Making facilitates an engineering student's identity work in becoming an engineer

IF 3.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Yume Menghe Xu, Brian E. Gravel
{"title":"Making facilitates an engineering student's identity work in becoming an engineer","authors":"Yume Menghe Xu,&nbsp;Brian E. Gravel","doi":"10.1002/jee.70027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Many students bring rich experiences and identities related to making activities into undergraduate engineering programs. However, the dominant technocentric narratives in engineering dictate which forms of making are legitimized in engineering practices, marginalizing students whose identities do not align with the canonical norms of engineering.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study characterizes the identity processes of students with rich experiences related to making as they navigate institutional cultures. It offers insights into how engineering programs can better support students' identity work through making.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>The study uses narrative inquiry to construct a case study of the engagement of an engineering student, Sarah, in an undergraduate course focused on exploring the relationships between making and engineering. The analysis closely examines Sarah's identity work throughout the course and investigates how the course supported the process.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Sarah experienced tensions when navigating the institutionalized narratives of the engineering program, which led her to doubt the legitimacy of her past making experiences as valuable for her participation. Through her identity work negotiating the tensions she experienced, she resisted assimilating with those narratives, recognized her past making experiences as assets for engineering learning, and repositioned herself as a legitimate member of the program.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Understanding the tensions undergraduate students experience between their past making experiences and the institutionalized narratives of engineering programs can help educators and researchers to better understand their identity processes. Supporting students in viewing their past making experiences as assets for engineering learning can facilitate their identity work to legitimize their participation in engineering.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50206,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Education","volume":"114 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jee.70027","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Many students bring rich experiences and identities related to making activities into undergraduate engineering programs. However, the dominant technocentric narratives in engineering dictate which forms of making are legitimized in engineering practices, marginalizing students whose identities do not align with the canonical norms of engineering.

Purpose

This study characterizes the identity processes of students with rich experiences related to making as they navigate institutional cultures. It offers insights into how engineering programs can better support students' identity work through making.

Design

The study uses narrative inquiry to construct a case study of the engagement of an engineering student, Sarah, in an undergraduate course focused on exploring the relationships between making and engineering. The analysis closely examines Sarah's identity work throughout the course and investigates how the course supported the process.

Results

Sarah experienced tensions when navigating the institutionalized narratives of the engineering program, which led her to doubt the legitimacy of her past making experiences as valuable for her participation. Through her identity work negotiating the tensions she experienced, she resisted assimilating with those narratives, recognized her past making experiences as assets for engineering learning, and repositioned herself as a legitimate member of the program.

Conclusions

Understanding the tensions undergraduate students experience between their past making experiences and the institutionalized narratives of engineering programs can help educators and researchers to better understand their identity processes. Supporting students in viewing their past making experiences as assets for engineering learning can facilitate their identity work to legitimize their participation in engineering.

制作有助于工程专业学生成为工程师的身份工作
许多学生带着丰富的经验和身份进入本科工程课程。然而,在工程中占主导地位的以技术为中心的叙述决定了哪些制造形式在工程实践中是合法的,将那些身份与工程规范不一致的学生边缘化。本研究描述了具有丰富制作经验的学生在机构文化中的身份认同过程。它提供了关于工程项目如何通过制作更好地支持学生身份工作的见解。本研究采用叙事探究的方法构建了一个工程专业学生Sarah参与的案例研究,该学生在本科课程中专注于探索制造与工程之间的关系。分析仔细检查了Sarah在整个课程中的身份工作,并调查了课程是如何支持这一过程的。Sarah在工程项目的制度化叙述中经历了紧张,这导致她怀疑她过去的经历对她的参与是否有价值。通过她的身份认同工作来处理她所经历的紧张关系,她拒绝被这些叙述同化,认识到她过去的制作经验是工程学习的资产,并将自己重新定位为项目的合法成员。理解本科生在他们过去的制作经历和工程项目的制度化叙述之间的紧张关系,可以帮助教育工作者和研究人员更好地理解他们的身份过程。支持学生将他们过去的制作经验视为工程学习的资产,可以促进他们的身份工作,使他们参与工程合法化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Engineering Education
Journal of Engineering Education 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Engineering Education (JEE) serves to cultivate, disseminate, and archive scholarly research in engineering education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信