Review of Transperineal and Transrectal Prostate Biopsy Outcomes.

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Evan Suzman, B Malik Wahba, Gal Wald, Aayush Kaneria, Jim C Hu
{"title":"Review of Transperineal and Transrectal Prostate Biopsy Outcomes.","authors":"Evan Suzman, B Malik Wahba, Gal Wald, Aayush Kaneria, Jim C Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2025.07.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>More than 2 million prostate biopsies are performed annually in the USA and Europe, but there is debate over the optimal approach. The procedural time is shorter for transrectal (TR) than for transperineal (TP) biopsy, but prospective randomized trials have demonstrated that TR biopsy has a greater risk of infectious complications and inferior cancer detection rates. As a result, professional guideline recommendations are shifting in favor of TP biopsy. Nevertheless, the TR approach still accounts for the majority of biopsies performed worldwide. Barriers to TP biopsy adoption include limited training opportunities, longer procedure duration, and higher costs in comparison to TR biopsy. PATIENT SUMMARY: A prostate biopsy is carried out for patients who have a suspicion for prostate cancer, but there is debate over the best biopsy approach. Transrectal (TR) biopsy takes less time than transperineal (TP) biopsy. Trials have shown that TR biopsy has a higher risk of infectious complications and a similar cancer detection rate. Guidelines are therefore shifting in favor of TP biopsy, although limited training opportunities, the longer procedure time, and higher costs are barriers to more widespread use of this approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.07.017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

More than 2 million prostate biopsies are performed annually in the USA and Europe, but there is debate over the optimal approach. The procedural time is shorter for transrectal (TR) than for transperineal (TP) biopsy, but prospective randomized trials have demonstrated that TR biopsy has a greater risk of infectious complications and inferior cancer detection rates. As a result, professional guideline recommendations are shifting in favor of TP biopsy. Nevertheless, the TR approach still accounts for the majority of biopsies performed worldwide. Barriers to TP biopsy adoption include limited training opportunities, longer procedure duration, and higher costs in comparison to TR biopsy. PATIENT SUMMARY: A prostate biopsy is carried out for patients who have a suspicion for prostate cancer, but there is debate over the best biopsy approach. Transrectal (TR) biopsy takes less time than transperineal (TP) biopsy. Trials have shown that TR biopsy has a higher risk of infectious complications and a similar cancer detection rate. Guidelines are therefore shifting in favor of TP biopsy, although limited training opportunities, the longer procedure time, and higher costs are barriers to more widespread use of this approach.

经会阴和经直肠前列腺活检结果综述。
在美国和欧洲,每年有超过200万例前列腺活组织检查,但关于最佳方法存在争议。经直肠活检(TR)的手术时间比经会阴活检(TP)短,但前瞻性随机试验表明,TR活检有更大的感染并发症风险和较低的癌症检出率。因此,专业指南建议转向TP活检。尽管如此,TR方法仍然占世界范围内活检的大多数。与TR活检相比,TP活检采用的障碍包括培训机会有限、手术时间较长以及成本较高。患者总结:前列腺活检是对怀疑患有前列腺癌的患者进行的,但对于最佳活检方法存在争议。经直肠(TR)活检比经会阴(TP)活检需要更少的时间。试验表明,TR活检具有较高的感染并发症风险和相似的癌症检出率。因此,指南正在转向TP活检,尽管培训机会有限、手术时间较长和成本较高是该方法更广泛应用的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European urology focus
European urology focus Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
274
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: European Urology Focus is a new sister journal to European Urology and an official publication of the European Association of Urology (EAU). EU Focus will publish original articles, opinion piece editorials and topical reviews on a wide range of urological issues such as oncology, functional urology, reconstructive urology, laparoscopy, robotic surgery, endourology, female urology, andrology, paediatric urology and sexual medicine. The editorial team welcome basic and translational research articles in the field of urological diseases. Authors may be solicited by the Editor directly. All submitted manuscripts will be peer-reviewed by a panel of experts before being considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信