引起炎症。虽然像强的松这样的糖皮质激素是GCA的一线治疗方法,但糖皮质激素单药治疗往往不足以预防疾病发作,并且在需要长期使用时伴有明显的副作用,因此有必要探索替代疗法。Tocilizumab (TCZ)已被证明是一种有效的类固醇节约剂;然而,一些患者可能反应不足或出现不良事件。Janus激酶(JAK)抑制剂Upadacitinib (UPA)最近成为难治性GCA的潜在替代疗法,其III期临床试验成功地证明了其对GCA患者的疗效,无论是否事先接受过TCZ治疗。它最近也被欧盟委员会和美国食品和药物管理局批准用于GCA。然而,关于UPA在GCA中的功效的实际数据仍然是空白的。本病例报告描述了一名82岁的女性GCA难治性强的松和TCZ,谁报告了严重的副作用和生活质量下降,从后者的药物。UPA治疗导致症状显著改善,包括头痛和疲劳,负面反应最小。这一结果表明,对于对当前标准治疗无反应或不耐受的GCA患者,UPA是一种有希望的治疗选择。需要进一步的现实世界研究来验证UPA治疗GCA的长期安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信