Evan Suzman, B Malik Wahba, Gal Wald, Aayush Kaneria, Jim C Hu
{"title":"Review of Transperineal and Transrectal Prostate Biopsy Outcomes.","authors":"Evan Suzman, B Malik Wahba, Gal Wald, Aayush Kaneria, Jim C Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2025.07.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>More than 2 million prostate biopsies are performed annually in the USA and Europe, but there is debate over the optimal approach. The procedural time is shorter for transrectal (TR) than for transperineal (TP) biopsy, but prospective randomized trials have demonstrated that TR biopsy has a greater risk of infectious complications and inferior cancer detection rates. As a result, professional guideline recommendations are shifting in favor of TP biopsy. Nevertheless, the TR approach still accounts for the majority of biopsies performed worldwide. Barriers to TP biopsy adoption include limited training opportunities, longer procedure duration, and higher costs in comparison to TR biopsy. PATIENT SUMMARY: A prostate biopsy is carried out for patients who have a suspicion for prostate cancer, but there is debate over the best biopsy approach. Transrectal (TR) biopsy takes less time than transperineal (TP) biopsy. Trials have shown that TR biopsy has a higher risk of infectious complications and a similar cancer detection rate. Guidelines are therefore shifting in favor of TP biopsy, although limited training opportunities, the longer procedure time, and higher costs are barriers to more widespread use of this approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.07.017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
More than 2 million prostate biopsies are performed annually in the USA and Europe, but there is debate over the optimal approach. The procedural time is shorter for transrectal (TR) than for transperineal (TP) biopsy, but prospective randomized trials have demonstrated that TR biopsy has a greater risk of infectious complications and inferior cancer detection rates. As a result, professional guideline recommendations are shifting in favor of TP biopsy. Nevertheless, the TR approach still accounts for the majority of biopsies performed worldwide. Barriers to TP biopsy adoption include limited training opportunities, longer procedure duration, and higher costs in comparison to TR biopsy. PATIENT SUMMARY: A prostate biopsy is carried out for patients who have a suspicion for prostate cancer, but there is debate over the best biopsy approach. Transrectal (TR) biopsy takes less time than transperineal (TP) biopsy. Trials have shown that TR biopsy has a higher risk of infectious complications and a similar cancer detection rate. Guidelines are therefore shifting in favor of TP biopsy, although limited training opportunities, the longer procedure time, and higher costs are barriers to more widespread use of this approach.
期刊介绍:
European Urology Focus is a new sister journal to European Urology and an official publication of the European Association of Urology (EAU).
EU Focus will publish original articles, opinion piece editorials and topical reviews on a wide range of urological issues such as oncology, functional urology, reconstructive urology, laparoscopy, robotic surgery, endourology, female urology, andrology, paediatric urology and sexual medicine. The editorial team welcome basic and translational research articles in the field of urological diseases. Authors may be solicited by the Editor directly. All submitted manuscripts will be peer-reviewed by a panel of experts before being considered for publication.