The hospital frailty risk score outperforms other risk stratification indices at predicting complications following total shoulder arthroplasty

Q4 Medicine
John W. Moore BS , Sophia Sitsis BS , Vivek Pandey BS , Alexander S. Guareschi MD , Jason Silvestre MD , Brandon L. Rogalski MD , Josef K. Eichinger MD , Richard J. Friedman MD, FRCSC
{"title":"The hospital frailty risk score outperforms other risk stratification indices at predicting complications following total shoulder arthroplasty","authors":"John W. Moore BS ,&nbsp;Sophia Sitsis BS ,&nbsp;Vivek Pandey BS ,&nbsp;Alexander S. Guareschi MD ,&nbsp;Jason Silvestre MD ,&nbsp;Brandon L. Rogalski MD ,&nbsp;Josef K. Eichinger MD ,&nbsp;Richard J. Friedman MD, FRCSC","doi":"10.1053/j.sart.2025.04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Frailty and comorbidity indices are commonly used to stratify risk in orthopedic patients. The purpose of this study was to examine the hospital frailty risk score (HFRS), Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI), Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Index (CCI), and Modified 5-Item Frailty Index (mFI-5) to determine which index more accurately predicted complications following primary total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried from 2016 to 2021 to identify primary TSAs. HFRS, ECI, CCI, and mFI-5 scores were calculated. Generalized additive models were used to evaluate each index. Accuracy was assessed using the area under the curve of the receiver operative curve (AUC of ROC).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>HFRS was superior at predicting any complication, any medical complication, any surgical complication, revision, periprosthetic fracture, prosthetic loosening, complications requiring débridement, transfusion, Acute Respiratory Disease Syndrome (ARDS), acute renal failure, pneumonia, sepsis, and urinary tract infection. ECI was superior at predicting readmission, postoperative bleeding, and pulmonary embolism. CCI and mFI-5 were not superior to the other indices.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The HFRS outperformed all other risk stratification indices at predicting rates of any complication, any surgical complication, any medical complication, revision, infection requiring débridement, periprosthetic fracture, prosthetic loosening, ARDS, acute renal failure, pneumonia, sepsis, transfusion, and urinary tract infection. ECI was the second-best index and outperformed all other indices at predicting rates of readmission and pulmonary embolism. No index was acceptable (AUC of ROC &gt;0.7) at predicting surgical complications, readmissions, or revisions. These results indicate the HFRS may be the best risk stratification index for predicting complications following primary TSA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":39885,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","volume":"35 3","pages":"Pages 471-481"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045452725000525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Frailty and comorbidity indices are commonly used to stratify risk in orthopedic patients. The purpose of this study was to examine the hospital frailty risk score (HFRS), Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI), Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Index (CCI), and Modified 5-Item Frailty Index (mFI-5) to determine which index more accurately predicted complications following primary total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA).

Methods

The Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried from 2016 to 2021 to identify primary TSAs. HFRS, ECI, CCI, and mFI-5 scores were calculated. Generalized additive models were used to evaluate each index. Accuracy was assessed using the area under the curve of the receiver operative curve (AUC of ROC).

Results

HFRS was superior at predicting any complication, any medical complication, any surgical complication, revision, periprosthetic fracture, prosthetic loosening, complications requiring débridement, transfusion, Acute Respiratory Disease Syndrome (ARDS), acute renal failure, pneumonia, sepsis, and urinary tract infection. ECI was superior at predicting readmission, postoperative bleeding, and pulmonary embolism. CCI and mFI-5 were not superior to the other indices.

Discussion

The HFRS outperformed all other risk stratification indices at predicting rates of any complication, any surgical complication, any medical complication, revision, infection requiring débridement, periprosthetic fracture, prosthetic loosening, ARDS, acute renal failure, pneumonia, sepsis, transfusion, and urinary tract infection. ECI was the second-best index and outperformed all other indices at predicting rates of readmission and pulmonary embolism. No index was acceptable (AUC of ROC >0.7) at predicting surgical complications, readmissions, or revisions. These results indicate the HFRS may be the best risk stratification index for predicting complications following primary TSA.
在预测全肩关节置换术后并发症方面,医院衰弱风险评分优于其他风险分层指标
背景:虚弱和合并症指标通常用于骨科患者的风险分层。本研究的目的是检查医院衰弱风险评分(HFRS)、Elixhauser合并症指数(ECI)、Charlson-Deyo合并症指数(CCI)和改良5项衰弱指数(mFI-5),以确定哪种指数更准确地预测原发性全肩关节置换术(TSA)后的并发症。方法查询2016 - 2021年全国再入院数据库,确定主要TSAs。计算HFRS、ECI、CCI和mFI-5评分。采用广义加性模型对各指标进行评价。使用受试者工作曲线曲线下面积(AUC of ROC)评估准确性。结果shfrs在预测并发症、内科并发症、外科并发症、翻修、假体周围骨折、假体松动、需要换装的并发症、输血、急性呼吸系统疾病综合征(ARDS)、急性肾功能衰竭、肺炎、败血症和尿路感染等方面均具有优势。ECI在预测再入院、术后出血和肺栓塞方面具有优势。CCI和mFI-5均不优于其他指标。HFRS在预测任何并发症、任何手术并发症、任何内科并发症、翻修手术、需要进行手术的感染、假体周围骨折、假体松动、急性呼吸窘迫综合征、急性肾功能衰竭、肺炎、败血症、输血和尿路感染的发生率方面优于所有其他风险分层指标。ECI是第二好的指标,在预测再入院率和肺栓塞率方面优于所有其他指标。在预测手术并发症、再入院或改期方面没有可接受的指标(ROC的AUC >;0.7)。这些结果表明,HFRS可能是预测原发性TSA并发症的最佳风险分层指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Seminars in Arthroplasty
Seminars in Arthroplasty Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
期刊介绍: Each issue of Seminars in Arthroplasty provides a comprehensive, current overview of a single topic in arthroplasty. The journal addresses orthopedic surgeons, providing authoritative reviews with emphasis on new developments relevant to their practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信