Stem height in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for fracture: deltoid and pectoralis major tendon distances from an inlay tray

Q4 Medicine
Theodore L. Schoenfeldt MD , Austin Darden BS , Nicholas Crosby MD , Gregory Merrell MD
{"title":"Stem height in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for fracture: deltoid and pectoralis major tendon distances from an inlay tray","authors":"Theodore L. Schoenfeldt MD ,&nbsp;Austin Darden BS ,&nbsp;Nicholas Crosby MD ,&nbsp;Gregory Merrell MD","doi":"10.1053/j.sart.2025.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has emerged as a favorable treatment for comminuted proximal humerus fractures, however, can be challenging due to the need to restore humeral height. Minimal research has been done investigating distances from anatomic landmarks to inlay tray designs in RTSA. This study evaluated anatomic references for use in RTSA and investigated how inlay stem designs impact distances from anatomic landmarks.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Twelve fresh frozen cadaver shoulders were dissected via a standard deltopectoral approach. Zimmer Trabecular Metal and DonJoy Orthopedics Altivate inlay stems were utilized in each cadaver, placed with the prosthesis tray flush with the cut. Measurements were taken from the top of the deltoid insertion to the most medial and lateral edges of the prosthesis tray (distance between deltoid tendon insertion and medial tray and distance between deltoid tendon insertion and lateral tray, respectively). Measurements were also taken from the transverse fibers at the top pectoralis major tendon (PMT) insertion to the most medial and lateral prosthesis tray (distance between PMT and medial tray and distance between pecotralis major tendon and lateral tray, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Using the Zimmer system, the average distance from the deltoid insertion to the medial tray edge was 64.8 ± 13.1 mm, and the average distance from the deltoid insertion to the lateral tray edge was 84.9 ± 10.7 mm. The average distance from the pectoralis insertion to the medial tray edge was 30 ± 4.3 mm, and the average distance from the pectoralis insertion to the lateral tray edge was 49.4 ± 4.3 mm. Using the DonJoy Orthopedics system, the average distance from the deltoid insertion to the medial tray edge was 64.6 ± 11.9 mm, and the average distance from the deltoid insertion to the lateral tray edge was 86.4 ± 10.7 mm. The average distance from the pectoralis insertion to the medial tray edge was 29.8 ± 4.2 mm, and the average distance from the pectoralis insertion to the lateral tray edge was 51.2 ± 3.1 mm. The overall mean distance between PMT and medial tray and distance between pecotralis major tendon and lateral tray was 29.9 ± 4.2 mm and 50.3 ± 3.7 mm, respectively, and the overall mean distance between deltoid tendon insertion and medial tray and distance between deltoid tendon insertion and lateral tray was 64.7 ± 12.2 mm and 85.7 ± 10.5 mm, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>More precise and accurate ratios were found using the PMT insertion compared to the deltoid tendon insertion. Measurements using two different inlay tray system manufacturers were comparable. These findings aid surgeons intraoperatively in the attempt of proper prosthesis placement during RTSA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":39885,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","volume":"35 3","pages":"Pages 343-347"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045452725000276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has emerged as a favorable treatment for comminuted proximal humerus fractures, however, can be challenging due to the need to restore humeral height. Minimal research has been done investigating distances from anatomic landmarks to inlay tray designs in RTSA. This study evaluated anatomic references for use in RTSA and investigated how inlay stem designs impact distances from anatomic landmarks.

Methods

Twelve fresh frozen cadaver shoulders were dissected via a standard deltopectoral approach. Zimmer Trabecular Metal and DonJoy Orthopedics Altivate inlay stems were utilized in each cadaver, placed with the prosthesis tray flush with the cut. Measurements were taken from the top of the deltoid insertion to the most medial and lateral edges of the prosthesis tray (distance between deltoid tendon insertion and medial tray and distance between deltoid tendon insertion and lateral tray, respectively). Measurements were also taken from the transverse fibers at the top pectoralis major tendon (PMT) insertion to the most medial and lateral prosthesis tray (distance between PMT and medial tray and distance between pecotralis major tendon and lateral tray, respectively).

