Reverse or anatomic shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis in patients over 70: readmission rates and utilization trends

Q4 Medicine
Tej Joshi MD , Akhil Katakam MD , Daniella Ogilvie MD , Tuckerman Jones MD , Francis J. Sirch MD , Daniel Calem MD , Eitan M. Kohan MD , Francis G. Alberta MD
{"title":"Reverse or anatomic shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis in patients over 70: readmission rates and utilization trends","authors":"Tej Joshi MD ,&nbsp;Akhil Katakam MD ,&nbsp;Daniella Ogilvie MD ,&nbsp;Tuckerman Jones MD ,&nbsp;Francis J. Sirch MD ,&nbsp;Daniel Calem MD ,&nbsp;Eitan M. Kohan MD ,&nbsp;Francis G. Alberta MD","doi":"10.1053/j.sart.2025.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is increasingly used to treat elderly patients with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis regardless of rotator cuff integrity to avoid potential future revision surgery. We aimed to determine whether there was a difference in readmission rates and profile of patients aged ≥70 who underwent rTSA vs. anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) for GHOA and analyze a trend in the utilization of each arthroplasty type.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried to identify all patients aged ≥70 undergoing either rTSA or aTSA for GHOA from 2016 to 2021. The patients were then tracked to identify subsequent readmissions within 30 and 90 days. Patient demographics, readmission rates, and causes of readmission were analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>84,463 (33.6%) aTSA and 166,585 (66.4%) rTSA patients were identified utilizing weighted data. Of all patients undergoing aTSA, 2.3% and 2.1% were readmitted at 30 and 90 days, respectively. Of rTSA patients, 3.5% and 3.0% were readmitted at 30 and 90 days, respectively. At 30 and 90 days, patients undergoing rTSA were 1.314 (95% CI: 1.245-1.387; <em>P</em> &lt; .001) and 1.223 (95% CI: 1.156-1.294; <em>P</em> &lt; .001) times more likely to be readmitted than patients who underwent aTSA. From 2016 to 2021, there was a significant increase in utilization of rTSA for GHOA, with a 3.8% increase in utilization per year.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients ≥70 undergoing rTSA for GHOA have a higher risk of readmission at both 30 and 90 days. There continues to be a significant increase in the utilization of rTSA for GHOA at a rate of 3.8% per year.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":39885,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","volume":"35 3","pages":"Pages 454-463"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045452725000501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is increasingly used to treat elderly patients with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis regardless of rotator cuff integrity to avoid potential future revision surgery. We aimed to determine whether there was a difference in readmission rates and profile of patients aged ≥70 who underwent rTSA vs. anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) for GHOA and analyze a trend in the utilization of each arthroplasty type.

Methods

Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried to identify all patients aged ≥70 undergoing either rTSA or aTSA for GHOA from 2016 to 2021. The patients were then tracked to identify subsequent readmissions within 30 and 90 days. Patient demographics, readmission rates, and causes of readmission were analyzed.

Results

84,463 (33.6%) aTSA and 166,585 (66.4%) rTSA patients were identified utilizing weighted data. Of all patients undergoing aTSA, 2.3% and 2.1% were readmitted at 30 and 90 days, respectively. Of rTSA patients, 3.5% and 3.0% were readmitted at 30 and 90 days, respectively. At 30 and 90 days, patients undergoing rTSA were 1.314 (95% CI: 1.245-1.387; P < .001) and 1.223 (95% CI: 1.156-1.294; P < .001) times more likely to be readmitted than patients who underwent aTSA. From 2016 to 2021, there was a significant increase in utilization of rTSA for GHOA, with a 3.8% increase in utilization per year.

Conclusion

Patients ≥70 undergoing rTSA for GHOA have a higher risk of readmission at both 30 and 90 days. There continues to be a significant increase in the utilization of rTSA for GHOA at a rate of 3.8% per year.
70岁以上患者肩关节骨性关节炎的反向或解剖性肩关节置换术:再入院率和使用趋势
背景反向全肩关节置换术(rTSA)越来越多地用于治疗老年原发性盂肱骨关节炎患者,而不考虑肩袖完整性,以避免潜在的未来翻修手术。我们的目的是确定年龄≥70岁的患者接受rTSA与解剖全肩关节置换术(aTSA)治疗GHOA的再入院率和概况是否存在差异,并分析每种关节置换术的使用趋势。方法查询全国再入院数据库,以确定2016年至2021年期间接受rTSA或aTSA治疗GHOA的所有年龄≥70岁的患者。然后对患者进行跟踪,以确定30天和90天内的再入院情况。分析患者人口统计学、再入院率和再入院原因。结果利用加权数据共识别aTSA患者84463例(33.6%),rTSA患者166585例(66.4%)。在所有接受aTSA的患者中,2.3%和2.1%分别在30天和90天再次入院。在rTSA患者中,分别有3.5%和3.0%的患者在30天和90天再次入院。在30天和90天,接受rTSA的患者为1.314 (95% CI: 1.245-1.387;P & lt;.001)和1.223 (95% CI: 1.156-1.294;P & lt;.001)再次入院的可能性是接受aTSA的患者的两倍。从2016年到2021年,rTSA对GHOA的利用率显著增加,每年增加3.8%。结论≥70例接受rTSA治疗的患者在30天和90天再入院的风险均较高。rTSA在GHOA中的使用率继续以每年3.8%的速度显著增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Seminars in Arthroplasty
Seminars in Arthroplasty Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
期刊介绍: Each issue of Seminars in Arthroplasty provides a comprehensive, current overview of a single topic in arthroplasty. The journal addresses orthopedic surgeons, providing authoritative reviews with emphasis on new developments relevant to their practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信