Results

Using the Zimmer system, the average distance from the deltoid insertion to the medial tray edge was 64.8 ± 13.1 mm, and the average distance from the deltoid insertion to the lateral tray edge was 84.9 ± 10.7 mm. The average distance from the pectoralis insertion to the medial tray edge was 30 ± 4.3 mm, and the average distance from the pectoralis insertion to the lateral tray edge was 49.4 ± 4.3 mm. Using the DonJoy Orthopedics system, the average distance from the deltoid insertion to the medial tray edge was 64.6 ± 11.9 mm, and the average distance from the deltoid insertion to the lateral tray edge was 86.4 ± 10.7 mm. The average distance from the pectoralis insertion to the medial tray edge was 29.8 ± 4.2 mm, and the average distance from the pectoralis insertion to the lateral tray edge was 51.2 ± 3.1 mm. The overall mean distance between PMT and medial tray and distance between pecotralis major tendon and lateral tray was 29.9 ± 4.2 mm and 50.3 ± 3.7 mm, respectively, and the overall mean distance between deltoid tendon insertion and medial tray and distance between deltoid tendon insertion and lateral tray was 64.7 ± 12.2 mm and 85.7 ± 10.5 mm, respectively.

Conclusion

More precise and accurate ratios were found using the PMT insertion compared to the deltoid tendon insertion. Measurements using two different inlay tray system manufacturers were comparable. These findings aid surgeons intraoperatively in the attempt of proper prosthesis placement during RTSA.
骨折逆行全肩关节置换术的椎体高度:三角肌和胸大肌肌腱与嵌体托盘的距离
背景:逆行全肩关节置换术(RTSA)已成为粉碎性肱骨近端骨折的一种良好治疗方法,然而,由于需要恢复肱骨高度,它可能具有挑战性。在RTSA中,最小的研究已经完成了从解剖地标到镶嵌托盘设计的距离的调查。本研究评估了用于RTSA的解剖学参考文献,并研究了嵌体干设计如何影响到解剖地标的距离。方法采用标准三角胸侧入路对12例新鲜冷冻尸体肩部进行解剖。在每具尸体上使用Zimmer小梁金属和DonJoy骨科的Altivate嵌体茎,放置假体托盘与切口齐平。测量从三角肌腱止点顶部到假体托盘最内侧和外侧边缘(分别为三角肌腱止点与内侧托盘之间的距离和三角肌腱止点与外侧托盘之间的距离)。测量从胸大肌肌腱(PMT)顶部止点到最内侧和外侧假体托盘的横向纤维(PMT与内侧托盘之间的距离以及胸大肌肌腱与外侧托盘之间的距离)。结果使用Zimmer系统时,三角肌止点到托盘内侧边缘的平均距离为64.8±13.1 mm,三角肌止点到托盘外侧边缘的平均距离为84.9±10.7 mm。胸肌止点至内侧托盘边缘的平均距离为30±4.3 mm,胸肌止点至外侧托盘边缘的平均距离为49.4±4.3 mm。使用DonJoy骨科系统,从三角肌止点到托盘内侧边缘的平均距离为64.6±11.9 mm,从三角肌止点到托盘外侧边缘的平均距离为86.4±10.7 mm。胸肌止点至内侧托盘边缘的平均距离为29.8±4.2 mm,胸肌止点至外侧托盘边缘的平均距离为51.2±3.1 mm。PMT与内侧托架的总平均距离、大肌腱与外侧托架的总平均距离分别为29.9±4.2 mm和50.3±3.7 mm,三角腱止点与内侧托架的总平均距离、三角腱止点与外侧托架的总平均距离分别为64.7±12.2 mm和85.7±10.5 mm。结论PMT止点比三角肌腱止点更精确、准确。测量使用两种不同的镶嵌托盘系统制造商是可比性的。这些发现有助于外科医生在RTSA术中尝试适当的假体放置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Seminars in Arthroplasty
Seminars in Arthroplasty Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
期刊介绍: Each issue of Seminars in Arthroplasty provides a comprehensive, current overview of a single topic in arthroplasty. The journal addresses orthopedic surgeons, providing authoritative reviews with emphasis on new developments relevant to their practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信